Necrotic Complications after Nipple- and Areola-Sparing Mastectomy
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The objective was to analyze the frequency and factors influencing necrotic complication in female patients undergoing nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy.
Summary and background data
Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy has recently been shown to yield satisfactory results in a carefully selected group of breast cancer patients. The technique includes extensive undermining of the nipple–areola complex, which may result in an increased rate of necrotic complications. We report our early experience with necrotic changes after nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy.
The medical records of 38 patients undergoing nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy were analyzed retrospectively.
Mean age of the patient was 44.5 years (range 26–65). Necrotic complications occurred in 15.8% of patients and included: skin flap necrosis (1 case), partial nipple–areola complex necrosis (2 cases), and complete nipple–areola complex necrosis (3 cases). Two cases of capsular contraction were also recorded. Statistical analysis showed age below 45 years to be associated with a lower risk of necrotic complications (OR 4.51, P < 0.05).
The nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy, although resulting in a relatively high frequency of necrotic complications, is a valuable surgical option for patients with small, peripheral tumors and for women undergoing prophylactic mastectomy. The procedure seems to be safer for women under 45 years of age.
- Gerber, B, Krause, A, Reimer, T (2003) Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg 238: pp. 120-127 CrossRef
- Mustonen, P, Lepisto, J, Paap, A (2004) The surgical and oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 30: pp. 817-823
- Simmons, RM, Hollenbeck, ST, LaTrenta, GS (2004) Two-year follow-up of areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Am J Surg 188: pp. 403-406 CrossRef
- Simmons, RM, Brennan, M, Christos, P (2002) Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved?. Ann Surg Oncol 9: pp. 165-168 CrossRef
- Cense, HA, Rutgers, EJTh, Lopes Cardozo, M (2001) Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option?. Eur J Surg Oncol 27: pp. 521-526 CrossRef
- Mortenson, MM, Schneider, PD, Khatri, VP (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy increases wound complications. Arch Surg 139: pp. 988-991 CrossRef
- Crowe, JP, Kim, JA, Yetman, R (2004) Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg 139: pp. 148-150 CrossRef
- Petit, JY, Veronesi, U, Orecchia, R (2003) The nipple sparing mastectomy: early results of a feasibility study of a new application of perioperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in the treatment of breast cancer when mastectomy is indicated. Tumori 89: pp. 288-291
- Necrotic Complications after Nipple- and Areola-Sparing Mastectomy
World Journal of Surgery
Volume 30, Issue 8 , pp 1410-1413
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute of Oncology, Cancer Centre, Krakow, Poland
- 4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute of Oncology, Cancer Centre, ul. Garncarska 11, 31-115, Krakow, Poland
- 2. Department of Breast and Reconstructive Surgery, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
- 3. Department of Applied Health Sciences, Pavia University, Pavia, Italy