Mutations affecting spindle pole body and mitotic exit network function are synthetically lethal with a deletion of the nucleoporin NUP1 in S. cerevisiae
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Harper, N.C., Al-Greene, N.T., Basrai, M.A. et al. Curr Genet (2008) 53: 95. doi:10.1007/s00294-007-0168-4
Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) are embedded in the nuclear envelope of eukaryotic cells and function to regulate passage of macromolecules in and out of the nucleus. Nup1 is one of 30 nucleoporins comprising the NPC of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and is located on the nucleoplasmic face of the NPC where it plays a role in mRNA export and protein transport. In order to further characterize the function of Nup1 we used a genetic approach to identify mutations that are synthetically lethal in combination with a deletion of NUP1 (nup1Δ). We have identified one such nup1 lethal mutant (nle6) as a temperature sensitive allele of nud1. NUD1 encodes a component of the yeast spindle pole body (SPB) and acts as scaffolding for the mitotic exit network (MEN). We observe that nle6/nud1 mutant cells have a normal distribution of NPCs within the nuclear envelope and exhibit normal rates of nuclear protein import at both the permissive and restrictive temperatures. nup1Δ also exhibits synthetic lethality with bub2Δ and bfa1Δ, both of which encode proteins that colocalize with Nud1 at spindle pole bodies and function in the mitotic exit network. However, we do not observe genetic interactions among nle6/nud1, bub2Δ, or bfa1Δ and mutations in the nucleoporin encoding genes NUP60 or NUP170, nor is nup1Δ synthetically lethal with the absence of components downstream in the mitotic exit network, including Lte1, Swi5, and Dbf2. Our results suggest a novel functional connection between Nup1 and proteins comprising both the spindle pole body and early mitotic exit network.
KeywordsNucleoporinNuclear pore complexNuclear transportSpindle pole bodyMitotic exit networkCell cycle
In eukaryotic cells, the nuclear envelope provides the double-membraned barrier separating the cytoplasm from the nucleus. In order to allow the passage of molecules between the cytoplasmic and nucleoplasmic compartments, the nuclear envelope is perforated with large, hetero-oligomeric protein structures termed nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). The NPCs are the sole mediators of nucleocytoplasmic transport across the nuclear envelope. While small molecules are able to passively diffuse through the channel formed within each NPC, the movement of molecules of more than about 50 kDa is regulated (reviewed in Pemberton and Paschal 2005). Each NPC is defined by a filamentous cytoplasmic region, a central transporter region, and a nuclear basket structure and is comprised of approximately 30 different NPC proteins (nucleoporins or Nups), which both generate the structure of the NPC and participate in the transport of substrates through the pore (Rout et al. 2000; Cronshaw et al. 2002; reviewed in Lim and Fahrenkrog 2006). Nup1 is a nucleoporin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that is localized asymmetrically to the nucleoplasmic side of the NPC at the nuclear basket (Rout et al. 2000). Although NUP1 is non-essential in most strain backgrounds, cells lacking NUP1 (nup1Δ) exhibit temperature sensitive growth, as well as defects in mRNA export, nuclear protein import, and nuclear envelope structure (Bogerd et al. 1994; Schlaich and Hurt 1995).
