Comparative Experience of Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagogastric Resection
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
A minimally invasive approach to esophagogastric cancer resection offers an attractive alternative to traditional open surgery; however, concerns regarding feasibility, safety, cost, and outcomes have restricted widespread acceptance of these procedures. This study outlines our comparative experiences of both open and minimally invasive esophagectomy over a 4-year period.
Surgical outcomes were analyzed and compared between 30 consecutive patients who underwent open (Ivor Lewis) transthoracic esophagectomy (TTO) between January 2002 and December 2003 and 50 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) from January 2004 to July 2006.
Inpatient mortality and overall surgical morbidity were identical for each cohort (TTO versus MIO: mortality 3% versus 2%; morbidity 50% versus 48%). Pulmonary-related complications were higher in the open series (23% versus 8%; p = 0.05). The incidence of gastric-conduit-related complications was similar between the two cohorts (13% versus 18%; p = 0.52). Survival at 1 and 2 years was 86% and 58% in the TTO group and 94% and 74% in the MIO group. No significant difference in calculated cost was observed (£7,017 versus £7,885).
Transition from open to minimally invasive techniques of esophagogastric resection for cancer is possible without compromising patient safety or incurring excessive financial expenses, and the minimally invasive procedure results in similar or potentially better outcomes.
- Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494
- Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I et al (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245:232–240 CrossRef
- Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R et al (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16 CrossRef
- Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Sanders D et al (2008) Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 95:602–610 CrossRef
- Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C et al (1991) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:138–143
- Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group (2002) Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemothearpy in oesophageal cancer. Lancet 359:1727–1733 CrossRef
- Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L et al (1998) Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg 65:814–817 CrossRef
- Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG et al (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347:1662–1669 CrossRef
- Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al (2003) Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. EcoHealth 17:515–519
- Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM (2002) Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg 194:285–297 CrossRef
- Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM et al (2000) Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 135:920–925 CrossRef
- Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J et al (2000) A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 88:1781–1787 CrossRef
- Zieren HU, Jacobi CA, Zieren J et al (1996) Quality of life following resection of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 83:1772–1775 CrossRef
- Comparative Experience of Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagogastric Resection
World Journal of Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 9 , pp 1868-1875
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK