Skip to main content
Log in

Sharpless Surgery: A Prospective Study of the Feasibility of Performing Operations using Non-sharp Techniques in an Urban, University-based Surgical Practice

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Percutaneous injuries occur frequently during surgical procedures and represent a significant occupational hazard to operating room personnel.

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility of performing select general surgical procedures using a combination of non-sharp devices and techniques to replace the conventional use of scalpels and needles.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Candidate procedures for which sharpless techniques could replace conventional scalpels and suture needles were identified preoperatively in an urban, university-based general surgical practice over a 1-year period (June 2003–June 2004). Non-sharp techniques included monomeric 2-octyl cyanoacrylate adhesive, electrocautery, tissue stapler, and minimally invasive instrumentation. Conventional scalpels and suture needles were readily available and used whenever necessary.

Main Outcome Measures

We rated the feasibility of performing specific procedures without sharps. We also documented the rate of overall reversion to sharps during operations on patients that had been identified preoperatively as candidates for sharpless surgery.

Results

Of 358 procedures performed in the general surgery university practice, 91 were identified preoperatively as appropriate for sharpless surgery. Of these, 86.8% (79/91) were completed without the use of sharps, including 13/22 (59.1%) open laparotomy procedures, 20/22 (90.9%) laparoscopic procedures, and 46/47 (97.8%) soft tissue procedures. Intraoperative reversion to sharps occurred in 12 cases when deemed necessary by the surgeon.

Conclusions

Select common procedures can be performed entirely with sharpless techniques, eliminating the risk to surgical personnel associated with intraoperative percutaneous injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerberding JL, Littell C, Tarkington A, et al. Risk of exposure of surgical personnel to patients’ blood during surgery at San Francisco General Hospital. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1788–1793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cobelens F. Needlestick injuries, surgeons, and HIV risks. Lancet 1990;335:924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tokars JI, Bell DM, Culver DH, et al. Percutaneous injuries during surgical procedures. J Am Med Assoc 1992;267:2899–2904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Quebbeman EJ, Telford GL, Hubbard S, et al. Risk of blood contamination and injury to operating room personnel. Ann Surg 1991;214:614–620

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leentvaar-Kuijpers A, Dekker MM, Coutinho RA, et al. Needlestick injuries, surgeons, and HIV risks. Lancet 1990;335:546–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jagger J, Bentley M, Tereskerz P. A study of patterns and prevention of blood exposures in OR personnel. AORN J 1998;67:979–981, 983–984, 986–987 passim

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Panlilio AL, Foy DR, Edwards JR, et al. Blood contacts during surgical procedures. J Am Med Assoc 1991;265:1533–1537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerberding JL. Clinical practice. occupational exposure to HIV in health care settings. N Engl J Med 2003;348:826–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss ES, Makary MA, Wang T, et al. Prevalence of blood-borne pathogens in an urban, university-based general surgical practice. Ann Surg 2005;241:803–807; discussion 807–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alter MJ, Kruszon-Moran D, Nainan OV, et al. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1988 through 1994. N Engl J Med 1999;341:556–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Viral hepatitis C fact sheet. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/c/fact.htm. Accessed July 15, 2005

  12. Martinson FE, Weigle KA, Mushahwar IK, et al. Seroepidemiological survey of hepatitis B and C virus infections in Ghanaian children. J Med Virol 1996;48:278–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sagoe-Moses C, Pearson RD, Perry J, et al. Risks to health care workers in developing countries. N Engl J Med 2001;345:538–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 2004 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. Geneva: Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS; 2004

  15. Steinbrook R. The AIDS epidemic in 2004. N Engl J Med 2004;351:115–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS UNAIDS. AIDS epidemic update: December 1999. AIDS Anal Afr 2000;10:2

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:41–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Benedetti-Panici PL, et al. A multicentre collaborative study on the use of cold scalpel and electrocautery for midline abdominal incision. Am J Surg 2001;181:128–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Quinn J, Wells G, Sutcliffe T, et al. A randomized trial comparing octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and sutures in the management of lacerations. J Am Med Assoc 1997;277:1527–1530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gennari R, Rotmensz N, Ballardini B, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) versus standard wound closure in breast surgery. Surgery 2004;136:593–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Singer AJ, Quinn JV, Clark RE, and the TraumaSeal Study Group, et al. Closure of lacerations and incisions with octylcyanoacrylate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surgery 2002;131:270–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. String A, Berber E, Foroutani A, et al. Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 2001;15:570–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McKernan JB, Finley CR. Experience with optical trocar in performing laparoscopic procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:96–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barker DE, Kaufman HJ, Smith LA, et al. Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a 7-year experience with 112 patients. J Trauma 2000;48:201–206; discussion 206–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Garner GB, Ware DN, Cocanour CS, et al. Vacuum-assisted wound closure provides early fascial reapproximation in trauma patients with open abdomens. Am J Surg 2001;182:630–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jagger J, Balon M. Suture needle and scalpel blade injuries: frequent but underreported. Infect Control Steril Technol 1996;2:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  27. Short L, Chamberland M, Culver D, et al. Underreporting of needlestick injuries (NSIs) among health care workers (HCWs). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15

  28. Bennett NT, Howard RJ. Quantity of blood inoculated in a needlestick injury from suture needles. J Am Coll Surg 1994;178:107–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tokars JI, Chamberland ME, Schable CA, et al. A survey of occupational blood contact and HIV infection among orthopedic surgeons. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Serosurvey Study Committee. J Am Med Assoc 1992;268:489–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lowenfels AB, Wormser GP, Jain R. Frequency of puncture injuries in surgeons and estimated risk of HIV infection. Arch Surg 1989;124:1284–1286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jagger J, Bentley M, Juillet E. Direct cost of follow-up for percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposures to at-risk body fluids: data from two hospitals. Adv Exposure Prevent 1998;3:54–56

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guimet M, Mendicino S, Rockett MS. Percutaneous injuries in a high-volume podiatric surgical residency program. J Foot Ankle Surg 2001;40:15–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin A. Makary MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makary, M.A., Pronovost, P.J., Weiss, E.S. et al. Sharpless Surgery: A Prospective Study of the Feasibility of Performing Operations using Non-sharp Techniques in an Urban, University-based Surgical Practice. World J. Surg. 30, 1224–1229 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0605-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0605-9

Keywords

Navigation