Recently, there has been emerging evidence that the NPC is important in other processes in the cell beyond its function in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Various roles have been characterized for nucleoporins in gene regulation, apoptosis, the secretory pathway and cell cycle control (reviewed in Fahrenkrog et al. 2004). Since the NPC is the only conduit for transport of the many cargos that move between the nucleoplasm and cytoplasm, it is particularly well suited to act as a point of cell cycle control. Alteration of cargo protein localization by phosphorylation adjacent to nuclear localization signals has been a well characterized form of cell cycle regulation (Jans and Hubner 1996; Kaffman and O’Shea 1999). Cargo has also been shown to be compartmentalized by regulated transport. For example, the phosphatase Cdc14 is sequestered to the nucleolus to prevent export and mitotic exit (Visintin et al. 1999). Changes in the NPC have been shown to affect karyopherin binding to nucleoporins and alter transport of substrates temporally during the cell cycle (Makhnevych et al. 2003). Beyond their role in transport, NPCs also physically interact with two spindle assembly checkpoint proteins, Mad1 and Mad2 during the cell cycle (Iouk et al. 2002). Additionally, several connections have been made between the NPC and the spindle pole body (SPB), which is also embedded in the nuclear envelope. The SPB functions as the microtubule-organizing center in yeast and controls assembly and localization of microtubule-based cellular scaffolding as well as chromosome segregation via the mitotic spindle. The NPC and SPB share two components, Cdc31 and Ndc1 (Fischer et al. 2004; Chial et al. 1998). Ndc1 has been shown to play a role in the assembly and insertion of both NPCs and the SPB into the nuclear envelope (Lau et al. 2004; Madrid et al. 2006).
Here we describe a novel connection between the nucleoporin Nup1 and components of the SPB and mitotic exit network (MEN), a cell cycle checkpoint whose protein components localize to the SPB. Previously, we performed a genetic screen to identify mutants in S. cerevisiae that exhibit synthetic lethality with nup1Δ and thus require NUP1 for viability (Belanger et al. 1994). This screen led to the isolation of 17 nup1Δ lethal (nle) mutants, including alleles of genes encoding the nuclear transport protein Kap60 and the nucleoporins Nup170 and Nup82 (Belanger et al. 1994, 2004; Kenna et al. 1996). In this study, we identify nle6 as an allele of NUD1, encoding a SPB protein and anchor for proteins in the MEN (Gruneberg et al. 2000). We also observe that deletions of SPB/MEN components Bfa1 and Bub2 are synthetically lethal with nup1Δ. The conditional nle6/nud1 mutant does not significantly alter NPC localization or protein import kinetics, nor does it affect Bfa1 or Bub2 localization to the NPC. Our results implicate Nup1 and the NPC in a novel role for regulation of cell cycle progression.
Materials and methods
Yeast strains, media, and reagents
Yeast strains and plasmids used in this study
MATa ade2 trp1 leu2 his3 ura3
MATα nup1::LEU2 ade2 ade3 trp1 lys2 ura3 (CEN URA3 ADE3 NUP1) Strain background: W303
Belanger et al. (1994)
MATα nup1::LEU2 nud1-G585Ets his3 ade2 ade3 trp1 ura3 (CEN URA3 ADE3 NUP1) Strain background: W303
Belanger et al. (1994)
MATα nup60::KANR his3 leu2 lys2 ura3
MATα nup133::KANR his3 leu2 lys2 ura3
MATα nup170::KANR his3 leu2 lys2 ura3
MATα bfa1::KANR his3 leu2 lys2 ura3
MATα bub2::KANR his3 leu2 lys2 ura3
MATa nup1::KANR his3 leu2 ura3 met15 (CEN URA3 NUP1)
MATα bfa1::NATR his3 leu2 lys2 ura3
MATα bub2::NATR his3 leu2 lys2 ura3
MATα nud1-G585Ets his3 leu2 ura3 met15
MATa lte1::KANR his3 leu2 met15 ura3
MATa dbf2::KANR his3 leu2 met15 ura3
MATa nup60::KANR his3 leu2 met15 ura3
MATa nup170::KANR his3 leu2 met15 ura3
MATa nup1::KANR his3 leu2 ura3 met15
MATa leu2 lys2 ura3 his3
MATα T7-loxP-nup1ΔFXFG trp1 ura3 leu2 his3
Strawn et al. (2004)
