Skip to main content
Log in

Unified approach to partition functions of RNA secondary structures

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

RNA secondary structure formation is a field of considerable biological interest as well as a model system for understanding generic properties of heteropolymer folding. This system is particularly attractive because the partition function and thus all thermodynamic properties of RNA secondary structure ensembles can be calculated numerically in polynomial time for arbitrary sequences and homopolymer models admit analytical solutions. Such solutions for many different aspects of the combinatorics of RNA secondary structure formation share the property that the final solution depends on differences of statistical weights rather than on the weights alone. Here, we present a unified approach to a large class of problems in the field of RNA secondary structure formation. We prove a generic theorem for the calculation of RNA folding partition functions. Then, we show that this approach can be applied to the study of the molten-native transition, denaturation of RNA molecules, as well as to studies of the glass phase of random RNA sequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P (2002) Molecular biology of the cell. Garland Science, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundschuh R, Hwa T (1999) RNA structure formation: a solvable model of heteropolymer folding. Phys Rev Lett 83:1479–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundschuh R, Hwa T (2002a) Phases of the secondary structure of RNA sequences. Europhys Lett 59: 903–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundschuh R, Hwa T (2002b) Statistical mechanics of secondary structures formed by random RNA sequences. Phys Rev E 65:031903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundschuh R, Gerland U (2006) Dynamics of intramolecular recognition: base-pairing in DNA/RNA near and far from equilibrium. Eur Phys J E 19:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David F, Wiese KJ (2007) Systematic field theory of the RNA glass transition. Phys Rev Lett 98:128102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y, Chan CY, Lawrence CE (2004) Sfold web server for statistical folding and rational design of nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W135–W141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Gennes PG (1968) Statistics of branching and hairpin helices for the dAT copolymer. Biopolymers 6:715–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Attar R (2006) Lecture notes on \(Z\)-transform. Lulu Press Inc., Morrisville

  • Gō N (1983) Theoretical studies of protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 12:183–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jury EI (1973) Theory and application of the \(Z\)-transform method. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., Huntington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann AK (2001) Comment on “Glassy transition in a disordered model for the RNA secondary structure”. Phys Rev Lett 86:1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs PG (1996) Overlaps between RNA secondary structures. Phys Rev Lett 76:704–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs PG (2000) RNA secondary structure: physical and computational aspects. Q Rev Biophys 33:199–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofacker IL, Fontana W, Stadler PF, Bonhoeffer S, Tacker M, Schuster P (1994) Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures. Monatshefte f Chemie 125:167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui S, Tang LH (2006) Ground state and glass transition of the RNA secondary structure. Eur Phys J B 53:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lässig M, Wiese KJ (2006) Freezing of random RNA. Phys Rev Lett 96:228101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Bundschuh R (2005) Quantification of the differences between quenched and annealed averaging for RNA secondary structures. Phys Rev E 72:061905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinari E, Pagnani A, Ricci-Tersenghi F (2002) Zero-temperature properties of RNA secondary structures. Phys Rev E 65:041919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews DH, Sabina J, Zuker M, Turner DH (1999) Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. J Mol Biol 288:911–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaskill JS (1990) The equilibrium partition function and base pair binding probabilities for RNA secondary structure. Biopolymers 29:1105–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monthus C, Garel T (2007) Freezing transition of the random bond RNA model: statistical properties of the pairing weights. Phys Rev E 75:031103

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moroz D, Hwa T (1999) Toy model of heteropolymer interactions and denaturation. In: Bulletin of the 1999 March Meeting of the American Physical Society, SC31.14

  • Nebel ME (2003) Combinatorial properties of RNA secondary structures. J Comput Biol 3:541–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagnani A, Parisi G, Ricci-Tersenghi F (2000) Glassy transition in a disordered model for the RNA secondary structure. Phys Rev Lett 84:2026–2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagnani A, Parisi G, Ricci-Tersenghi F (2001) Pagnani, Parisi, and Ricci-Tersenghi Reply. Phys Rev Lett 86:1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinoco I Jr, Bustamante C (1999) How RNA folds. J Mol Biol 293:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman MS (1978) Secondary structure of single-stranded nucleic acids. In: Studies in foundations and combinatorics. Advances in Mathematics Supplementary Studies, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 167–212

  • Xayaphoummine A, Bucher T, Isambert H (2005) Kinefold web server for RNA/DNA folding path and structure prediction including pseudoknots and knots. Nucleic Acids Res 33:605–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuker M, Stiegler P (1981) Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucleic Acids Res 9:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuker M (2003) Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3406–3415

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge countless interactions on which this work is based with Terry Hwa. In addition, I would like to acknowledge discussions and collaborations with Robijn Bruinsma, Tsunglin Liu, David Moroz, Lei-Han Tang, and Michael Zuker that contributed to this work. I would like to thank the Aspen Center for Theoretical Physics where the idea for the theorem presented here was conceived. Lastly, I would like to acknowledge support by the US National Science Foundation under DMR Grants 0706002 and 1105458.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Bundschuh.

Appendix A: Molten partition function for even length

Appendix A: Molten partition function for even length

In this appendix we calculate the \(z\)-transform of the molten phase transition function for even sequence length only. For clarity we suppress the argument \(q\) in all partition functions and understand that all partition functions depend on the Boltzmann factor \(q\).

We will actually calculate the \(z\)-transforms for even and odd sequence lengths simultaneously and start by defining

$$\begin{aligned} E(N)\equiv G(2N-1)\quad {\mathrm{and}}\quad O(N)\equiv G(2N) \end{aligned}$$

for \(N\ge 1\) (note, that odd arguments of \(G\) correspond to chains of an even length and vice versa). Here, \(G(N)\) is the molten phase partition function introduced in Sect. 2.4. These quantities have \(z\)-transforms

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{E}(z)\equiv \sum _{N=1}^\infty E(N)z^{-N}\quad {\mathrm{and}}\quad \widehat{O}(z)\equiv \sum _{N=1}^\infty O(N)z^{-N}. \end{aligned}$$

By their construction we have the relation

$$\begin{aligned} z\widehat{E}(z^2)+\widehat{O}(z^2)=\!\!\!\sum _{N=1}^\infty G(2N-1)z^{-(2N-1)} +\!\sum _{N=1}^\infty G(2N)z^{-2N}\!=\widehat{G}(z).\qquad \quad \end{aligned}$$
(23)

Let us additionally insert \(N=2n-1\) for \(n\ge 2\) into Eq. (5). This gives us

$$\begin{aligned} O(n)&= E(n)+q\sum _{k=1}^{2n-2}G(k)G(2n-1-k)\\&= E(n)+q\sum _{k=1}^{n-1}G(2k-1)G(2n-2k)+q \sum _{k=1}^{n-1}G(2k)G(2n-2k-1)\\&= E(n)+2q\sum _{k=1}^{n-1}G(2k-1)G(2n-2k) =E(n)+2q\sum _{k=1}^{n-1}E(k)O(n-k). \end{aligned}$$

Multiplying this equation by \(z^{-n}\), summing over all \(n\ge 2\) and adding \(z^{-1}\) on both sides yields

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{O}(z)=\widehat{E}(z)+2q\widehat{E}(z)\widehat{O}(z) \end{aligned}$$

which in turn can be rewritten as

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{O}(z)=\frac{\widehat{E}(z)}{1-2q\widehat{E}(z)}. \end{aligned}$$
(24)

If we insert this into Eq. (23) we get the equation

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{G}(\sqrt{z})=\sqrt{z}\widehat{E}(z) +\frac{\widehat{E}(z)}{1-2q\widehat{E}(z)} \end{aligned}$$

for \(\widehat{E}(z)\). This is a quadratic equation for \(\widehat{E}(z)\). Inserting the explicit expression (8) for \(\widehat{G}(z)\) this quadratic equation can be solved explicitly with the result

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{E}(z)=\frac{1}{2q}-\frac{1}{4q\sqrt{z}}\left[ \sqrt{(\sqrt{z}-1)^2-4q}+\sqrt{(\sqrt{z}+1)^2-4q}\right] . \end{aligned}$$
(25)

The other solution with a minus sign between the two square roots has to be excluded, since \(\widehat{O}(z)>0\) and \(\widehat{E}(z)>0\) for real and positive \(z\) and thus, according to Eq. (24), \(\widehat{E}(z)<1/(2q)\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bundschuh, R. Unified approach to partition functions of RNA secondary structures. J. Math. Biol. 69, 1129–1150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-013-0737-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-013-0737-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation