Always Contact a Vascular Interventional Specialist Before Amputating a Patient with Critical Limb Ischemia
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Met, R., Koelemay, M.J.W., Bipat, S. et al. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (2010) 33: 469. doi:10.1007/s00270-009-9687-3
- 381 Downloads
Patients with severe critical limb ischemia (CLI) due to long tibial artery occlusions are often poor candidates for surgical revascularization and frequently end up with a lower limb amputation. Subintimal angioplasty (SA) offers a minimally invasive alternative for limb salvage in this severely compromised patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of SA in patients with CLI caused by long tibial occlusions who have no surgical options for revascularization and are facing amputation. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients with CLI due to long tibial occlusions who were scheduled for amputation because they had no surgical options for revascularization and who were treated by SA. A total of 26 procedures in 25 patients (14 males; mean age, 70 ± 15 [SD] years) were evaluated. Technical success rate was 88% (23/26). There were four complications, which were treated conservatively. Finally, in 10 of 26 limbs, no amputation was needed. A major amputation was needed in 10 limbs (7 below-knee amputations and 3 above-knee amputations). Half of the major amputations took place within 3 months after the procedure. Cumulative freedom of major amputation after 12 months was 59% (SE = 11%). In six limbs, amputation was limited to a minor amputation. Seven patients (28%) died during follow-up. In conclusion, SA of the tibial arteries seem to be a valuable treatment option to prevent major amputation in patients with CLI who are facing amputation due to lack of surgical options.
KeywordsSubintimal angioplastyTibial arteriesCritical limb ischemia
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a manifestation of severe peripheral arterial disease, characterized by pain at rest, nonhealing ulcers, or both. Revascularization is necessary to save the limb and this can be performed surgically or percutaneously . When both treatments are possible, endovascular therapy is preferred because of similar clinical outcomes and lower costs .
Percutaneous angioplasty of the infrapopliteal arteries has long been regarded as a difficult procedure because of the small caliber of the tibial arteries and the tendency to develop spasm [3, 4]. Over the years experience with percutaneous treatment of infrapopliteal disease has grown, with promising technical and clinical results [5–7]. While short occlusions can be treated percutaneously, most long occlusions still require a surgical approach. Subintimal angioplasty (SA) is a percutaneous alternative to surgery to overcome long occlusions, when a transluminal approach would be technically impossible. Although SA of tibial arteries can result in high limb salvage rates, most studies do not differentiate between severe and mild ischemia and do not state whether a surgical option was still available. As a result, such mixed patient groups show higher limb salvage rates compared with patients with CLI without a surgical option for revascularization.
Patients with end-stage CLI with long and multiple tibial artery occlusions, without options for surgical revascularization, often end up with an amputation. In such patients, infrapopliteal SA could be an interesting treatment and a last chance to save the patient’s limb. This ‘percutaneous temporary pedal bypass’ was described previously .
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether tibial artery SA in end-stage CLI patients without surgical options an amputation. As a secondary objective of the study, we evaluated the influence of outflow on clinical success.
A retrospective review was performed of all consecutive patients without surgical options for revascularization who underwent a percutaneous vascular intervention of the tibial arteries between 1 August 2006 and 31 December 2008. All patients were considered candidates for amputation due to uncontrollable ischemic rest pain or nonhealing ulcers, necrosis, or gangrene. The indication for amputation was made by the vascular surgeon, in close consultation with the interventional radiologist. To confirm correct patient selection, we reviewed all patients with CLI who presented at our hospital during the study period to verify the indication once more with an expert panel consisting of a vascular surgeon (M.K.) and an interventional radiologist (J.R.). We included only patients with an absolute indication for amputation, i.e., absence of a suitable artery for distal anastomosis. All patients with a clinical presentation showing an option for healing were accepted for an attempt at endovascular revascularization. Only those patients who were having severe gangrene with deep infection, patients who were septic, and patients with severe ischemia who were not ambulatory due to other medical causes underwent primary amputation. All patients were treated for long and multiple tibial artery occlusions. Accompanying poor inflow due to stenoses in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) was not an exclusion criterion. These lesions were treated in the same procedure. Risk factors , previous interventions, preintervention vascular assessment, indication, and length of the treated lesion were recorded.
Patient characteristics at assessment (n = 25)
Mean (±SD) or n (%)
Current or former smoker
History of coronary artery disease
History of stroke
Limb characteristics at assessment (n = 26)
Median (range) or n (%)
III, rest pain
IV, nonhealing ulcer
Ankle pressure (highest; mmHg)
Toe pressure (mmHg)
Previous vascular intervention, ipsilateral
Below-knee amputation, contralateral
Length of lesions
Total reconstruction (tibial–popliteal–femoral)
Clinical follow-up was performed by the vascular surgeon. Follow-up regimens were left to the surgeon’s discretion and when clinically indicated. Final study follow-up was done by contacting the patient’s general practitioner.
The primary end point was limb salvage. Limb salvage was defined as freedom from major amputation, i.e., any amputation above the level of the ankle. Secondary end points included technical success of the procedure, defined as <30% final residual stenosis measured at the narrowest point of the vascular lumen, and clinical success, defined as recovery or stabilization of rest pain or ulcers and freedom from minor amputation, defined as any transmetatarsal amputation or amputation of one or more toes. Complications were classified as minor and major .
To explore any differences in outflow between patients with and those without a major amputation, the before and after intervention angiograms were retrospectively examined by two experienced interventional radiologists (with 6 and 23 years of experience, respectively) who were unaware of the clinical outcome of the patient. The popliteal to distal vessels were assessed according to three categories: 0, occlusion; 1, severe vessel wall irregularities and diffuse narrowing; and 2, no or minor vessel wall irregularities and a fully patent lumen. Moreover, we recorded outflow to the foot after intervention, whether there was direct flow to the dorsalis pedis artery, plantar arterial arch, and lateral plantar artery. In the case of disagreement between the two radiologists, the images in question were jointly reviewed and a consensus sought.
Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. We analyzed the entire group as well as the subgroups based on outcome after intervention (patients with a major amputation versus other patients). Patient-related outcomes, like survival and patient characteristics, are presented on a per-patient basis. Procedure-related outcomes, like limb salvage and technical success, are presented on a per-limb basis. For exploring possible differences in inflow (whether or not the SFA was treated) and outflow between patients who improved and those who were amputated, we used the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Survival and limb salvage were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Agreement between the two radiologists in assessing the angiograms is expressed as weighted kappa values. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
All patients were treated by SA for long tibial artery occlusions. In 11 limbs, a subintimal or transluminal revascularization of the SFA was also performed. The intervention was technically successful in 23 of 26 limbs (88%). Reasons for failure were calcifications that were too extensive in one patient and lack of peripheral runoff found for re-entry in two patients. Before intervention, 11 patients had all three tibial arteries occluded, 14 patients had one patent tibial artery, and 1 patient had two patent tibial arteries. After intervention, in 1 patient all three tibial arteries were still occluded, 13 patients had one patent tibial artery, and 11 patients had 2 patent tibial arteries. In 1 patient, all three tibial arteries were patent.
Complications occurred after 4 procedures. There were 4 minor complications; a dissection, a subsequent local extravasation, and a false aneurysm—all treated conservatively; and a nose bleed, which required insertion of a tampon. There was one major complication: an acute right-sided cardiac failure which required a 2-day admission to the cardiac care unit. Patients were discharged a median of 9 days (range, 0–115 days) after intervention.
The agreement of the two interventional radiologists regarding assessment of the arteries before and after treatment was substantial (weighted κ = 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–0.82). Before the procedure, the vessels of patients who underwent a major amputation were worse than those of patients who improved or who needed only a minor amputation, with more frequent severe stenosis or occlusion (nonsignificant). After the procedure, especially the anterior tibial artery and the dorsalis pedis artery were significantly of better quality in the improved patients (p = 0.059 and p = 0.005, respectively).
Concomitant treatment of SFA lesions was not associated with improved outcome. On the contrary, some 60% of patients with a major amputation had a concomitant SFA revascularization, versus 31% of patients who did not have a major amputation, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.23).
Outflow to the arteries of the foot after intervention: comparison between patients who improved after treatment (n = 16) and patients who received a major amputation (n = 10)
Direct flow to dorsalis pedis artery
Direct flow to plantar artery
Direct flow to pedal-plantar arch
Improved (n = 16)
Amputation (n = 10)
In this study, we showed that SA of long tibial occlusions in patients with severe chronic CLI without surgical options for revascularization is technically feasible and has a good clinical success rate. In one-third of patients the clinical status improved or remained unchanged. A major amputation was still needed in nearly one-third of the patients, and a minor amputation in one-fourth. The technical success of the procedure was high, and there were only a few complications, which could be treated conservatively. Based on these results, we think that a patient scheduled for amputation due to end-stage chronic CLI must always be referred to a vascular interventional specialist with experience in lower limb SA.
In the present study, outflow after intervention was associated with clinical outcome. Patients whose limb was saved after intervention more often had direct outflow to the dorsalis pedis artery. There was a trend toward a better clinical outcome in the case of direct flow to the pedal-plantar arch after intervention. These results confirm the importance of adequate outflow in both endovascular  and surgical revascularization [1, 14–16] procedures. This implies that opening of the tibial arteries is not enough; the intervention should also focus on improvement of outflow. New low-profile balloons and dedicated 0.14-in. guidewires, not used in the current study, might help to target this outflow problem. In the present study, we did not perform additional PTA of the foot arteries. However, due to very low flow before the intervention, filling of the foot arteries was nominal. After treatment, the filling increased a lot due to better inflow caused by the SA of the tibial arteries. As a result of this study, we have started using foot artery PTA or SA to establish adequate outflow.
In our study we also found that patients who had undergone concomitant revascularization of the SFA in the same session had a worse clinical outcome, possibly indicating that patients with more extensive disease benefit less from revascularization. The cohort was too small to allow for a multivariate analysis.
In the few studies reporting on SA of the infrapopliteal arteries in patients with CLI [5–7, 17, 18], the technical success rate was high, ranging from 78 to 86%, and comparable to our technical success rate (88%). Our complication rate of 15% (4/26) was also in line with these studies. One-year limb salvage in our study was 59%, versus a reported 1-year limb salvage rate ranging from 81 to 94%. This difference probably reflects patient selection. We included only patients with CLI without options for surgical revascularization requiring amputation. It is known from a previous study, which included patients who were both suitable and unsuitable for a surgical bypass, that unsuitability for surgery was associated with restenosis, reintervention, or amputation .
SA of the tibial arteries must be considered among other alternative therapies for end-stage CLI patients, such as spinal cord stimulation , treatment with Iloprost [21–23], and therapeutic angiogenesis with progenitor cells [24–26].
Some shortcomings of this study should be mentioned. The retrospective nature of our study results in different sources of bias. First, selection bias potentially influenced our results; we only studied a selected sample of a larger group of patients with CLI. Second, retrospective data collection often leads to incomplete data. For example, in our study, pressure measurements were missing for 10 patients. Therefore, our results cannot be supported by objective pressure measurements. Also, follow-up was not performed according to a standard protocol, although we tried to perform follow-up as completely as possible by contacting treating physicians or local general practitioners. The lack of a control series is another limitation of this study and reduces the evidence for definite conclusions.
Currently, there are no guidelines for anticoagulant therapy after interventions of the tibial arteries. There is wide consensus that all patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease should be treated with anticoagulant therapy . In our study, anticoagulant therapy after the procedure was not prescribed according to a standard protocol. All patients were treated at least with aspirin or a vitamin K antagonist. After the procedure, the interventionalist judged the speed of flow, and when it was assessed to be slow, clopidogrel, 75 mg daily for 3 months, was prescribed. Again, due to the small size of the cohort, we were not able to analyze the influence of anticoagulant regimen on outcome.
There were no stents placed in the tibial arteries because there is no evidence of benefit of stent placement in comparison with revascularization only.
In conclusion, subintimal angioplasty of the tibial arteries seems to be a valuable treatment option to prevent major amputation in patients with severe CLI without any surgical bypass options, facing amputation. Taking into account the short life expectation of this population, subintimal angioplasty must be considered as the last chance to save the patient’s limb. Crucial for the outcome of this kind of last-resort procedure is establishing good outflow for the recanalized vessels.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.