Effects of Changing Forest and Impervious Land Covers on Discharge Characteristics of Watersheds
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Effects of changing patterns of forest and impervious land covers on hydrologic regimes of watersheds were evaluated for urban and rural areas of the lower Cedar River drainage near Seattle, Washington. Land cover characterizations were used in a spatially explicit hydrology model to assess effects of land covers on watershed hydrology during presettlement conditions (“full forest cover”), 1991 and 1998. For the presettlement to 1991 period, urban watersheds showed decreases in forest covers (range 63% to 83%) and increases in impervious surfaces (range 43% to 71%). Rural watersheds showed similar patterns but smaller changes, with forest covers decreasing (range 28% to 34%) and impervious surfaces increasing (range 8% to 15%). For the 1991 and 1998 period, changes in forest covers for urban and rural watershed were <24%, with losses in some watersheds and regeneration in others. Impervious surfaces continued to increase, but increases were larger in rural (range 38% to 60%) than in urban watersheds (range 4% to 27%). Flood-frequency curves indicated that discharge rates (m sec−1) for all watersheds were higher in 1991 and 1998 than historical and suggested that chances for floods increase because of changing land covers. The largest increases in discharge rates were in urban watersheds, with rates for 2-year, 10-year, and 25-year recurrence intervals being more than two times greater than the rate during historical conditions. Changes in flow regimes were indicated by presettlement discharge levels of less frequent recurrence intervals (10-year and 25-year) occurring in posturbanization times (1991 and 1998) during more frequent intervals (2-year and 10-year). Normalized flows (m yr−1) of watersheds for 2-year, 10-year, and 25-year recurrence intervals indicate how flow regimes in 1991 and 1998 can change as functions of different areas of land covers. During 1991 and 1998, abrupt increases in flows occurred when forest covers were low (range 17% to 37%) and impervious surfaces were >46%. In contrast, the lowest flows occurred when forest covers were most extensive (range 59% to 81%) and impervious surfaces were <23%. We conclude that our use of spatial characterizations of impervious surfaces and forested covers in a spatially explicit hydrology model provides a robust approach for revealing how variations in different types and spatial distributions of land covers can affect flood regimes and flows of different watersheds.
- Arnold, C. L., Gibbons, C. J. (1996) Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association 2: pp. 243-258
- Beard, L. R. (1962) Statistical methods in hydrology. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento, California
- Bicknell, B. R., J. C. Imhoff, J. L. Little, A. S. Donigian, and R. C. Johanson. 1997. Hydrological Simulation Program—Fortran, user manual for release 10. Thend, Georgia, U. S. Environmental Protection agency-600/R-93/144, Environmental Research Laboratory, 660 pp.
- Booth, D. B. (1991) Urbanization and the natural drainage system—Impacts, solution, and prognosis. The Northwest Environmental Journal 7: pp. 93-118
- Booth, D. B., Haugerud, R. A., Troost, K. G. The geology of Puget Sound rivers. Pages 14–45. In: Montgomery, D. R., Bolton, S., Booth, D. B., Wall, J. eds. (2003) Restoration of Puget Sound rivers. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington
- Burgan, R. E., and R. A. Hartford, 1993. Monitoring vegetation greenness with satellite data. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-297. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.
- Collins, B. D., Montgomery, D. R., Sheikh, A. J. Reconstructing the historical landscape of the Puget lowland. Pages 79–128. In: Montgomery, D. R., Bolton, S., Booth, D. B., Wall, L. eds. (2003) Restoration of Puget Sound rivers. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington
- Dingman, S. L. (1994) Physical hydrology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
- Dunne, T., Leopold, L. B. (1978) Water in environmental planning. W. B. Freeman and Co, New York
- King County 1993. Cedar River current and future conditions report. King County, Dept. Public Works, Surf. Water Manage. Div., Seattle, Washington, 1–1 to 8–12.
- King County 1998. Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan. King County Department of Natural Resources, Seattle, Washington, p. 352.
- Konrad, C. P. Opportunities and constraints for urban stream rehabilitation. Pages 292–317. In: Montgomery, D. R., Bolton, S., Booth, D. B., Wall, L. eds. (2003) Restoration of Puget Sound rivers. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington
- May, C. W., Horner, R. R. The cumulative impacts of watershed urbanization on stream-riparian ecosystems. Pages 281–286. In: Wigington, P. J., Beschta, R. L. eds. (2000) Proceedings of the International Conference on Riparian Ecology and Management in Multi-Land Use Watersheds. American Water Resources Association, Middleburg, Virginia
- Moscrip, A. L., Montgomery, D. R. (1997) Urbanization, flood frequency and salmon abundance in Puget Sound streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33: pp. 1289-1297
- Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology and public policy. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
- New strategies for Americas watersheds. National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
- Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Wasserman, W. (1996) Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill, Chicago
- Richards, A. J. (1993) Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction. Second edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
- Timm, R. K., R. C. Wissmar, J. W. Small, T. M. Leschine, and G. Lucchetti (in press). A screening procedure for prioritizing riparian management areas. Environmental Management.
- Wigmosta, M., Vail, L., Lettenmaier, D. P. (1994) A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain. Water Resources Research 30: pp. 1665-1679 CrossRef
- Williams, J. R., H. E. Pearson, and J. D. Wilson. 1985. Stream flow statistics and drainage-basin characteristics for the Puget Sound region, Washington. Volume II. Open-File Report 84-144-B, U.S. Geological Survey, pp 662
- Wissmar, R. C., Beschta, R. L. (1998) Restoration and the management of riparian ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 40: pp. 571-585 CrossRef
- Wissmar, R. C., Pflugh, D. C., Timm, R. K. Changes in developed land cover (1991–1998): Cedar River, Washington. Pages 287–292. In: Wigington, P. J., Beschta, R. L. eds. (2000) Proceedings of the International Conference on Riparian Ecology and Management in Multi-Land Use Watersheds. American Water Resources Association, Middleburg, Virginia
- Wissmar, R. C., Bisson, P. A.(eds.). (2003) Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and management systems. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland
- Wissmar, R. C., and R. K. Timm. 2003. Changes in land uses, hydrology and fish habitats in an urban drainage, Cedar River, Washington. Pages 709–714 in Proceedings of the First Interagency Conference in Watersheds, 27–30 October 2003, Bensen, Arizona.
- Zarriello, P. J. 1999. A precipitation-runoff model for part of the Ninemile Creek watershed near Camillus, Onondaga County, New York. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigation Report 98-4201, Denver, CO, 52 p.
- Effects of Changing Forest and Impervious Land Covers on Discharge Characteristics of Watersheds
Volume 34, Issue 1 , pp 91-98
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Forest covers
- Impervious surfaces
- Discharge frequency
- Normalized flow
- Flow regimes
- Spatial analyses
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Fishery Sciences Building, Box 355020, Seattle, Washington 98195-5020, USA
- 2. School of Oceanography Box 355351, University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195-5020, USA