Familial Severe Gigantomastia and Reduction with the Free Nipple Graft Vertical Mammoplasty Technique: Report of Two Cases
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Misirlioglu, A. & Akoz, T. Aesth Plast Surg (2005) 29: 205. doi:10.1007/s00266-004-0134-1
- 226 Views
Gigantomastia, characterized by massive breast enlargement during adolescence or pregnancy, is thought to be caused by an abnormal and excessive end organ response to a normal hormonal milieu. The amputation technique with the free nipple–areola graft is the mainstay for severe macromastia, but it has been criticized because it results in a flattened, nonaesthetic breast with poor projection. This report presents two sisters with unusual, excessive breast enlargement.
The measured distance from the sternal notch to the nipple was 50 cm for the first case and 55 cm for the second case. The free nipple graft transplantation based on the vertical mammoplasty technique was used, and an average of 4,200 g of breast tissue per breast was removed. To increase breast projection, superior dermoglandular flaps were used
The follow-up period was 24 months. The patients had long-lasting, pronounced breast mound projection, and the level of satisfaction for both cases was very high.
The ideal geometric structure of the breast is rather conical, and the authors believe that reshaping the breast tissue in a vertical plane using the vertical mammoplasty technique may be more effective in the long term and may provide better projection.
KeywordsFree NippleGigantomastiaReduction mammoplastyVertical mammoplasty
Developmental anomalies of the breast are frequently observed in women. The term of “gigantomastia” is used to describe breast enlargement to an extreme size. The etiology of gigantomastia appears to be multifactorial, often accompanied by a familial component. The main causes of this type of breast hypertrophy may be hormone disorders, hyperthyroidism, hormonal activity, and hypersensitivity of breast estrogen and progesterone receptors . It should be emphasized that women with gigantomastia often are limited in their physical activities. Complaints may include severe neck strain, headache, aching shoulders, low back pain, deep brassiere strap furrows, and thoracic spine discomfort . Postural problems are also reported [7,9].
Women with gigantomastia breasts have severely distorted anatomic structures and multiple techniques for reduction of the giant breast are widely used. The amputation technique with the free nipple–areola graft, the mainstay for severe macromastia since 1922 , has been criticized because it results in a flattened, nonaesthetic breast with poor projection [4,16]. The standard techniques originally described for free nipple graft mammoplasty have since undergone certain modifications [2,3,5,6,1115].
In this article, we present two siblings (sisters) with unusual gigantomastia. We successfully used a method of breast reduction combined with vertical mammoplasty and free nipple graft transplantation to obtain good results.
Materials and Methods
Mammographic analysis was obtained 12 months postoperatively, and nonspecific postreduction changes included thickening of the skin at the suture lines, increased density, and benign intraparenchyma calcifications [1,12–14].
Gigantomastia, characterized by breast enlargement during adolescence or pregnancy, is thought to be caused by an abnormal and excessive ends-organ response at normal hormonal levels .
In this condition, the breasts grow rapidly to enormous size without spontaneous regression . The sizes of the breasts presented in the current study were amazingly large, but radiologic and hormonal study results were normal. Breast enlargement began during the adolescence stage in each case and increased during pregnancy. It is interesting to note the presence of similar macromastia in all the female members of the family. Perhaps congenital excessive end-organ response also is present in this family.
The large breasts in this study may have been suitable for amputation free nipple breast reduction techniques because of the increased sternal notch–nipple distance. The standard free-nipple amputation technique  frequently is criticized for producing a breast and nipple with poor projection, and several modifications have been described [2,3]. In this study, the free nipple method based on a vertical reduction technique was used in the both cases.
The vertical mammoplasty technique described by Lejour  has miscellaneous advantages such as elimination of the transverse incision and provision of a long-lasting attractive breast shape without flattening. As with the cases presented in this study, it is nearly impossible to avoid transverse incisions in such enlarged breasts. Our objective using the principles of the technique described in the current study was to reshape and reposition the breast tissue by using a vertical technique, and to obtain a better projection and breast type. Using this technique, we first excised the glandular tissue in a vertical plane, then projected and reshaped the breasts convenient to the inframammary line while strictly preserving the required vertical length (7 cm) of the breasts and excising the inferior tissues in the horizontal plane.
With our method, a superior dermoglandular flap was used to provide adequate upper fullness. The length of the flap can be modified and then the upper pole fullness or the projection of the breast can be adjusted as required. The technique is simple, rapid, and secure, and can be performed in an advantageous “cut-as-you-go” manner.
The ideal geometric structure of the breast is rather conical, and we believe that reshaping of the breast tissue in a vertical plane may be more effective in the long term and may provide better projection. Cases in which the described technique was used have given permanent and more pleasant results over the long term, but there is an urgent need for larger scale studies to obtain a definite judgment.