MATa nud1-2::LEU2 nud1::KANR ura3 lys2 ade2 trp1 his3
Gruneberg et al. (2000)
MATα nud1-44::TRP1 nud1::HIS5 ura3 ade3 leu2
Adams and Kilmartin (1999)
Sikorski and Hieter (1989)
Sikorski and Hieter (1989)
CEN NUD1 URA3
Gruneberg et al. (2000)
Bucci and Wente (1998)
CEN NUD1 TRP1
Gruneberg et al. (2000)
CEN NUP1 URA3
Bogerd et al. (1994)
CEN URA3 PHO4-NLS-GFP
Kaffman et al. (1998)
CEN URA3 GFP-Nab2(NAB35)
Lee and Aitchison (1999)
CEN URA3 cNLS-GFP
Shulga et al. (1996)
Cloning and rescue of NUD1
Yeast strain KBY10 containing nle6 was isolated as described previously (Belanger et al. 1994). Strain LDY796 used for cloning nle6 was generated by crossing KBY10 with L2612, sporulating, and isolating temperature sensitive spores lacking nup1::LEU2. Cloning by complementation of nle6 temperature sensitivity was performed by transforming LDY796 with a yeast genomic library in pRS202 (Connelly and Hieter unpublished). Transformants were incubated 5 days at 24°C on SD-Ura media, then were replica plated to fresh SD-Ura and incubated at 37°C. Viable colonies were restreaked to 37°C. Plasmids were isolated from three transformants viable at 37°C using glass bead lysis and retransformed into LDY796 and KBY10 to confirm complementation of nle6 temperature sensitivity and of nup1Δ nle6 synthetic lethality. DNA sequencing of complementing plasmids confirmed the presence of NUD1 on all complementing plasmids. Complementation of nle6ts by NUD1 was confirmed using pSM783.
Genetic analysis of nup and MEN mutants
Tetrad analysis was performed by mating haploid strains (Table 1) containing a deletion of NUP1, NUP60 or NUP170 with various SPB or MEN-encoding gene deletion strains, all in the BY4741/4742 strain background (Open Biosystems, Huntsville, AL). These gene deletions were grown on media containing G418 (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) and ClonNat (Werner Bioagents, Jena, Germany) to select for the associated drug resistance markers. Diploid colonies were suspended in 3 ml 0.3% KAc supplemented with required amino acids at 24°C to induce sporulation. The asci of the resultant tetrads were incubated in 2 mg/ml zymolyase and then 24 tetrads were dissected onto YPD plates and grown at 24°C. Haploid cells from each tetrad were examined for segregation of selective markers by using a 48-prong inoculator to transfer serially diluted cell suspensions onto selective plates. Resultant haploid strains were transferred to SD-Ura, -His, -Met, -Lys, YP-G418 and YP-ClonNat plates. In the case of nup1Δ, crosses were made using a parental strain containing a CEN NUP1 URA3 plasmid (KBY1158) and the haploid progeny were transferred to 5FOA to select against the plasmid. All the plates were then incubated at 24°C, with the exception of YPD and 5FOA, one of each of which was also incubated at 30°C and 37°C.
LDY1033 (wild-type) and KBY1294 (nud1-G585E) strains were transformed with plasmids according to Woods and Geitz (2001). pSW950 (Nic96-GFP) was cut with AflII and integrated at HIS3. pSW956 (Nsp1-GFP) was cut with SpeI and integrated at HIS3. pRL282 (Bfa1-GFP) and pRL288 (Bub2-GFP) were cut with XcmI and integrated at URA3. Cells were grown at 24°C and observed using direct fluorescence microscopy of cells in log phase and after 2–4 h shifts to 37°C. Images were captured using SPOT camera software (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc., Sterling Heights, MI) and final images were produced in Adobe Photoshop CS (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose CA).
In order to examine protein import kinetics, strains W303 (wild type) and LDY796 (nle6), were transformed with plasmid pSV40-NLS-GFP (Shulga et al. 1996), grown in SD–Ura to A600 0.05–0.2, treated with metabolic inhibitor and observed by direct fluorescence microscopy (Shulga et al. 1996) using a Nikon E600 epifluorescence microscope. Samples at 37°C were shifted to the non-permissive temperature for 2 h and treated as described (Belanger et al. 2004).
In order to identify genes encoding proteins that functionally interact with Nup1, we carried out a large-scale screen for mutant alleles that are synthetically lethal with nup1Δ. In this screen, 17 nup1Δ lethal (nle) mutants were obtained, nle1 through nle17 (Belanger et al. 1994). Of these, five have been cloned and all have been alleles of genes encoding proteins known to be involved in nuclear transport: nle1 = srp1/kap60, the NLS-binding subunit of the karyopherin α/β heterodimer (Belanger et al. 1994); nle2 = gle1, an essential activator of mRNA export (Murphy and Wente 1996; Alcazar-Roman et al. 2006; Kenna, Belanger, Davis unpublished); nle3/nle17 = nup170, a nucleoporin important for NPC structure and assembly (Kenna et al. 1996); nle4 = nup82, an essential nucleoporin at the cytoplasmic face of the NPC (Grandi et al. 1995; Hurwitz et al. 1998; Belanger et al. 2004); and nle7 = yrb1, a yeast Ran-binding protein necessary for activating the Ran-GAP (Schlenstedt et al. 1995; Belanger and Davis unpublished).
In order to determine if a loss of Nud1 function affects nuclear protein import through the NPC, we observed the subcellular localization of several nuclear proteins in nud1-G585E mutant cells at permissive and restrictive temperatures. In an effort to identify whether a loss of Nud1 function affected the transport of specific karyopherins/importins, we performed steady-state fluorescence microscopy on nud1-G585E mutant cells expressing a classical NLS (cNLS) imported by the Kap95/Kap60 karyopherin heterodimer (Enenkel et al. 1995), the NLS of Nab2 imported by the karyopherin Kap104 (Siomi et al. 1998; Lee and Aitchison 1999), and the Pho4-NLS imported by Kap121 (Kaffman et al. 1998). The intracellular localization of Nab2-GFP, Pho4-GFP, and cNLS-GFP fusions was predominantly nuclear in wild type and nud1-G585E cells at both 24°C and 37°C (Fig. 3b and data not shown), indicating that Kap60/95, Kap104, and Kap121-mediated protein import is retained in the absence of Nud1 function.
While steady-state localization of these reporters indicated that each could be imported into the nucleus in cells containing the nud1 mutation, this experiment did not address whether the kinetics of import are altered in the absence of Nud1 activity. We next examined whether the rate of import of a nuclear protein containing a classical nuclear localization signal (cNLS) is altered in a nud1-G585E mutant. To this end, we performed a kinetic assay of nuclear transport (Shulga et al. 1996) by transforming wild-type and nud1-G585E cells with a plasmid expressing a cNLS–GFP fusion, equilibrating the cNLS–GFP reporter protein across the nuclear envelope using metabolic inhibitors, then rinsing away the inhibitors to allow nuclear import to occur and cNLS–GFP to re-accumulate in the nucleus. The relative rate of nuclear protein import was determined by calculating the percentage of cells exhibiting a predominantly nuclear accumulation of GFP at 2 min time intervals. Under all conditions tested, approximately 50% of the cells had nuclear fluorescence within 5 min after release from metabolic inhibition (Fig. 3c), indicating that cells containing nud1-G585E import the cNLS–GFP into the nucleus with kinetics similar to wild-type cells at 25° and after a 2 h shift to 37°C. These data suggest that the nud1-G585E mutation of NUD1 does not detectably alter the rate of cNLS-mediated protein import through the NPC.
