Skip to main content
Log in

Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection with diversity feature loss and arbitrary split systems

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arising in the context of biodiversity conservation, the Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection (BNRS) problem is to select, subject to budgetary constraints, a set of regions to conserve so that the phylogenetic diversity (PD) of the set of species contained within those regions is maximized. Here PD is measured across either a single rooted tree or a single unrooted tree. Nevertheless, in both settings, this problem is NP-hard. However, it was recently shown that, for each setting, there is a polynomial-time \({(1-\frac{1}{e})}\) -approximation algorithm for it and that this algorithm is tight. In the first part of the paper, we consider two extensions of BNRS. In the rooted setting we additionally allow for the disappearance of features, for varying survival probabilities across species, and for PD to be measured across multiple trees. In the unrooted setting, we extend to arbitrary split systems. We show that, despite these additional allowances, there remains a polynomial-time \({(1-\frac{1}{e})}\) -approximation algorithm for each extension. In the second part of the paper, we resolve a complexity problem on computing PD across an arbitrary split system left open by Spillner et al.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bordewich M, Rodrigo AD, Semple C (2008) Selecting taxa to save or sequence: desirable criteria and a greedy solution. Syst Biol 57: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordewich M, Semple C (2008) Nature reserve selection problem: a tight approximation algorithm. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinforma 5: 275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant D, Huson D (2006) Applications of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23: 254–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP (1994) Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity. Philos Trans Biol Sci 345: 45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faller B (2010) Combinatorial and probabilistic methods in biodiversity theory. Dissertation, University of Canterbury

  • Feige U (1998) A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. J ACM 45: 634–652

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Minh BQ, Klaere S, von Haeseler A (2009) Taxon selection under split diversity. Syst Biol 58: 586–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minh BQ, Klaere S, von Haeseler A (2010) SDA*: a simple and unifying solution to recent bioinformatic challenges for conservation genetics. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on knowledge and systems engineering, pp 33–37

  • Moritz C, Faith DP (1998) Comparative phylogeography and the identification of genetically divergent areas for conservation. Mol Ecol 7: 419–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton V, Semple C, Steel M (2007) Optimizing phylogenetic diversity under constraints. J Theor Biol 246: 186–194

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nemhauser GL, Wolsey LA, Fisher ML (1978) An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I. Math Program 14: 265–294

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pardi F, Goldman N (2005) Species choice for comparative genomics: being greedy works. PLoS Genet 1: e71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardi F, Goldman N (2007) Resource-aware taxon selection for maximizing phylogenetic diversity. Syst Biol 56: 431–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Gaston KJ (2002) Maximising phylogenetic diversity in the selection of networks of conservation areas. Biol Conserv 105: 103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Brooks TM, Gaston KJ (2005) Integrating phylogenetic diversity in the selection of priority areas for conservation: does it make a difference. In: Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Brooks T (eds) Phylogeny and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TB, Holder K, Girman D, O’Keefe K, Larison B, Chan Y (2000) Comparative avian phylogeography of Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea mountains: implications for conservation. Mol Ecol 9: 1505–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillner A, Nguyen B, Moulton V (2008) Computing phylogenetic diversity for split systems. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinforma 5: 235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel M (2005) Phylogenetic diversity and the greedy algorithm. Syst Biol 54: 527–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sviridenko M (2004) A note on maximizing a submodular set function subject to a knapsack constraint. Oper Res Lett 32: 41–43

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Semple.

Additional information

M. Bordewich was supported by the EPSRC, while C. Semple was supported by the New Zealand Marsden Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bordewich, M., Semple, C. Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection with diversity feature loss and arbitrary split systems. J. Math. Biol. 64, 69–85 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-011-0405-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-011-0405-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation