Original Paper

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 675-683

First online:

Females prefer males with superior fighting abilities but avoid sexually harassing winners when eavesdropping on male fights

  • David BierbachAffiliated withDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, J. W. Goethe University Frankfurt Email author 
  • , Vanessa SassmannshausenAffiliated withDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, J. W. Goethe University Frankfurt
  • , Bruno StreitAffiliated withDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, J. W. Goethe University Frankfurt
  • , Lenin Arias-RodriguezAffiliated withDivisión Académica de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco (UJAT)
  • , Martin PlathAffiliated withDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, J. W. Goethe University Frankfurt

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


Selection imposed by male competition (intrasexual selection) and female choice (intersexual selection) can be con- or discordant. Specifically, females may or may not prefer mating with dominant males, and direct costs of interacting with dominant (and possibly more harassing) males have been suggested to explain avoidance of dominant males. Here, we exemplify that inter- and intrasexual selection may normally act in the same direction, but can be temporarily conflicting when social information becomes available. Using video playback techniques, we presented females of the Mexican livebearing fish Poecilia mexicana with two size-matched males and established association preferences. Half of the females could then observe the same two males fight and establish dominance, while control females saw both males side by side, but physically separated, and female preferences were subsequently re-evaluated. Females in the control group showed a significant preference for future winners in the subsequent testing, confirming an innate or acquired preference for male traits that are indicative of physical superiority, even when body size as a choice criterion is excluded. When allowed to eavesdrop on male fights, however, females did not show a preference for observed winners and even decreased time spent with them relative to the control treatment in which no fight was shown. A subsequent experiment found contest winners to show elevated levels of sexual behavior, so we argue that the temporary offset of the intrinsic female preference for dominant males after having observed a fight is indeed driven by direct costs females expect from more harassing contest winners.


Female choice Social learning Sexual conflict Non-independent mate choice Male competition