Abstract
Insect societies are a paramount example of efficiency based upon division of labour. Social insect workers specialize on different tasks, such as brood care and foraging. This polyethism is underlined by the development of brain and olfactory organs. Nestmate recognition in ants is based on perception of chemical cues through olfaction; therefore, we asked whether task polyethism affects the ability of ants to discriminate friends from foes. We used the carpenter ant Camponotus aethiops to investigate the ability of three behavioural groups of worker (foragers, nurses and inactives) in recognizing intruders. Foragers, which are older workers mainly performing tasks outside the nest, showed higher levels of aggression towards intruders than nurses did. Foragers appeared to be more efficient at recognizing non-nestmate cues than did intra-nidal workers (nurses and inactives), and they possibly have higher motivation to attack. This suggests that ant workers change their olfactory sensitivity to non-nestmate stimuli during their life. This plasticity could be adaptive, as younger workers, who typically stay inside the nest, usually do not encounter intruders, while older workers have more experience outside the nest and differently developed neural circuits. A sensitive nestmate recognition system would thus be an unnecessary cost early in life.
Significance statement
Ants are known to divide their workforce, often as a product of age. Younger workers take on safer tasks such as taking care of the brood, while older workers are often involved with more dangerous tasks such as foraging and defending the nest. Here, we show that workers change their olfactory sensitivity to intruders during their life. As a result, foragers are better than nurses at detecting intruders. Furthermore, foragers appeared to not only be more sensitive but also have higher motivation to attack. The higher sensitivity of foragers is most likely adaptive, as younger workers stay in the nest and typically do not encounter intruders, and a sensitive recognition system would be for them an unnecessary cost.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson C (2001) The adaptive value of inactive foragers and the scout-recruit system in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Behav Ecol 12:111–119
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker BM (2011) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes
Behrends A, Scheiner R, Baker N, Amdam GV (2007) Cognitive aging is linked to social role in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Exp Gerontol 42:1146–1153. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2007.09.003
Boomsma JJ (2009) Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:3191–3207. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0101
Charbonneau D, Dornhaus A (2015) Workers “specialized” on inactivity: behavioural consistency of inactive workers and their role in task allocation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1459–1472
Charbonneau D, Hillis N, Dornhaus a. (2014) “Lazy” in nature: ant colony time budgets show high “inactivity” in the field as well as in the lab. Insectes Soc. doi: 10.1007/s00040-014-0370-6
Chittka L, Muller H (2009) Learning, specialization, efficiency and task allocation in social insects. Commun Integr Biol 2:151–154
Chittka L, Niven J (2009) Are bigger brains better? Curr Biol 19:R995–R1008. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.023
Chittka L, Thomson JD (1997) Sensori-motor learning and its relevance for task specialization in bumble bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:385–398. doi:10.1007/s002650050400
Cini A, Gioli L, Cervo R (2009) A quantitative threshold for nest-mate recognition in a paper social wasp. Biol Lett 5:459–461. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0140
d’Ettorre P, Heinze J, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Worker policing by egg eating in the ponerine ant Pachycondyla inversa. Proc Biol Sci 271:1427–1434. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2742
d’Ettorre P, Lenoir A (2010) Nestmate recognition. In: Lach L, Parr C, Abbot K (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Eggleton P (2011) An introduction to termites: biology, taxonomy and functional morphology. In: Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N (eds) Biology of Termites: A Modern Synthesis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–2
Errard C, Hefetz A (1997) Label familiarity and discriminatory ability of ants reared in mixed groups. Insectes Soc 44:189–198. doi:10.1007/s000400050040
Esponda F, Gordon DM (2015) Distributed nestmate recognition in ants. Proc R Soc B 282:20142838. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2838
Fahrbach SE, Moore D, Capaldi EA et al (1998) Experience-expectant plasticity in the mushroom bodies of the honeybee. Learn Mem 5:115–123. doi:10.1101/lm.5.1.115
Farris SM, Robinson GE, Fahrbach SE (2001) Experience- and age-related outgrowth of intrinsic neurons in the mushroom bodies of the adult worker honeybee. J Neurosci 21:6395–6404
Fresneau D, Dupuy P (1988) A study of polyethism in a ponerine ant: Neoponera apicalis (Hymenoptera, formicidae). Anim Behav 36:1389–1399
Giraldo YM, Traniello JFA (2014) Worker senescence and the sociobiology of aging in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1901–1919. doi:10.1007/s00265-014-1826-4
Gordon DM (2010) Ant encounters: interaction networks and colony behaviour. Princeton University Press
Gronenberg W, Heeren S, Hölldobler B (1996) Age-dependent and task-related morphological changes in the brain and the mushroom bodies of the ant Camponotus floridanus. J Exp Biol 199:2011–2019. doi:10.2307/2937655
Guerrieri FJ, d’Ettorre P (2008) The mandible opening response: quantifying aggression elicited by chemical cues in ants. J Exp Biol 211:1109–1113. doi:10.1242/jeb.008508
Hannonen M, Sledge MF, Turillazzi S, Sundström L (2002) Queen reproduction, chemical signalling and worker behaviour in polygyne colonies of the ant Formica fusca. Anim Behav 64:477–485. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.4001
Holman L, Dreier S, d’Ettorre P (2010) Selfish strategies and honest signalling: reproductive conflicts in ant queen associations. Proc Biol Sci 277:2007–2015. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2311
Ichinose K, Lenoir A (2010) Hydrocarbons detection levels in ants. Insectes Soc 57:453–455. doi:10.1007/s00040-010-0103-4
Jandt JM, Dornhaus A (2009) Spatial organization and division of labour in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens. Anim Behav 77:641–651. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.11.019
Jandt JM, Huang E, Dornhaus A (2009) Weak specialization of workers inside a bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) nest. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1829–1836. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0810-x
