Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) urogenital infection and its serotype distribution from clinical samples in north-eastern Croatia. During a 3-year period, 2,379 urogenital samples were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (A group), while 4,846 genital swabs were analyzed by direct fluorescent antibody test (B group). 132 Ct positive specimens were genotyped by omp1 gene sequencing. The prevalence rate of Ct was 3.2 % in A and 1 % in B group. The most prevalent chlamydial genotype was E (44 %), followed by F (33 %), K (11.5 %), G (8 %), J/UW (5.3 %), D-IC (4.4 %), D-B120 (1.8 %), and B/IU, J/IU, Ia/IU (0.9 % each) serotypes. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of omp1 gene were detected in E, K, and G serotypes. Some of these SNPs (C/T at position 272 and G/A at position 813 in E strain; C/T at position 884 in D strain) might represent novel omp1 variants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) is one of the leading causes of sexually transmitted diseases (STD) worldwide. This obligate intracellular Gram-negative bacterium causes a wide range of clinical infections: prostatitis and epididymitis in men, cervicitis and salpingitis in women and proctitis, lymphogranuloma venerum (LGV), trachoma, conjunctivitis and reactive arthritis in both sexes [31]. WHO data reported 90 million cases of infection with Ct in the world each year, including 4 million in the United States of America and 5.5 million in Europe. However, the documented cases encompass only a fraction of the infected individuals because 50 % of the infected males and 80 % of the infected females have asymptomatic infection [56]. Untreated asymptomatic infection can cause irreversible pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) leading to tubal infertility, ectopic pregnancy, chronic urethritis, and chronic pelvic pain [51]. Due to lack of efficient human vaccines, early detection and antibiotic treatment of Ct infection remain the main strategy for reduction of late complications.
Genetic variability of Ct could be one of the reasons for its wide tropism and difficulty in detection and eradication. There are at least 19 chlamydial serotypes found worldwide. Serotypes are defined by mutations in one of the four variable domains (VD1–4) of omp1 gene. It codes for the highly abundant and immunogenic outer membrane protein MOMP, whose epitopes have been intensely studied in vaccine development [17, 20, 29, 30]. For example, serotypes A, B, and C have usually been associated with ocular trachoma, serotypes L1, L2, and L3 with LGV, while serotypes D to K have mostly been associated with urogenital and neonatorum infections [17, 20, 29, 30]. In addition, presence of ocular strains in the genital tract and vice versa was also reported [13] suggesting broad Ct tropism. Omp1 gene sequence also changes through single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and through gene recombination. The latter was observed in populations with high rates of multiple infections with different Ct strains [14, 29, 34].
A large fraction of urogenital chlamydia infections, particularly those with E and K serotypes, fail to show any clinical symptoms and remain undetected for years [37]. For example, K serotype does not productively infect peripheral blood monocytes. However, K serotype chlamydia cells spread into the whole organism via monocytes in a Trojan-horse manner leading to long-term consequences such as arthritis [46]. Thus, the more is known about the Ct serotype distribution in local population, the easier it will be to develop strategies such as public awareness, routine screenings, vaccination, etc. to diminish chlamydia-related health issues.
Surprisingly, no research study has so far analyzed Ct serotype distribution in Croatia. Thus, objective of this work was to determine the prevalence of Ct serotypes and correlate them with gender and age. Initial Ct screening of urogenital clinical samples from the Osijek-Baranya County was performed using the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based or direct fluorescent antibody (DFA)-based methods. Chlamydia positive samples were then genotyped by omp1 gene-based sequencing and BLAST alignment.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
Study Group A
Between March 2007 and January 2010, 449 urines (349 male and 100 female) and 501 urethral swabs (from men) were collected at the Microbiology department of the Institution of Public Health Osijek-Baranya County, while 1,430 cervical swabs were provided by gynecologist’s offices from the Osijek-Baranya County. Collection of specimens was performed according to the COBAS TaqMan real-time PCR instrument CT Test instructions (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). The mean age of 1,530 female and 850 male patients was 34 ± 11.2 years (range 18–78) and 39 ± 12.9 years (range 18–83), respectively.
Study Group B
Between January 2009 and January 2010, 3,377 cervical and 1,469 urethral swabs were collected according to the MicroTrak Direct Fluorescence Antigen (DFA) test instructions (MicroTrak, Trinity Biotech, USA). The mean age of 3,377 female and 1,469 male patients was 34 ± 11.2 years (range 18–80), and 40 ± 13.5 years (range 18–81), respectively.
All patients in this study had typically symptomatic urogenital infections and were referred to our department by their general practitioners, gynecologists, or other medical specialists. Table 1 shows study groups A and B in relation to sex, initial diagnosis, and Ct infection rate. Informed consent was obtained from all Ct processed patients and the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Public Health for Osijek-Baranya County approved the study. The patients who had Ct urogenital infection were treated with appropriate antibiotics. Once the Ct positive patients completed antibiotic treatment, they were requested to come for a check-up.
Ct Detection
DNA from the study group A patients was isolated using AMPLICOR CT/NG Specimen Preparation Kit and analyzed for Ct presence by COBAS TaqMan CT test (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) and COBAS TaqMan Analyzer. Ct positive urines and swab specimens were stored at −20 °C until DNA extraction for subsequent Ct genotyping.
Specimens from the study group B patients were analyzed by MicroTrak test (Trinity Biotech, USA) and positive DFA microscopic slides were stored at +4 °C until DNA extraction.
Ct Serotyping
DNA from the Ct positive study group A patients was isolated from 140 μl of urine using QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) or from 200 μl M4RT (Remel, USA) urethral and cervical swabs using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). All steps were performed in duplicates and 50 μl of eluted DNA was stored in aliquots at −20 °C for subsequent genotyping. DNA from the Ct positive study group B patients was prepared by scraping MicroTrack glass microscope slides for 15–20 times in 1.5 ml of ultra pure water and spinning at 11,500 rpm for 20 min at 25 °C. After resuspension of cell pellet in 600 μl 1× GIBCO™ phosphate-buffered saline buffer (PBS), pH 7.4 (Invitrogen, USA) and vigorous vortexing for 3 min, DNA was isolated using QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany) with following modifications: 2 μl polyadenylic acid (Amersham, Biosciences, USA) (conc. 1 μg/ml AE buffer) was used for each sample and DNA was eluted with 50 μl of the kit-provided elution buffer.
Initial PCR amplification of omp1 gene (1,100 bp fragment, P1/OMP2 primers [20]) was followed by nested PCR (990 bp fragment, MOMP87/RVS1059 primers [48]). The 50 μl PCR mix contained 10 μl of DNA extracted from urine and swabs (or 3 μl from the initial PCR), 0.4 μM of primers, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate and 1 unit of Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, USA). PCR was performed in Applied Biosystems 9700 thermal cycler using following conditions: denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min; 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C (or 60 °C in nested PCR) for 30 s, 72 °C for 90 s; final elongation at 72 °C for 7 min. Amplification products were separated on 1.7 % agarose gels, stained with SYBRSafe DNA stain (Invitrogen, USA) and visualized with UV light. The MassRuler™ Low Range DNA Ladder (Fermentas GMBH, Germany) was included in each electrophoresis.
Both Omp1 amplicons (1,100 and 990 bp) were purified using Qiaquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and sequenced using BigDye v3.1 terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) and Applied Biosystems 3130 Genetic Analyzer. Each PCR product was sequenced twice in both directions. Sequencing primers are shown in Table 2.
Obtained consensus sequences were aligned using the SeqScape v2.5 software (Applied Biosystems, USA) and screened against the library constructed from the reference strains of Ct using the BLAST search tool at the National Center for Biotechnology Information, GenBank http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/ accession number in parentheses: A/Sa1 (M58938), B/TW-5 (M17342), B/IU-1226 (AF063208), C/TW3 (M17343), D/B-120 (X62918), D/IC-Cal8 (X62920), E/Bour (X52557), F/IC-Cal3 (X52080), G/UW57 (AF063199), H/Wash (= H/UW4) (X16007), I/UW-12 (AF063200), Ia/IU-4168 (AF063201), J/UW36 (AF063202), Ja/IU-A795 (AF063203), K/UW31 (AF063204), L1/440 (M36533), L2/434 (M14738), and L3/404 (X55700).
Statistical Analysis
The prevalence of chlamydial urogenital infection and its relation to age and sex was calculated using Statistica 8.0 software (StatSoft) and differences between prevalence in relation to age and sex were analyzed using χ2 test (Figs. 1,2). Difference was considered significant when p < 0.05. The Ct genotype distribution in relation to sex was analyzed with Microsoft Office Excel 2003 (Microsoft) (Fig. 3).
Results
Age- and Sex-Dependent Prevalence of Chlamydial Urogenital Infection in North-East Croatia
The gender-specific prevalences of chlamydial urogenital infection of patients from the study groups A and B are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. Both study groups showed similar trends in chlamydial prevalence: (i) men had higher Ct incidence then women; (ii) young male and female patients showed the highest Ct prevalence (3.7 and 2.6 %, respectively) while patients older than 41 had the lowest Ct prevalence.
Statistical analysis of chlamydial infection based on the real-time PCR-based COBAS TaqMan Ct analysis of 449 urine, 501 urethral, and 1,430 cervical swab specimens (study group A) is shown in Fig. 1. Men showed almost two-fold higher Ct prevalence then women (4.1 vs. 2.6 %, respectively, p = 0.044). The most significant differences in Ct prevalence between men and women were found in age groups 26–30 years (7 vs. 2.5 %, p = 0.017) and under 20 years (15.8 vs. 2.1 %, p = 0.008). The highest incidence of Ct infection was detected in young subjects, that is, in men under 20 years (15.8 %) and in 21–25 years old women (5.5 %). The oldest category in our study, patients above 41 years, showed the lowest incidence of Ct infection both in men and women (1.4 vs. 0.5 %, respectively) (Fig. 1). Similar age- and gender-dependent trends in Ct prevalence were observed in 1,469 urethral and 3,377 cervical swabs (study group B) that were analyzed by the antibody-based MicroTrak DFA method (Fig. 2). Young male and female patients showed the highest Ct prevalence (3.7 and 2.6 %, respectively) while older than 41 patients had the lowest Ct prevalence although the difference in age- and gender-Ct prevalence was not statistically significant (Fig. 2).
Distribution of Chlamydia Serotypes
We successfully genotyped 93.3 % of specimens (i.e., 70 out of 75 from study group A) and 95.6 % (i.e., 43 out of 45 from study group B) that were found to be Ct positive by either MicroTrak DFA or COBAS TaqMan Ct method. Genotyping was performed by sequencing the 990 bp-long amplicon of the omp1 gene that was synthesized either by one-step PCR (in 71.5 % of cases) or by nested PCR (in 17.1 % of cases) using DNA isolated from 48 males and 65 females. 6.7 % (study group A) and 4.4 % (study group B) of specimens failed to be amplified and genotyped. Sequencing and BLAST alignment analysis revealed that the most prevalent chlamydial genotypes corresponded to serotype E (44 %), followed by F (23 %), K (11.5 %), G (8 %), J/UW (5.3 %), D-IC (4.4 %), D-B120 (1.8 %) and B/IU, J/IU, Ia/IU (0.9 % each). In total, the genotypes E, F, and K accounted for 77.9 % of infections in both genders.
Distribution of Ct genotypes in relation to the sex of infected subjects is shown in Fig. 3. Genotype F was more found in men than in women, while the genotypes E and K were found more often in women than in men. Genotypes B/IU and D/B120 showed gender discrepancies.
Omp1 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms
Omp1 gene sequences of 86 % of chlamydia positive clinical specimens (i.e., 97 out of 113) were identical to reference sequences for Ct serotypes/strains deposited in the NCBI database (Table 3). The remaining 14 % of chlamydia strains (i.e., 16 out of 113) showed SNPs in omp1 gene. Interestingly, for some of the omp1 gene variants we did not find corresponding GenBank sequences and thus they might represent novel genetic variants of omp1 gene (Table 3). Finally, we did not detect multiple chlamydial serotypes in the same clinical specimens neither any signs of omp1 recombination.
We found a single C/T or G/A nucleotide substitution in omp1 gene in 4 % of E strains (2 out of 50), causing a potential missense or nonsense mutation, respectively (Table 3). For both of these SNPs no corresponding sequences were found in the NCBI database (September 2011). All F strains (25 out of 25) were identical to the NCBI reference sequence. 3 % of K genotypes (4 out of 13) displayed a C/A mutation, identical to AM901164 NCBI sequence. All G genotypes detected in our clinical samples contained SNPs in omp1 gene. These SNPs corresponded either to a T/G (in 8 out of 9 cases) or G/A (in 1 out of 9 cases) substitution. While for the former we did not find corresponding sequence in the NCBI database, the latter was identical to two NCBI entries (AM901158 and CP001888). 2 % of D-IC genotypes (1 out of 5) showed C/T nucleotide substitution that was not found in the NCBI database.
Discussion
This study is the first to determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the Osijek-Baranya County, a north-eastern region of Croatia. When compared to previous studies in Croatia, the overall (both sexes, all age categories) Ct prevalence in our study was similar to that in Zagreb (3 vs. 2 %) [19]. In addition, Ct prevalence in young men in our study (7.3 %) was comparable to previous reports in Zagreb (~11 %) and across Croatia (5.9 %) [6, 19]. However, young women from Zagreb showed higher tendency to become infected then women from the Osijek-Baranya County (7 and 16.4 % vs. 2.1 % in women <20 as in [16, 19]; 11 vs. 5.5 % in 21–25 years old women as in [19]). This is probably due to earlier or more frequent sexual interaction in urban areas and not due to different detection methods since both Jarža-Danila et al. and our studies employed a PCR-based approach.
When compared to Europe, men from our study showed relatively low Ct prevalence. For example, Ct infection rate in Croatian men (4.1 %) was lower than in Norway (7.8–19.6 %), Scotland (9.8 %), Sweden (10 %), UK (9.5–13.3 %), the Netherlands (12.3 %), Bulgaria (25 %), Poland (40 %) and was similar to Switzerland (1.2–7.5 %) [32]. On the other hand, Ct prevalence of women from our study (2.1 %) was similar to that in Spain (1 %) [24], Belgium (1.4 %) [52, 54], Slovenia (1.6 %) [22], England (1.7 %) [24, 54], but was lower than in Poland (3.2 %) [12], Greece (3.5 %) [28], Italy (3.9 %) [24], Republic of Macedonia (~4 %) [47], Netherlands (4.4 %) [24], Turkey (4.9 %) [44], Hungary (5.1 %) [38], Bulgaria (6.1 %) [24], Lithuania (8.4 %) [24], and France (17 %) [54]. As most of these studies examined asymptomatic women whereas our study included only symptomatic ones, this further straightens our observation that women of the Osijek-Baranya County show generally lower Ct prevalence then women in other European regions.
We find that population younger than 25 is at the highest risk of Ct infection as noted previously [24, 26, 54]. Sexual activity (especially in early age), early age of menarche, new or several sexual partners, unmarried status and inconsistent use of condoms are additional risk factors [16, 24, 42].
Ct infection monitoring of pregnant women is not obligatory in Croatia. Since pregnant women younger than 20 years show higher prevalence of Ct infection than non-pregnant women [5], there is a high possibility of its transmission during delivery. Consequences such as neonatal conjunctivitis, nasopharyngeal infection, and chlamydial pneumonia have already been detected in Croatian newborns [2]. In order to prevent it and, ultimately, decrease the medical treatment expenses, we suggest that Ct monitoring becomes a compulsory test during pregnancy.
Ct serotype distribution in north-east Croatia is similar to trends in Europe and USA. Almost half of the chlamydia infected urogenital samples was E serotypic (44 %), followed by F, K, and G serotypes. Similar levels of E and F prevalence were detected in Swedish [7, 11, 20], American [15], and Dutch [35] studies. Asian population, to the contrary, is mainly F serotypic (25–29 %), followed by E (9–20 %) and D (14–23 %) serotypes [18, 34, 50]. This inconsistency may be caused by different Ct serotype distribution in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic population as well as the different laboratory methods used for Ct serotyping. Swedish men show low (1.4 %) [20], Croatian men show moderate (10.4 %, our study) and Greek and Italian men show more abundant G serotype prevalence (23 and 19 %, respectively) [10, 40]. Dutch men with symptomatic urogenital infection show more H serotype (2.4 vs. 0 %) but less K serotype (2.5 vs. 8.3 %) than men in our study [35]. Similarly to men, E serotype was also a predominant serotype in Croatian women. Moreover, levels of E and F serotypes in Croatian symptomatic women were similar to symptomatic women in Sweden [13] and Australia [27]. In summary, unlike more stable levels of E and F serotype, prevalence of G, H, and K serotypes appear to vary across Europe.
Whether there is a gender-specific distribution of Ct serotypes is still a controversial question. Some studies reported differences in the Ct serotype distribution between men and women [49, 55] while others found no difference [33].We indeed detected a disproportion of F, E, and K serotypes in relation to sex, similarly to the Seattle study [49].
Contrary to several studies [3, 8, 18, 34, 55], we did not detect any case of infection by mixed Ct serotypes. There might be several reasons to it: (i) our sequencing method was not enough sensitive due to, for example, large differences in proportions of each serotype [3], (ii) the source of the tested population—the majority of our specimens were obtained from physicians and gynecologists and not from the STD clinics. Therefore, future studies should readdress this question through, for example, analysis of high-risk population such as adolescents and/or highly sexually active or promiscuous individuals.
Similarly to others, we also noticed that K and G chlamydia genotypes are the least stable and contain several SNPs in omp1 gene [33]. We found one, previously unreported, mutation proximal to VD4 region of omp1 gene in K strain [17, 20, 30, 41]. We also detected two known SNPs in VD4 and VD2 region in G strain [20, 23, 30, 36]. To the contrary, E genotype was not only the most abundant but also the most stable genotype in our population [20, 43]. Only 4 % of E strains contained the omp1 gene SNPs (in VD1 and VD4 regions) and one of them has not yet been reported [11, 17, 20, 29, 30]. To summarize, we detected three novel mutations in the omp1 gene and further studies should be aimed to independently verify our observations.
The major limitation of our study (and other studies relying on clinical samples) is that asymptomatic infection remained largely undetected. Asymptomatic infection facilitates chlamydial spread, augments infection reservoir and may cause infertility and ectopic pregnancies. Moreover, asymptomatic individuals are more susceptible to human papillomavirus (HPV) [45] and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections [25]. Consequences of asymptomatic and/or untreated Ct infections increase the costs of health care interventions [25]. Only in USA, the 1997 annual cost of Ct treatment exceeded 2.4 billion dollars [4] whereas in England, the 1998 annual cost exceeded 50 million pounds [53]. Therefore, routine screening of high-risk population would be a better approach for earlier and, ultimately, less expensive way in combating the chlamydia infection. Recent report in Croatia suggested the feasibility of routine chlamydial screenings through analysis of at-home collected urine and/or vaginal flush samples [6]. Moreover, at-home collected samples result in higher detection of chlamydial infection then samples obtained conventionally, at doctors’ offices [1, 39].
Strikingly, almost one-third of infected individuals, especially those younger than 20 years, show recurrent chlamydial genital infections [21, 41]. In addition, infections with H, I, and J serotypes are often resistant to antibiotics and persist in the genital tract even 2–3 years after the treatment [9, 21]. In the case of individuals prone to recurrent infections, routine screenings could be combined with Ct serotype determination through omp1 gene sequencing. This would help to understand whether those infections are caused by relapse, reinfection or new infection [41].
As a follow-up of the work presented here, a 2 years-long epidemiological study is necessary in order to determine the true (symptomatic and asymptomatic) prevalence of Ct infection in Croatia. Finally, we suggest a study predicting the costs of routine screenings of high-risk population and comparing them with the current treatment costs of Ct infection and its secondary consequences in Croatia.
In conclusion, this is the first study based on omp1 gene sequence analysis showing the distribution of urogenital Ct serotypes in clinical specimens of north-eastern Croatia. Relatively low Ct prevalence, mainly restricted to E, F, and K serotypes, was the highest in men under 20 years and women in early twenties. However, the true incidence of chlamydial infection in Croatian population is, most probably, much higher due to asymptomatic nature of this disease and incomplete screening coverage and underreporting in our study.
References
Andersen B, Istergaard L, Möller JK (1998) Home sampling versus conventional contact tracing for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male partners of infected women: randomized study. BMJ 316:350–351
Baće A, Perović M, Balen-Topić M, Markovinović L (2006) Respiratory tract infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis in newborns and infants. Croatian J Infect 26(3):103–107
Bandea CI, Kubota K, Brown TM, Klimarx PH, Bhullar V, Yanpaisarn S, Chaisilwattana P, Siriwasin W, Black CM (2001) Typing of Chlamydia trachomatis strains from urine samples by amplification and sequencing the major outer membrane protein gene (omp1). Sex Transm Infect 77(6):419–422
Black CM (1997) Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 10(1):160–184
Böhm I, Gröning A, Sommer B, Müller H-W, Krawczak M, Glaubitz R (2009) A German Chlamydia trachomatis screening program employing semi-automated real-time PCR: results and perspectives. J Clin Virol 46(S3):527–532
Božičević I, Grgić I, Židovec-Lepej S, Cakalo J-I, Belak-Kovačević S, Štulhofer A, Begovac J (2011) Urine-based testing Chlamydia trachomatis among young adults in a population-based survey in Croatia: feasibility and prevalence. BMC Public Health 11(230):1–24
Cabral T, Jolly AM, Wylie JL (2003) Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 genotypic diversity and concordance with sexual network data. J Infect Dis 187:279–286
Dean D, Millman K (1997) Molecular and mutation trends analyses of omp1 alleles for serovar E of Chlamydia trachomatis. Implications for the immunopathogenesis of disease. J Clin Invest 99:475–483
den Hartog JE, Morré SA, Land JA (2006) Chlamydia trachomatis-associated tubal factor subfertility: immunogenetic aspects and serological screening. Hum Reprod Update 12(6):719–730
Donati M, Di Francesco A, D’Antuono A, Pignanelli A, Shurdi A, Moroni A, Baldelli R, Cevenini R (2009) Chlamydia trachomatis serovar distribution and other concurrent sexually transmitted infections in heterosexual men with urethritis in Italy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28(5):523–526
Falk L, Fredlund H, Jensen JS (2004) Symptomatic urethritis is more prevalent in men infected with Mycoplasma genitalium than with Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Transm Infect 80(84):289–293
Filipp E, Raczyński P, El Midaoui A, Pawlowska A, Tarnowska-Madra U, Scholz A, Niemec KT, Chamerski J (2005) Chlamydia trachomatis infection in sexually active adolescent and young women. Med Wieku Rozwoj 9(1):57–64
Frost EH, Deslandes S, Bourgaux-Ramoisy D (1993) Chlamydia trachomatis serovars in 435 urogenital specimens typed by restriction endonuclease analysis of amplified DNA. J Infect Dis 168(2):497–501
Gallo-Vaulet L, Entrocassi C, Corominas AI, Rodríguez-Ferempin M (2010) Distribution study of Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes in symptomatic patients in Buenos Aires, Argentina: association between genotype E and neonatal conjunctivitis. BMC Res Notes 3:34–39
Geisler WM, Suchland RJ, Whittington WLH, Stamm WE (2003) The relationship of serovar to clinical manifestations of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex Transm Dis 30(2):160–165
Hiršl-Hećej V, Pustišek N, Šikanić-Dugić N, Domljan LM, Kani D (2006) Prevalence of chlamydial genital infection and association risk factors in adolescent females at an urban reproductive health care center in Croatia. Coll Antropol 30(2):131–137
Hsu MC, Tsai PY, Chen KT, Li LH, Chiang CC, Tsai JJ, Ke LY, Chen HY, Li SH (2006) Genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis from specimens in Taiwan. J Clin Microbiol 55(3):301–308
Ikehata M, Numazaki K, Chiba S (2000) Analyisis of Chlamydia trachomatis serovars in endocervical specimens derived from pregnant Japanese women. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 27(1):35–41
Jarža-Davila N, Marijan T (2006) The diagnosis of genital infection at Zagreb Institute of Public Health. Hrvatski časopis za javno zdravstvo 2(8) http://www.hcjz.hr/clanak.php?id=12960&rnd
Jurstrand M, Falk L, Fredlud H, Linberg M, Olcén P, Andersson S, Persson K, Albert J, Bäckman A (2001) Characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 genotypes among sexually transmitted disease patients in Sweden. J Clin Microbiol 39(11):3915–3919
