Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Economic Analyses of Sequestering Carbon in Loblolly Pine, Cherrybark Oak, and Northern Red Oak in the United States

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global concern over increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in the atmosphere leading to possible future climate changes have generated interest in offsetting CO2 emissions by storing carbon in forests. Carbon-sequestering forest activities may be one of the least expensive approaches to mitigate the build up of atmospheric CO2. However, the fact that forest management practices are species-, site-and management-objective-specific increases the complexity of using the forestry sector to mitigate global warming. In order to provide useful and timely information concerning carbon sequestration, this study investigated three forestry-based opportunities for sequestering carbon in the United States: conversion of marginal agricultural land to forests and reforestation of poorly stocked pine plantations in the South, afforestation of the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley (LMAV), and reclamation and afforestation of abandoned mined lands (AML). This study conducted economic analyses on three region–species combinations: loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in the southern states, cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda Raf.) in the LMAV, and northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) on AML in West Virginia. The objectives of this study were to determine the profitability of managing these three commercial tree species for timber production only and for the combination of timber production and carbon sequestration and then calculate net tonnes of carbon stored during one rotation and net revenues generated from each tonne of carbon sequestered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. M. Adams R. J. Alig B. M. McCarl J. M. Callaway S. M. Winnett (1999) ArticleTitleMinimum cost strategies for sequestering carbon in forests. Land Economics 75 IssueID3 360–374

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, D. M., and R. W. Haynes. 1996. The 1993 timber assessment market model: structure, projections and policy simulations. General Technical Report PNW- GTR-368. USDA Forest Service, 59 pp.

  3. R. Alig D. Adams B. McCarl J. M. Callaway S. Winnett (1997) ArticleTitleAssessing effects of mitigation strategies for global climate change with an intertemporal model of the US forest and agriculture sectors. Environmental and Resource Economics 9 259–274 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026409105660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Alig J. Vasievich K. Lee (1992) Economic opportunities to increase timber growth on timberland. A. Qureshi (Eds) Forests in a changing climate. Climate Institute Washington, DC Pages 115–125

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. C. Baldwin (1987) ArticleTitleGreen and dry-weight equations for above-ground components of planted loblolly pine trees in the west gulf region. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 11 IssueID4 212–218

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bates, R. 2002. An economic analysis of sequestering carbon in forests grown on abandoned mine lands in West Virginia. Master’s thesis. Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, TX, 120 pp.

  7. R. A. Birdsey (1996) Carbon storage for major forest types and regions in the conterminous United States. in Forest and global change, vol 2. American Forests Washington, DC 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burkhart, H. E., K. D. Farrar, R. L. Amateis, and R. F. Daniels. 1987. Simulation of individual tree growth and stand development in loblolly pine plantations on cutover, site-prepared areas. FWS-1-87. School of Forestry and Wildlife Resources, VPI & SU, Blacksburg, Virginia, 47 pp

  9. R. M. Burns B. H. Honkala (1990a) Silvics of North America, vol I: conifers. USDA Forest Service . 675

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. M. Burns B. H. Honkala (1990b) Silvics of North America, vol II: hardwoods. USDA Forest Service . 877

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burtraw, D., and M. Toman. 1997. The benefits of reduced air pollutants in the U.S. from greenhouse gas mitigation policies. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 27 pp

  12. Clark, A., D. R. Phillips, and D. J. Frederick. 1986. Weight, volume, and physical properties of major hardwood species in the upland-south. Research Paper SE-RP-257. USDA Forest Service

  13. Clark, A., III, and J. G. Schroeder. 1986. Weight, volume, and physical properties of major hardwood species in the southern Appalachian mountains. Research Paper SE-RP-253. USDA Forest Service, 63 pp

  14. Council of Economic Advisors. 1998. Economic report of the President. US Government Printing Office Washington, DC, 408 pp

  15. Council of Economic Advisors. 2001. Economic report of the President. US Government Printing Office Washington, DC, 402 pp

  16. R. C. Dewar M. G. R. Cannell (1992) ArticleTitleCarbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples. Tree Physiology 11 49–71 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK38XlslShsL4%3D Occurrence Handle14969967

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. R. K. Dixon S. Brown R. A. Houghton A. M. Solomon M. C. Trexler J. Wisniewski (1994) ArticleTitleCarbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263 185–190 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXhs12gsbc%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 2001. State of the world’s forests 2001. FAO, Rome, 181 pp

  19. Huang, C. 1999. Economic analysis of carbon storage in Loblolly pine plantations. PhD dissertation. Stephen F. austin State University, Nacogdoches, TX, 93 pp.

  20. C. Huang G. D.1 Kronrad (2001) ArticleTitleThe cost of sequestering carbon on private forest lands. Forest Policy and Economics 2 133–142 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00046-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Huang G. D. Kronrad (2002) ArticleTitleFinancially optimal thinning and final harvest schedules for loblolly pine plantations on nonindustrial private forestland in East Texas. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 26 IssueID1 13–17 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhtVenurc%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kanowski, P.J. (1997) Afforestation and plantation forestry. In Proceedings of the XI World Forestry Congress, 13–22 October 1997. Antalya, Turkey. http://coombs.anu.edu.au/Depts/PSPAS/RMAP/kanow.htm

  23. R. S. Kinerson C. W. Ralston C. G. Wells (1977) ArticleTitleCarbon cycling in a loblolly pine plantation. Oecologia 29 IssueID1 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. L. King B. D. Keeland (1999) ArticleTitleEvaluation of reforestation in the Lower Mississippi River Alluvial Valley. Restoration Ecology 7 348–359 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72029.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koch, P. 1989. Estimates by species group and region in the USA of: I. Below-ground root weight as a percentage of ovendry complete-tree weight; and II. Carbon content of tree portions. Unpublished consulting report, 23 pp.