Jandt JM, Robins NS, Moore RE, Dornhaus A (2012) Individual bumblebees vary in response to disturbance: a test of the defensive reserve hypothesis. Insectes Soc 59:313–321. doi:10.1007/s00040-012-0222-1
Jaumann S, Scudelari R, Naug D (2013) Energetic cost of learning and memory can cause cognitive impairment in honeybees. Biol Lett 9:20130149. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0149
Jeanson R, Fewell JH, Gorelick R, Bertram SM (2007) Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:289–298. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0464-5
Larsen J, Fouks B, Bos N et al (2014) Variation in nestmate recognition ability among polymorphic leaf-cutting ant workers. J Insect Physiol 70:59–66. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.09.002
Lenoir A, Depickère S, Devers S et al (2009) Hydrocarbons in the ant Lasius niger: from the cuticle to the nest and home range marking. J Chem Ecol 35:913–921. doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9669-6
Libbrecht R, Oxley PR, Kronauer DJ, Keller L (2013) Ant genomics sheds light on the molecular regulation of social organization. Genome Biol 14:212. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-212
Mersch DP, Crespi A, Keller L (2013) Tracking individuals shows spatial fidelity is a key regulator of ant social organization. Science 340:1090–1093. doi:10.1126/science.1234316
Moroń D, Witek M, Woyciechowski M (2008) Division of labour among workers with different life expectancy in the ant Myrmica scabrinodis. Anim Behav 75:345–350. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.005
Muscedere ML, Traniello JF a (2012) Division of labor in the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole is associated with distinct subcaste- and age-related patterns of worker brain organization. PLoS One 7:e31618. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031618
Nehring V, Boomsma JJ, d’Ettorre P (2012) Wingless virgin queens assume helper roles in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Curr Biol 22:R671–R673. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.038
Nehring V, Wyatt TD, d’Ettorre P (2013) Noise in chemical communication. In: Brumm H (ed) Animal communication and noise. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 373–405
Oster GF, Wilson E (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Ottoni EB (2000) EthoLog 2.2: a tool for the transcription and timing of behavior observation sessions. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 32:446–449
Pearce AN, Huang ZY, Breed MD (2001) Juvenile hormone and aggression in honey bees. J Insect Physiol 47:1243–1247. doi:10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00109-3
R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing., ISBN 3–9000051–07–0
Ravary F, Lecoutey E, Kaminski G et al (2007) Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Curr Biol 17:1308–1312. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.047
Robinson G (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.37.1.637
Rosengren R (1977) Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). I. Age polyethism and topographic traditions. Acta Zool Fenn 149:1–29
Santos JC, Yamamoto M, Oliveira F, Del-Claro K (2005) Behavioral repertory of the weaver ant Camponotus (Myrmobrachys) senex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 46:27–37
Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: KJ R, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, 4th edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 69–96
Sobotnik J, Bourguignon T, Hanus R et al (2012) Explosive backpacks in old termite workers. Science 337:436–436. doi:10.1126/science.1219129
Starks PT (2004) Recognition systems: from components to conservation. Ann Zool Fennici 41:689–690
Stieb SM, Muenz TS, Wehner R, Rössler W (2010) Visual experience and age affect synaptic organization in the mushroom bodies of the desert ant Cataglyphis fortis. Dev Neurobiol 70:408–423. doi:10.1002/dneu.20785
Sturgis SJ, Gordon DM (2012) Nestmate recognition in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a review. Myrmecological News 16:101–110
Sturgis SJ, Gordon DM (2013) Aggression is task dependent in the red harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex barbatus). Behavioral Ecology 24:532–539
Thomas ML, Elgar MA (2003) Colony size affects division of labour in the ponerine ant Rhytidoponera metallica. Naturwissenschaften 90:88–92. doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0396-x
Tofilski A (2002) Influence of age polyethism on longevity of workers in social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:234–237. doi:10.1007/s00265-001-0429-z
Van Zweden J, d’Ettorre P (2010) Nestmate recognition in social insects and the role of hydrocarbons. In: Bagneres AG, Blomquist GJ (eds) Insect hydrocarbons: biology. Biohemistry and Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 222–243
Van Zweden JS, Fürst MA, Heinze J, D’Ettorre P (2007) Specialization in policing behaviour among workers in the ant Pachycondyla inversa. Proc Biol Sci 274:1421–1428. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0113
Waddington SJ, Hughes WOH (2010) Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior: the role of worker size, age and plasticity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1219–1228. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0936-x
Wilson EO (1980) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:157–165. doi:10.1007/BF00299521
Withers GS, Fahrbach SE, Robinson GE (1993) Selective neuroanatomical plasticity and division of labour in the honeybee. Nature 364:238–240. doi:10.1038/364238a0
Zhou S, Stone EA, Mackay TFC, Anholt RRH (2009) Plasticity of the chemoreceptor repertoire in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000681
Acknowledgements
Thanks to the members of the Centre for Social Evolution (CSE), University of Copenhagen for the pleasant working environment, in particular David Nash for providing useful comments. This study was supported by The Danish National Research Foundation (CSE), a Freia grant from the Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen and a Marie Curie Reintegration Grant, both assigned to PdE, and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), supporting VN. NB was supported by the Academy of Finland (decision numbers: 251337, 252411 and 289731) and the University of Helsinki.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by W. Hughes
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 99 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Larsen, J., Nehring, V., d’Ettorre, P. et al. Task specialization influences nestmate recognition ability in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70, 1433–1440 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2152-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2152-9