Kjær HO, Dimcevski G, Hoff G, Olesen F, Østergaard L (2000) Recurrence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection evaluated by mailed samples obtained at home. 24 weeks’ prospective follow up study. Sex Transm Infect 76:169–172
Klavs I, Rodrigues LC, Wellings K, Keše D, Hayes R (2004) Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the general population of Slovenia: serious gaps in control. Sex Transm Infect 80:121–123
Klint M, Löfdahl M, Ek C, Airell Å, Berglund T, Herrmann B (2006) Lymphogranuloma venerum prevalence in Sweden among men who have sex with men and characterisation of Chlamydia trachomatis ompA genotypes. J Clin Microbiol 44(11):4066–4071
Kučinskienė V, Šutaitė I, Valiukevičienė S, Milašauskienė Ž, Domeika M (2006) Prevalence and risk factors of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Medicina (Kaunas) 42(10):885–894
Laga M, Manoka A, Kivuvu M, Malele B, Tuliza M, Nzila N, Goeman J, Behets F, Batter V, Alary M, Heyward WL, Ryder RW, Piot P (1993) Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1 transmission in women: results from a cohort study. AIDS 7(1):95–102
Levidiotou S, Vrioni G, Papadogeorgaki H, Avdeliodi K, Kada H, Kaparos G, Kouskouni E, Fragouli E, Legakis NJ (2005) Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Greece: first prevalence study using nucleic acid amplification tests. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24(3):207–213
Lister NA, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Janssen P, Garland S (2004) Variability of the Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 gene detected in samples from men tested in male-only saunas in Melbourne, Australia. J Clin Microbiol 42(6):2596–2601
Lister NA, Fairley CK, Tabrizi SN, Garland S, Smith A (2005) Chlamydia trachomatis serovars causing urogenital infections in women in Melbourne, Australia. J Clin Microbiol 43(5):2546–2547
Lysén M, Ősterlund A, Rubin CJ, Persson T, Persson I, Herrmann B (2004) Characterization of ompA genotypes by sequence analysis of DNA from all detected cases of Chlamydia trachomatis infections during 1 year of contact tracing in a Swedish county. J Clin Microbiol 42(4):1641–1647
Mahony JB, Coombes BK, Chernesky MA (2003) Chlamydia and Chlamydophila. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Pfaller M, Yolken RH (eds) Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th edn. ASM Press, Washington, pp 991–1004
Manavi K (2006) A review of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20(6):941–951
Millman K, Black CM, Johnson RE, Stamm WE, Jones RB, Hook EW, Martin DH, Bolan G, Tavaré S, Dean D (2004) Population-based genetic and evolutionary analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital strain variation in the United States. J Bacteriol 186(8):2457–2465
Molano M, Meijer CJLM, Morré SA, Pol R, van den Brule AJC (2004) Combination of PCR targeting the VD2 of omp1 and reverse line blot analysis for typing of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis serovars in cervical scrape specimens. J Clin Microbiol 42(7):2935–2939
Morré SA, Rozendaal L, van Valkengoed IGM, Boeke AJP, van Voorst Vader PC, Schirm J, de Blok S, van den Hoek JAR, van Doornum GJJ, Meijer CJLM, van den Brule AJC (2000) Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis serovars in men and women with a symptomatic or asymptomatic infection: an association with clinical manifestation? J Clin Microbiol 38(6):2292–2296
Mossman D, Beagley KW, Landay AL, Loewenthal M, Ooi C, Timms P, Boyle M (2008) Genotyping of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis in regional New South Wales, Australia. Sex Transm Dis 35(6):614–616
Numazaki K (2004) Current problems of perinatal Chlamydia trachomatis infections. J Immune Based Ther Vaccines 2(4):1–7
Nyári T, Nyári C, Woodward M, Mészáros G, Deák J, Nagy E, Kovács L (2001) Screeninig for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women in Hungary. An epidemiological and cost effectiveness analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(4):300–306
Østergaard L, Andersen B, Olesen F, Møller JK (1998) Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomize study. BMJ 317(7150):26–27
Papadogeorgakis H, Pittaras TE, Papaparaskevas J, Pitiriga V, Katsambas A, Tsakris A (2010) Chlamydia trachomatis serovar distribution and Neisseria gonorrhoeae coinfection in male patients with urethritis in Greece. J Clin Microbiol 48:2231–2234
Pedersen NL, Kjaer HO, Moller JK, Orntoft TF, Ostergaard L (2000) High-resolution genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis from recurrent urogenital infections. J Clin Microbiol 38(8):3068–3071
Peipert JF (2003) Genital chlamydial infections. N Engl J Med 349(25):2424–2430
Rodríguez R, Hernández R, Fuster F, Torres A, Prieto P, Alberto J (2001) Genital infection and infertility. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 19(6):261–266
Ronsmans C, Bulut A, Yolsal N, Agaçfidan A, Filippi V (1996) Clinical algorithms for the screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in Turkish women. Genitourin Med 72:182–186
Samoff E, Koumans EH, Markowitz LE, Sternberg M, Sawyer MK, Swan D, Papp JR, Black CM, Unger ER (2005) Association of Chlamydia trachomatis with persistence of high-risk of human papillomavirus in a cohort of female adolescents. Am J Epidemiol 162:668–675
Schmitz E, Nettelnbreker E, Zeider H, Hammer M, Manor E, Wollenhaupt J (1993) Intracellualar persistence of chlamydial major outer-membrane protein, lipopolysaccharide and ribosomal RNA after non-productive infection of human monocytes with Chlamydia trachomatis serovar K. J Med Microbiol 38:278–279
Spasovski MS, Simjanovska LJ, Taleski V, Petrova N, Lazetic L, Popeska Z, Gaydos CA, Quinn TC, Efremov GD (2005) Screeninig of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 19(4):427–430
Stothard DR, Boguslawski G, Jones RB (1998) Phylogenetic analysis of the Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein and examination of potential pathogenic determinants. Infect Immun 66(8):3618–3625
Suchland RJ, Eckert LO, Hawes SE, Stamm WE (2003) Longitudinal assessment of infecting serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis in Seattle public health clinics: 1988–1996. Sex Transm Dis 30(4):357–361
Takahashi K, Yoshida H, Hagiwara T, Sato K (1998) Serovar distribution of genital Chlamydia trachomatis in Japanese Women and its correlation with clinical symptoms. J Infect Chemother 4(1):32–35
van Valkengoed IGM, Morré SA, van den Brule AJC, Meijer CJLM, Bouter LM, Boeke AJP (2004) Overestimation of complication rates in evaluations of Chlamydia trachomatis screening programmes—implications for cost-effectiveness analyses. Int J Epidemiol 33(2):416–425
Vuylsteke B, Vandenbruaene M, Vandenbalcke P, Van Dyck E, Laga M (1999) Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence and sexual behaviour among female adolescents in Belgium. Sex Transm Infect 75(3):152–155
Watson EM, Templeton A, Russell I, Paavonen J, Mardh P-A, Stray A, Pedersen BS (2002) The accuracy and efficacy of screening tests for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review. J Med Microbiol 51:1021–1031
Wilson JS, Honey E, Templeton A, Paavonen A, Mardh PA, Stary A, Stray-Pedersen B (2002) A systematic review of the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among European women. Hum Reprod Update 8(4):385–394
Xiong L, Kong F, Zhou H, Gilbert GL (2006) Use of PCR and reverse line blot hybridization assay for rapid simultaneous detection and serovar identification of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol 44(4):1413–1418
Zdrodowska-Stefanov B, Ostaszewska-Puchalska I, Pucilo K (2003) The immunology of Chlamydia trachomatis. Arch Immunol Ther Exp 51:289–294
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all participants in our study. The authors also greatly appreciate the help received from Bojan Sarkanj B.Sc. for data analysis. We wish to express our gratitude to Drs. Marcela Covic, and Irina Abaza for their generous advice, critical input for to the development of this study and their help with article revisions. This study was supported by Institute of Public Health for the Osijek-Baranya County and by Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sport grant #309-0061194-2023 (to GL).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bošnjak, Z., Džijan, S., Pavlinić, D. et al. Distribution of Chlamydia trachomatis Serotypes in Clinical Urogenital Samples from North-Eastern Croatia. Curr Microbiol 64, 552–560 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-012-0106-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-012-0106-7