  26. Kronrad, G.D. 2002. The 2002 survey of stumpage prices of cherrybark oak in the lower Mississippi river Valley. Unpublished research documents.

  27. MacDonald, P. O., W. E. Frayer, and J. K. Clauser. 1979. Documentation, chronology, and future projections of bottomland hardwood habitat looses in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Plain, vol 1 and 2. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 34 pp

  28. Moulton, R. J., and K. R. Richards. 1990. Costs of sequestering carbon through tree planting and forest management in the United States. General Technical Report GTR-WO-58. USDA Forest Service, 47 pp

  29. Parks, P. J. 1992. Potential for Converting Marginal Crop and Pasture lands to forests. In Proceedings, North American Conference on Forestry Responses to Climate Change. USDA Forest Service

  30. A. J. Plantinga T. Mauldin D. J. Miller (1999) ArticleTitleAn econometric analysis of the cost of sequestering carbon in forests. American Agricultural Economics Association 81 812–824

    Google Scholar 

  31. InstitutionalAuthorNameReuters (2002) ArticleTitleGlobal carbon credit market seen tripling this year. http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/4317813.htm (18 October 2002) . . .

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. A. Sedjo B. Sohngen P. Jagger (2001) Carbon sinks in the post-Kyoto world. M. A. Toman (Eds) Climate change economic and policy. Resources for the Future Washington, D. C. Pages 134–142

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. W. Smith (1995) The southern Appalachian hardwood region. J. W. Barrett (Eds) Regional silviculture of the United States, 3. ed. John Wiley & Sons New York Pages 173–225

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. R. Stage D. L. Renner (1988) Comparison of yield-forecasting techniques using long-term stand histories. A. R. Ek S. R. Shifley T. E. Burk (Eds) Forest growth modeling and prediction Proceedings of the IUFRO conference, volume 2, 23–27 August 1987. General Technical Report NC-GTR-120. USDA Forest Service Minneapolis, Minnesota 1149 pp

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. A. Stanturf E. S. Gardiner (2000) ArticleTitleRestoration of bottomland hardwoods in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. In Sustaining forests: the science of forest assessment. Southern Forest Resource Assessment. http://www.srs.fs.fed.us/sustain/conf/ . . .

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. A. Stanturf S. H. Schoenholtz C. J. Schweitzer J. P. Shepard (2001) ArticleTitleAchieving restoration success: Myths in bottomland hardwood forests. Restoration Ecology 9 IssueID2 189–200 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002189.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. A. Stanturf C. J. Schweitzer E. S. Gardiner (1998) ArticleTitleAfforestation of marginal agricultural land in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, U.S.A. Silva Fennica 32 IssueID3 281–297

    Google Scholar 

  38. H. S. Sternitzke (1976) ArticleTitleImpact of changing land use on Delta hardwood forests in Journal of Forestry 74 25–27

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. Teck M Moeur B. Eav (1996) ArticleTitleForecasting ecosystems with the forest vegetation simulator. Journal of Forestry 94 IssueID12 7–10

    Google Scholar 

  40. Texas Forest Service. 1984–1998. Texas timber price trends bi-monthly market report

  41. Trexler, M. C. 1991. Minding the carbon store: Weighing U.S. forestry strategies to slow global warming. World Resources Institute, 81 pp

  42. USDA-FS (USDA Forest Service). 1982. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States: 1952–2030. Forest Resource Report No. 23

  43. USDA-FS (USDA Forest Service). 1988. The South’s fourth forest: Alternatives for the future. Forest Resources Report No. 24. 512pp

  44. USDA-FS (USDA Forest Service). 1990. America the Beautiful: National Tree Planting Initiative

  45. USDA-FS (USDA Forest Service). 1990–1997. Forest inventory and analysis database retrieval system. http://www.srsfia.usfs.msstate.edu/scripts/ew.htm (15 March 2000)

  46. USDA-FS (USDA Forest Service). 2001. U.S. forest facts and historical trends. FS-696-M. U.S.D.A. Forest Service. 21 pp

  47. USDI-OSM (US Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining) (2001) Abandoned mined land inventory system. http://www.osmre.gov/aml/inven/zamlis.htm, 94 (15 April 2001)

  48. USDI-OSM (US Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining) 2002. AML inventory definitions. http://www.osmre.gov/aml/inven/zqadefin.htm (15 Jan. 2002)

  49. G. C. van Kooten B. Stennes E. Kremar-Nozic R. van Gorkom (2000) ArticleTitleEconomics of afforestation for carbon sequestration in western Canada. The Forestry Chronicle 76 IssueID1 165–172

    Google Scholar 

  50. West Virginia Division of Forestry. 1997–2001. West Virginia timber price report

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arthur Temple College of Forestry, Stephen F. Austin State University, East College at Raguet St., BOX 6109, SFA Station, Nacogdoches, Texas 75962-6109, USA

    Ching-Hsun Huang, Richard Bates, Gary D. Kronrad & Shiaolin Cheng

Authors
  1. Ching-Hsun Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Bates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gary D. Kronrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shiaolin Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, CH., Bates, R., Kronrad, G. et al. Economic Analyses of Sequestering Carbon in Loblolly Pine, Cherrybark Oak, and Northern Red Oak in the United States. Environmental Management 33 (Suppl 1), S187–S199 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-9129-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-9129-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation