Skip to main content
Log in

Dalliances and doubtful dads: what determines extra-pair paternity in socially monogamous wandering albatrosses?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic techniques have revealed surprisingly high rates of extra-pair paternity (EPP) in socially monogamous albatrosses. We sought to establish social and genetic influences on EPP in wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans) at Marion Island, where EPP rates were 14–24 % in three successive seasons. EPP probably resulted from both female solicited extra-pair behaviours and male forced copulations. EPP was not linked to breeding experience nor with poor reproductive performance, despite a tendency for pairs to consistently produce either EPP or within-pair paternity (WPP) chicks. Mate guarding may inhibit extra-pair behaviour; however, parental arrival date and presence in the colony prior to laying did not correlate with EPP. There was little support for genetic advantages to producing EPP chicks, but the population is characterised by low genetic variability, which may result in mate incompatibility. Mates of pairs that failed and pairs producing EPP young tended to be more similar genetically to their partners than mates producing WPP young, suggesting that EPP may counter mate incompatibility. EPP and WPP chicks grow equally well, so cuckolded males did not reduce investment in EPP chicks. The lack of discriminatory behaviour by cuckolded males together with low genetic diversity in the population may allow continued high levels of EPP. In albatrosses, pair bonds are typically long lasting and the costs of forming new pairings may discourage mate swapping. Females may undertake extra-pair copulations as an adaptive alternative to mate swapping because the costs of extra-pair behaviour are small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott CL, Double MC (2003) Genetic structure, conservation genetics and evidence of speciation by range expansion in shy and white-capped albatrosses. Mol Ecol 12:2953–2962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott CL, Double MC, Cockburn A (2006) Copulation behaviour and paternity in shy albatrosses (Thalassarche cauta). J Zool 270:628–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amos W, Worthington Wilmer J, Fullard K, Burg TM, Croxall JP, Bloch D, Coulson T (2001) The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2021–2027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio JM, Ortego J, Cordero PJ (2006) What should we weigh to estimate heterozygosity, alleles or loci? Mol Ecol 15:4659–4665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds. Evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist D, Andersson M, Küpper C, Cuthill IC, Kis J, Lanctot RB, Sandercock BK, Székely T, Wallander J, Kempenaers B (2002) Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds. Nature 419:613–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bried J, Jouventin P (2002) Site and mate choice in seabirds: an evolutionary approach. In: Schreiber EA, Burger J (eds) Biology of marine birds. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 263–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Bried J, Nicolaus M, Jarne P, Dubois M-P, Jouventin P (2007) Population biology of the wandering albatross (Diomedea exulans) in the Crozet and Kerguelen archipelagos, southern Indian Ocean, approached through genetic and demographic methods. J Zool 272:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL (1997) A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav Ecol 8:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Adams NJ (1984) Female wandering albatross Diomedea exulans raising a chick on its own at Marion Island. Cormorant 12:103–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Burg TM (1999) Primer Notes. Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in albatrosses. Mol Ecol 8:338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burg TM, Croxall JP (2004) Global population structure and taxonomy of the wandering albatross species complex. Mol Ecol 13:2345–2355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burg TM, Croxall JP (2006) Extrapair paternities in black-browed Thalassarche melanophris, grey-headed T. chrysostoma and wandering albatross Diomedea exulans at South Georgia. J Avian Biol 37:331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chastel O, Weimerskirch H, Jouventin P (1995) Influence of body condition on reproductive decision and reproductive success in the blue petrel. Auk 112:964–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohas A, Allainé D (2009) Social structure influences extra-pair paternity in socially monogamous mammals. Biol Lett 5:313–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2008) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org

  • Dubois F, Wajnberg É, Cézilly F (2004) Optimal divorce and re-mating strategies for monogamous female birds: a simulation model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M-P, Jarne P, Jouventin P (2005) Ten polymorphic microsatellite markers in the wandering albatross Diomedea exulans. Mol Ecol Notes 14:905–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fietz J, Zischler H, Schwiegk C, Tomiuk J, Dausmann KH, Ganzhorn JU (2000) High rates of extra-pair young in the pair-living fat-tailed dwarf lemur, Cheirogaleus medius. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:8–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT (2003) Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature 425:715–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frasier TR (2008) STORM: software for testing hypotheses of relatedness and mating patterns. Mol Ecol Resour 8:1263–1266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fridolfsson A-K, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green AJ (2001) Mass/length residuals: measures of body condition or generations of spurious results? Ecology 82:1473–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JP, Shonkwiler JS (2001) Morphological indicators of body condition: useful or wishful thinking? In: Speakman JR (ed) Body composition analysis of animals: a handbook of non-destructive methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 8–38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Højsgaard S, Halekoh U, Yan J (2005) The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw 15:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyvaert KP, Parker PG (2010) Extra-pair paternity in waved albatrosses: genetic relationships among females, social mates and genetic sires. Behaviour 147:1591–1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyvaert KP, Anderson DJ, Jones TC, Duan W, Parker PG (2000) Extra-pair paternity in waved albatrosses. Mol Ecol 9:1415–1419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huyvaert KP, Anderson DJ, Parker PG (2006) Mate opportunity hypothesis and extrapair paternity in waved albatross (Phoebastria irrorata). Auk 123:524–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inchausti P, Weimerskirch H (2002) Dispersal and metapopulation dynamics of an oceanic seabird, the wandering albatross, and its consequences for its response to long-line fisheries. J Anim Ecol 71:765–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MGW (2011) Individual variation in reproductive success in the wandering albatross. Ph.D. thesis. Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, South Africa

  • Jouventin P, Lequette B, Dobson S (1999) Age-related mate choice in the wandering albatross. Anim Behav 57:1099–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jouventin P, Charmantier A, Dubois M-P, Jarne P, Bried J (2007) Extra-pair paternity in the strongly monogamous wandering albatross Diomedea exulans has no apparent benefits for females. Ibis 149:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Van den Broeck M, Burke T, Van Broeckhoven C, Dhondt AA (1992) Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357:494–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CC, Weeks DE, Chakravarti A (1993) Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness. Hum Hered 43:45–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauck RA, Marschall EA, Parker PG (1999) Adult survival and imperfect assessment of parentage: effects on male parenting decisions. Am Nat 154:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (2000) Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extra pair paternity. Behav Ecol 11:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1993) Certainty of paternity covaries with paternal care in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Brohede J, Cuervo JJ, de Lope F, Primmer C (2003) Extrapair paternity in relation to sexual ornamentation, arrival date, and condition in a migratory bird. Behav Ecol 14:707–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munshi-South J (2007) Extra-pair paternity and the evolution of testis size in a behaviorally monogamous tropical mammal, the large treeshrew (Tupaia tana). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:210–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1989) Lifetime reproduction in birds. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M, Kempenaers B (1998) Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends Ecol Evol 13:52–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prince PA, Ricketts C (1981) Relationships between food supply and growth in albatrosses: an interspecific chick fostering experiment. Ornis Scand 12:207–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JD, Colwell MA, Cooke F (1986) Sexual selection and spring arrival times of red-necked and Wilson's phalaropes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts C, Prince PA (1981) Comparison of growth of albatrosses. Ornis Scand 12:120–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1973) Patterns of growth in birds. II. Growth rate and mode of development. Ibis 115:177–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rios-Cardenas O, Webster MS (2005) Paternity and paternal effort in the pumpkinseed sunfish. Behav Ecol 16:914–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PG, Phillips RA, Nel DC, Wood AG (2007) Breeding frequency in grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche chrysostoma. Ibis 149:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Hostedde AI, Zinner B, Millar JS, Hickling GJ (2005) Restitution of mass-size residuals: validating body condition indices. Ecology 86:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutchbury BJM (1998) Female mate choice of extra-pair males: breeding synchrony is important. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:213–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickell WLN (1968) Biology of the great albatrosses, Diomedea exulans and Diomedea epomophora. Antarct Res Ser 12:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickell WLN (2000) Albatrosses. Pica, Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited Review. Mol Ecol 9:1013–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van de Casteele T, Galbusera P, Matthysen E (2001) A comparison of microsatellite based pairwise relatedness estimators. Mol Ecol 10:1539–1549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weimerskirch H (1995) Regulation of foraging trips and incubation routine in male and female wandering albatrosses. Oecologia 102:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimerskirch H, Lequette B, Jouventin P (1989) Development and maturation of plumage in the wandering albatross Diomedea exulans. J Zool 219:411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimerskirch H, Barbraud C, Lys P (2000) Sex differences in parental investment and chick growth in wandering albatross: fitness consequences. Ecology 81:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimerskirch H, Lallemand J, Martin J (2005) Population sex ratio variation in a monogamous long-lived bird, the wandering albatross. J Anim Ecol 74:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Sargent RC (1996) Sex and parenting: the effect of sexual conflict and parentage on parental strategies. Trends Ecol Evol 11:87–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Sherman PW, Morton ML (1990) The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. Curr Ornithol 7:331–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Wink M, Dyrcz A (1999) Mating systems in birds: a review of molecular studies. Acta Ornithol 34:91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan J (2002) geepack: yet another package for generalized estimating equations. R-News 2(3):12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan J, Fine JP (2004) Estimating equations for association structures. Stat Med 23:859–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young LC, Zaun BJ, VanderWerf EA (2008) Successful same-sex pairing in Laysan albatross. Biol Lett 4:323–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1996) The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1711–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2003) Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility. Ethology 109:929–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Quentin Hagens for valuable advice and assistance in formative stages of fieldwork. Henk Louw, Edith Mertz and Paul Visser gave extensive assistance with fieldwork. Some data are from long-term monitoring of wandering albatrosses at Marion Island, which was initiated by John Cooper. Some genetic analyses were performed at the DNA Sequencing Unit, Central Analytical Facility, Stellenbosch University. We thank two reviewers for their thoughtful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Financial and logistical support was provided by the DST/NRF Centre of Excellence (CoE) at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology and the South African National Antarctic Programme (through the National Research Foundation).

Ethical standards

Research conducted was approved by University of Cape Town’s Animal Ethics Committee and the Prince Edward Islands’ Management Committee. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Genevieve W. Jones.

Additional information

Communicated by C. R. Brown

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 13.8 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, M.G.W., Techow, N.M.S.M. & Ryan, P.G. Dalliances and doubtful dads: what determines extra-pair paternity in socially monogamous wandering albatrosses?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66, 1213–1224 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1374-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1374-8

Keywords

Navigation