Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 105–114

Vicarious sampling: the use of personal and public information by starlings foraging in a simple patchy environment

  • J. J. Templeton
  • Luc-Alain Giraldeau

DOI: 10.1007/s002650050223

Cite this article as:
Templeton, J. & Giraldeau, LA. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (1996) 38: 105. doi:10.1007/s002650050223

Abstract

Group foragers may be able to assess patch quality more efficiently by paying attention to the sampling activities of conspecifics foraging in the same patch. In a previous field experiment, we showed that starlings foraging on patches of hidden food could use the successful foraging activities of others to help them assess patch quality. In order to determine whether a starling could also use another individual’s lack of foraging success to assess and depart from empty patches more quickly, we carried out two experimental studies which compared the behaviour of captive starlings sampling artificial patches both when alone and when in pairs. Solitary starlings were first trained to assess patch quality in our experimental two-patch system, and were then tested on an empty patch both alone and with two types of partner bird. One partner sampled very few holes and thus provided a low amount of public information; the other sampled numerous holes and thus provided a high amount of public information. In experiment 1, we found no evidence of vicarious sampling. Subjects sampled a similar number of empty holes when alone as when with the low and high information partners; thus they continued to rely on their own personal information to make their patch departure decisions. In experiment 2, we modified the experimental patches, increasing the ease with which a bird could watch another’s sampling activities, and increasing the difficulty of acquiring accurate personal sampling information. This time, subjects apparently did use public information, sampling fewer empty holes before departure when with the high-information partner than when with the low-information partner, and sampling fewer holes when with the low-information partner than when alone. We suggest that the degree to which personal and public information are used is likely to depend both on a forager’s ability to remember where it has already sampled and on the type of environment in which foraging takes place.

Key words Social foraging Patch sampling Public information Sturnidae 

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. Templeton
    • 1
  • Luc-Alain Giraldeau
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Concordia University, 1455 blvd. de Maisonneuve West, Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8

Personalised recommendations