Synthetic interactions between genes encoding nucleoporins and genes encoding MEN proteins
In order to determine if the genetic interactions we observed between NPC and SPB/MEN components were specific to nup1Δ or were a general phenotype of altered NPC structure or function, we repeated the genetic analyses described above using the nucleoporin mutants nup60Δ and nup170Δ. Nup60 is another FG nucleoporin that, like Nup1, is associated asymmetrically with the nuclear face of the NPC (Rout et al. 2000). Additionally, nup60Δ is synthetically lethal with nup1Δ (Fischer et al. 2002). Nup170 is localized symmetrically in the NPC, but nup170 deletions exhibit chromosome segregation defects and synthetic lethality with nup1Δ (Kerscher et al. 2001; Kenna et al. 1996). We generated haploid spores containing both a deletion of nup60 or nup170 and a mutation in nud1, bub2, bfa1, or other MEN components. Examination of these spores revealed that all combinations of nup/MEN mutations tested remain viable (Table 2). Thus, we observed that, unlike nup1Δ, the nup60Δ and nup170Δ alleles do not exhibit synthetic lethality with nud1-G585E, bub2Δ or bfa1Δ. We conclude that the genetic interactions we observe between nup1Δ and nud1, bub2, and bfa1 are specific and not a general characteristic of NPC mutants.
Nup1 is a member of the FG-repeat containing family of proteins that physically associates with karyopherins in mediating cargo transport through the NPC. Nup1 contains a large central domain comprised almost entirely of ‘FXFG’ repeats, as well as a shorter C-terminal domain that includes several more degenerate ‘FG’ repeats (Davis and Fink 1990). The FXFG repeats of Nup1 associate with several karyopherins, including Kap95 (Rexach and Blobel 1995), and deletion of these repeats results in synthetic genetic interactions with other nucleoporin mutants (Strawn et al. 2004), but the FXFG domain is not essential for efficient cargo transport through the NPC (Pyhtila and Rexach 2003; Zeitler and Weis 2004). In order to investigate whether the synthetic lethality we observed between nup1Δ and early MEN mutants was the result of the absence of Nup1 FXFG repeats, we generated double mutant cells containing a deletion of the Nup1 FXFG domain (nup1ΔFXFG) in combination with nud1-G585E, bub2Δ, and bfa1Δ mutations and examined the resulting cells for growth phenotypes. All of the cells containing deletions of nud1, bfa1, or bub2 in combination with nup1ΔFXFG are viable (Table 2), suggesting that MEN/nup1Δ synthetic lethality is independent of the karyopherin-binding Nup1 FXFG repeats.
Given the genetic connections we observed between Nup1, Bfa1, and Bub2, we also examined whether mutations altering Nup1 function resulted in changes in Bfa1 or Bub2 localization. Interestingly, we were unable to successfully introduce either a Bfa1-GFP or Bub2-GFP containing plasmid into nup1Δ cells (data not shown). We were able to obtain expression of Bfa1-GFP and Bub2-GFP in nup1ΔFXFG cells and the intracellular distribution of both fusion proteins appeared identical to the localization observed in wild type cells (Fig. 5b).
Cells lacking the nucleoporin Nup1 exhibit defects in cell structure and function, including nuclear transport of proteins and RNAs, nuclear envelope morphology, nuclear inheritance, and microtubule organization (Bogerd et al. 1994; Schlaich and Hurt 1995; Fischer et al. 2002). We have previously described a large-scale genetic screen used to identify mutations that are synthetically lethal with a deletion of NUP1 (Belanger et al. 1994). Seventeen nup1Δ lethal (nle) mutants were isolated in this screen, representing 16 complementation groups. Six of the nles are alleles of genes encoding proteins involved in nuclear transport and/or NPC function. In this work, we report the cloning of nle6 and its identification as a temperature-sensitive allele of NUD1, an important component of the yeast spindle pole body and regulator of activation of the mitotic exit network. We also identify deletions of the SPB and MEN components Bfa1 and Bub2 as synthetically lethal with nup1Δ. Thus, nle6/nud1-G585E, bfa1Δ, and bub2Δ represent the first nles without a previously identified role in nuclear transport or NPC function and provide a potential link between Nup1 and the activity of the SPB and/or MEN.
Recently, a number of significant connections have been made between the NPC and cellular processes other than nucleocytoplasmic transport (see Fahrenkrog et al. 2004 for review), including links to SPB and MEN function in yeast. Ndc1 is a transmembrane protein that localizes to both NPCs and SPBs and is important for assembly of both of these massive complexes spanning the nuclear envelope (Chial et al. 1998; Lau et al. 2004; Madrid et al. 2006). The yeast centrin Cdc31 is a SPB-associated protein that is important for SPB duplication (Baum et al. 1986; Spang et al. 1993) and has recently been shown to be an important component of the Sac3-Thp1 mRNA export complex that binds Nup1 and Nup60 at the nucleoplasmic face of NPCs and plays an important role in mRNA export (Fischer et al. 2002, 2004). Additionally, the Mlp2 protein is associated with the nucleoplasmic face of the NPC, but also binds the SPB components Spc29, Spc42, and Spc110 and is important for SPB structure and function (Niepel et al. 2005). Our data describing a synthetic interaction between nup1Δ and mutations in NUD1, BFA1, and BUB2 provide additional genetic evidence for a link between Nup1 and SPB function. Interestingly, Nup1 is located exclusively on the nucleoplasmic face of the NPC, while Nud1, Bfa1, and Bub2 all associate with the cytoplasmic plaque of the SPB, making a direct physical interaction between Nup1 and these SPB components unlikely.
NPC components are also important in cell cycle regulation. The NPC participates in cell cycle progression in part by functioning as a passageway for the nucleocytoplasmic relocalization of specific proteins important for cell cycle control, such as the Swi6 transcription factor and the Cdc14 phosphatase (Queralt and Igual 2003; Harreman et al. 2004; Carmo-Fonseca et al. 2000). The yeast NPC itself undergoes a structural reorganization during mitosis that allows for altered nucleocytoplasmic transport of some proteins involved in mitotic progression (Makhnevych et al. 2003). Thus, the NPC functions to regulate the cell cycle in part via regulation of the nucleocytoplasmic localization of specific proteins important for cell cycle progression. Several genetic interactions have been identified that link specific nucleoporins and nuclear transport factors to MEN function in the cell cycle. Alleles of NUP170 and CDC14 were both isolated in a screen designed to identify mutations that have increased sensitivity to Cln2 overexpression (Yuste-Rojas and Cross 2000), alleles encoding the karyopherins Kap60, Mtr10, and Kap104 were isolated as suppressors of cdc15 mutants (Shou and Deshaies 2002; Asakawa and Toh-e 2002), and Kap104 appears to function to stimulate Cdc14 activity and thus exit from mitosis (Asakawa and Toh-e 2002). Thus, the synthetic interaction between nup1Δ and MEN components described here may be the result of changes in nucleocytoplasmic transport. The lack of a nucleoporin such as Nup1 may alter the import or export of a factor or factors necessary for cell cycle progression in the absence of early MEN components, resulting in an inability to progress through the cell cycle.
Nud1 is a structural protein located on the outer plaque of the SPB on the cytoplasmic side of the nuclear envelope and also acts as scaffolding for the MEN (Wigge et al. 1998; Adams and Kilmartin 1999). Bub2 and Bfa1 are bound to the SPB as a complex by Nud1, where they act as a GTPase activating protein (GAP) to inhibit Tem1 (Gruneberg et al. 2000; Geymonat et al. 2002). The daughter-cell-specific Lte1 acts as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) to activate Tem1 and facilitate its sequestering of Cdc15 to the daughter SPB (Wang et al. 2000; Gruneberg et al. 2000; Pereira et al. 2002). Here, Cdc15 stimulates the kinase activity of the Dbf2–Mob1 complex, which is also found in high concentrations at the daughter SPB (Cid et al. 2002). Activation of the Dbf2–Mob1 complex allows for total release of the Cdc14 phosphatase from the nucleolus into the cytoplasm, where it functions to reverse Cdk-dependent phosphorylation, inhibit mitotic Cdks and allow mitotic exit (Pereira et al. 2002; Visintin et al. 1998).
