European Radiology

, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp 1737–1744

Polyp measurement and size categorisation by CT colonography: effect of observer experience in a multi-centre setting

  • David Burling
  • Steve Halligan
  • Douglas G. Altman
  • Wendy Atkin
  • Clive Bartram
  • Helen Fenlon
  • Andrea Laghi
  • Jaap Stoker
  • Stuart Taylor
  • Roger Frost
  • Guido Dessey
  • Melinda De Villiers
  • Jasper Florie
  • Shane Foley
  • Lesley Honeyfield
  • Riccardo Iannaccone
  • Teresa Gallo
  • Clive Kay
  • Philippe Lefere
  • Andrew Lowe
  • Filipo Mangiapane
  • Jesse Marrannes
  • Emmanuele Neri
  • Giulia Nieddu
  • David Nicholson
  • Alan O’Hare
  • Sante Ori
  • Benedetta Politi
  • Martin Poulus
  • Daniele Regge
  • Lisa Renaut
  • Velauthan Rudralingham
  • Saverio Signoretta
  • Paola Vagli
  • Victor Van der Hulst
  • Jane Williams-Butt
Gastrointestinal

DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0189-2

Cite this article as:
Burling, D., Halligan, S., Altman, D.G. et al. Eur Radiol (2006) 16: 1737. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0189-2

Abstract

The extent measurement error on CT colonography influences polyp categorisation according to established management guidelines is studied using twenty-eight observers of varying experience to classify polyps seen at CT colonography as either ‘medium’ (maximal diameter 6-9 mm) or ‘large’ (maximal diameter 10 mm or larger). Comparison was then made with the reference diameter obtained in each patient via colonoscopy. The Bland-Altman method was used to assess agreement between observer measurements and colonoscopy, and differences in measurement and categorisation was assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-squared test statistics respectively. Observer measurements on average underestimated the diameter of polyps when compared to the reference value, by approximately 2–3 mm, irrespective of observer experience. Ninety-five percent limits of agreement were relatively wide for all observer groups, and had sufficient span to encompass different size categories for polyps. There were 167 polyp observations and 135 (81%) were correctly categorised. Of the 32 observations that were miscategorised, 5 (16%) were overestimations and 27 (84%) were underestimations (i.e. large polyps misclassified as medium). Caution should be exercised for polyps whose colonographic diameter is below but close to the 1-cm boundary threshold in order to avoid potential miscategorisation of advanced adenomas.

Keywords

CT colonComputerised tomographyVirtual colonoscopy

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Burling
    • 1
  • Steve Halligan
    • 2
  • Douglas G. Altman
    • 3
  • Wendy Atkin
    • 9
  • Clive Bartram
    • 1
  • Helen Fenlon
    • 4
  • Andrea Laghi
    • 5
  • Jaap Stoker
    • 6
  • Stuart Taylor
    • 2
  • Roger Frost
    • 7
  • Guido Dessey
    • 8
  • Melinda De Villiers
    • 1
  • Jasper Florie
    • 6
  • Shane Foley
    • 4
  • Lesley Honeyfield
    • 1
  • Riccardo Iannaccone
    • 5
  • Teresa Gallo
    • 10
  • Clive Kay
    • 11
  • Philippe Lefere
    • 8
  • Andrew Lowe
    • 11
  • Filipo Mangiapane
    • 5
  • Jesse Marrannes
    • 8
  • Emmanuele Neri
    • 12
  • Giulia Nieddu
    • 10
  • David Nicholson
    • 13
  • Alan O’Hare
    • 4
  • Sante Ori
    • 5
  • Benedetta Politi
    • 12
  • Martin Poulus
    • 6
  • Daniele Regge
    • 10
  • Lisa Renaut
    • 13
  • Velauthan Rudralingham
    • 13
  • Saverio Signoretta
    • 10
  • Paola Vagli
    • 12
  • Victor Van der Hulst
    • 6
  • Jane Williams-Butt
    • 11
  1. 1.Intestinal Imaging CentreSt. Marks HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.Specialist Radiology, Level 2 PodiumUniversity College HospitalLondonUK
  3. 3.Centre for Medical StatisticsOxfordUK
  4. 4.Mater MisericordiaeDublinIreland
  5. 5.La SapienzaRomeItaly
  6. 6.Amersterdam Medican CentreAmsterdamThe Netherland
  7. 7.Salisbury District HospitalSalisburyUK
  8. 8.Stedelijk ZiekenhuisRoeselareBelgium
  9. 9.Cancer Research UKSt Mark’s HospitalLondonUK
  10. 10.Candiolo Oncologic HospitalTurinItaly
  11. 11.Bradford Royal InfirmaryBradfordUK
  12. 12.University of PisaPisaItaly
  13. 13.Hope HospitalSalfordUK