Are there any differences in acute adverse reactions among five low-osmolar non-ionic iodinated contrast media?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The differences regarding adverse reactions in different low-osmolar non-ionic contrast media had not been investigated previously. Thus, the aims of this study were to identify differences in the incidence of adverse reactions in five different low-osmolar non-ionic contrast media.
We prospectively recorded all adverse events associated with five different low-osmolar non-ionic contrast media used in 8,931 consecutive patients for CT. Patients were randomly assigned to five groups: iomeprol 300 mgI/ml, iopamidol 300 mgI/ml, iohexol 300 mgI/ml, iopromide 300 mgI/ml and ioversol 320 mgI/ml.
Adverse events were observed in 241 patients (2.7%). The incidence of acute adverse reactions was significantly higher in the following groups: (1) iomeprol (3.9%) and iopromide (3.5%) groups, (2) patients aged 59 years or less (4.5%) compared with those aged 60 years or over (1.9%), (3) the first period (3.5%) compared with the late period (2.3%), (4) those with a past history of adverse reactions to contrast media (11.2%), and (5) patients receiving contrast media for the first time (3.3%) compared with those had received it previously (2.0%).
The incidence of acute adverse reactions may be reduced in younger patients by using iopamidol, iohexol and ioversol.
- Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media: a report from the Japanese committee on safety of contrast media. Radiology 175:621–628
- Thomsen HS, Dorph S (1993) High-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media. Acta Radiol 34:205–209 CrossRef
- Thomsen HS, Bush WH (1998) Adverse effects of contrast media. Incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf 19:313–324 CrossRef
- Christiansen C, Pichler WJ, Skotland T (2000) Delayed allergy-like reactions to X-ray contrast media: mechanistic considerations. Eur Radiol 10:1965–1975 CrossRef
- Morcos SK, Thomsen HS (2001) Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol 11:1267–1275 CrossRef
- Schild HS, Kuhl CK, Hubner-Steiner U, Bohm I, Speck U (2006) Adverse events after unenhanced and monomeric and dimeric contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Radiology 240:56–64 CrossRef
- Kennedy BC, Rickards D, Lee S, Sharp MB, Dawson P (1988) A double-blind study comparing the efficiency, tolerance and renal effects of iopromide and iopamidol. Br J Radiol 61:288–293 CrossRef
- Goldberg SN, Abrahams J, Drayer BP, Golding S, Bernardino M, Brunetti J (1994) A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Invest Radiol 29:76–83 CrossRef
- Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A (1994) A randomised, double-blind trial of iomeprol and iopromide in intravenous excretory urography. Eur J Radiol 18:93–96
- Geeter PD, Melchior H (1994) Iomeprol versus iopromide for intravenous urography. Br J Radiol 67:958–963 CrossRef
- Hoogewoud HM, Woessmer B (1996) Iobitridol 300 compared to iopromide 300—a double-blind randomized phase-III study of clinical tolerance in total body CT. Acta Radiol 37:62–64
- Sutton AGC, Finn P, Campbell PG et al (2003) Early and late reactions following the use of iopamidol 340, iomeprol 350 and iodixanol 320 in cardiac catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 15:133–138
- Mortele KJ, Oliva MR, Ondategui S, Ros PR, Silverman SG (2005) Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in large urban teaching hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:31–34
- Giercksky KE (1986) Piroxicam and gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Med 81:2–5
- Are there any differences in acute adverse reactions among five low-osmolar non-ionic iodinated contrast media?
Volume 20, Issue 7 , pp 1631-1635
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Contrast media
- Adverse reaction
- Patient age
- Industry Sectors