The synthetic interactions observed for nup1Δ with nud1-G585E, bfa1Δ, and bub2Δ suggest a functional interaction between Nup1 and components of the SPB and early MEN. The genetic interactions between this particular nucleoporin and SPB/early MEN components appear to be quite specific, as other nucleoporins and SPB/MEN components tested do not exhibit synthetic lethality (Table 2). Since proteins of the MEN are mostly localized to the cytoplasm, there is a physical separation between these and the Nup1 localized at the nuclear basket. While a direct physical link between Nup1 and the MEN components is unlikely, the shuttling between the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm of specific factors required for mitotic exit could implicate these proteins in the same functional pathway. Cdc14, a critical component of the MEN, is sequestered in the nucleolus during much of the cell cycle, but must be exported into the cytoplasm to function in mitotic exit and thus nup1Δ mutants could alter Cdc14-mediated cell cycle progression (Carmo-Fonseca et al. 2000; Trautmann and McCollum 2005). However, although Nup1 could potentially facilitate nuclear export of Cdc14, it appears Cdc14 is exported by Crm1, an exportin that has not been shown to interact with Nup1 (Bembenek et al. 2005).
The specificity of the synthetic interaction between nup1Δ and components that function early in the MEN pathway, but not late MEN components, might provide some insight into the functional basis for this genetic interaction. Nud1, Bfa1, and Bub2 all function as negative regulators of cell cycle progression, acting to retain Tem1 in its inactive, GDP-bound state. The loss of this negative regulation may lead to an increased likelihood of cells exiting mitosis prematurely under some conditions (Bosl and Li 2005). Mutations in nup1 not only affect nucleocytoplasmic transport, but also result in altered microtubule organization and aberrant nuclear inheritance, leading to an increase in multinucleate and anucleate daughter cells (Bogerd et al. 1994). Failure to regulate exit from mitosis under such conditions may lead to an increase in inviable daughter progeny. In contrast, the late MEN mutants tested (lte1Δ, dbf2Δ, swi5Δ) all encode proteins that stimulate mitotic progression (Bosl and Li 2005). Reduced amounts of these factors due to gene deletion could potentially result in a delay in progression that would allow appropriate chromosome segregation in a fraction of nup1Δ mutant cells, resulting in apparent viability of the nup1Δ/late MEN double mutants.
The genetic interactions presented here suggest that Nup1 may play a novel role in connection with the SPB and MEN. General defects in nucleocytoplasmic transport in nup1Δ do not seem to account for the connection. It is possible that specific Nup1-mediated transport of MEN proteins results in the genetic interactions between nup1Δ and mutants of the SPB/MEN. Careful localization of Cdc14 throughout the cell cycle in nup1Δ and other nucleoporin mutants may be necessary to elucidate whether nuclear transport is important for Cdc14 and MEN function and whether specific Nups are essential for this transport. Alternatively, Nup1 may function in mitotic progression via the MEN independently of its role in nucleocytoplasmic transport.
The authors acknowledge S. Wente, J. Kilmartin, E. Schiebel, R. Li, N. Shulga, and D. Goldfarb for their generous sharing of yeast strains and plasmids. They also thank S. Geier, M. Gordon, and L. Parris for technical assistance and K. G. Belanger, M. Pettit, and K. Kokanovich for critical reading of this manuscript. Support for this work was provided by National Institutes of Health grant GM-65107 to K.D.B., Colgate summer undergraduate research fellowships to N.C.H. and N.T.A-G., and funding from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in support of Colgate’s off-campus undergraduate research program at the NIH. M.B. was supported by funds from the Intramural Research Program of the NIH and NCI.