Abstract
The benefits of grouping behaviour may not be equally distributed across all individuals within a group, leading to conflict over group membership among established group members, and between residents and outsiders attempting to join a group. Although the interaction between the preferences of joining individuals and existing group members may exert considerable pressure on group structure, empirical work on group living to date has focussed on free entry groups, in which all individuals are permitted entry. Using the humbug damselfish, Dascyllus aruanus, we examined a restricted entry grouping system, in which group residents control membership by aggressively rejecting potential new members. We found that the preferences shown by joining members were not always aligned with strategies that incurred the least harm from resident group members, suggesting a conflict between the preferences of residents and preferences of group joiners. Solitary fish preferred to join familiar groups and groups of size-matched residents. Residents were less aggressive towards familiar group joiners. However, resident aggression towards unfamiliar individuals depended on the size of the joining individual, the size of the resident and the composition of the group. These results demonstrate that animal group structure is mediated by both the preferences of joining individuals and the preferences of residents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G (2008) Choice of female groups by male mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Ethology 114:479–488
Alexander R (1974) The evolution of social behaviour. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383
Asoh K (2003) Gonadal development and infrequent sex change in a population of the humbug damselfish, Dascyllus aruanus in continuous coral-cover habitat. Mar Biol 142:1207–1218
Barber I, Ruxton GD (2000) The importance of stable schooling: do familiar sticklebacks stick together? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:151–155
Ben-Tzvi O, Kiflawi M, Polak O, Abelson A (2009) The effect of adult aggression on habitat selection by settlers of two coral-dwelling damselfishes. Plos One 4:8
Booth DJ (1992) Larval settlement-patterns and preferences by Domino damselfish Dascyllus albisella Gill. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 155:85–104
Booth DJ (1995) Juvenile groups in a coral-reef damselfish—density-dependent effects on individual fitness and population demography. Ecology 76:91–106
Booth DJ, Wellington G (1995) Settlement preferences in coral-reef fishes: effects on patterns of adult and juvenile distributions, individual fitness and population structure. In: Joint United-States/Australia Workshop on Recruitment and Population Dynamics of Coral-Reef Fishes (Reefish 95), Kuranda, Australia, pp 274–279
Buston PM, Fauvelot C, Wong MYL, Planes S (2009) Genetic relatedness in groups of the humbug damselfish Dascyllus aruanus: small, similar-sized individuals may be close kin. Mol Ecol 18:4707–4715
Caraco T, Wolf LL (1975) Ecological determinants of group sizes of foraging lions. Am Nat 109:343–352
Clutton-Brock TH, Gaynor D, McIlrath GM, Maccoll ADC, Kansky R, Chadwick P, Manser M, Skinner JD, Brotherton PNM (1999) Predation, group size and mortality in a cooperative mongoose, Suricata suricatta. J Anim Ecol 68:672–683
Coates D (1980) Prey-size intake in humbug damselfish, Dascyllus aruanus (Pisces, Pomacentridae) living within social-groups. J Anim Ecol 49:335–340
Coolen I (2002) Increasing foraging group size increases scrounger use and reduces searching efficiency in nutmeg mannikins (Lonchura punctulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:232–238
Croft DP, James R, Ward AJW, Botham MS, Mawdsley D, Krause J (2005) Assortative interactions and social networks in fish. Oecologia 143:211–219
Dugatkin LA, Sih A (1998) Evolutionary ecology of partner choice. In: Dukas R (ed) Cognitive ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 379–403
Forrester GE (1990) Factors influencing the juvenile demography of a coral-reef fish. Ecology 71:1666–1681
Forrester GE (1991) Social rank, individual size and group composition as determinants of food-consumption by humbug damselfish, Dascyllus aruanus. Anim Behav 42:701–711
Giraldeau LA, Gillis D (1988) Do lions hunt in group sizes that maximize hunters daily food returns. Anim Behav 36:611–613
Grand TC, Dill LM (1999) The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition? Anim Behav 58:443–451
Griffiths SW, Brockmark S, Hojesjo J, Johnsson JI (2004) Coping with divided attention: the advantage of familiarity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:695–699
Heg D, Bachar Z, Brouwer L, Taborsky M (2004) Predation risk is an ecological constraint for helper dispersal in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:2367–2374
Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ (2002) Competition for shelter space causes density-dependent predation mortality in damselfishes. Ecology 83:2855–2868
Jaeger RG (1981) Dear enemy recognition and the costs of aggression between salamanders. Am Nat 117:962–974
Jones GP (1987a) Competitive interactions among adults and juveniles in a coral-reef fish. Ecology 68:1534–1547
Jones GP (1987b) Some interactions between residents and recruits in 2 coral-reef fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 114:169–182
Jordan L, Wong M, Balshine S (2010) The effects of familiarity and social hierarchy on group membership decisions in a social fish. Biology Letters. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.073
Karplus I, Katzenstein R, Goren M (2006) Predator recognition and social facilitation of predator avoidance in coral reef fish Dascyllus marginatus juveniles. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 319:215–223
Katzir G (1981) Aggression by the damselfish Dascyllus aruanus L towards conspecifics and heterospecifics. Anim Behav 29:835–841
Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford university Press, New York
Krebs JR, Ryan JC, Charnov EL (1974) Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging—study of patch use by chickadees. Anim Behav 22:953
Lima SL (1995) Collective detection of predatory attack by social foragers—fraught with ambiguity. Anim Behav 50:1097–1108
Lima SL, Zollner PA, Bednekoff PA (1999) Predation, scramble competition, and the vigilance group size effect in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:110–116
Martinez FA, Marschall EA (1999) A dynamic model of group-size choice in the coral reef fish Dascyllus albisella. Behavioral Ecology 10:572–577
Morgan MJ (1988) The influence of hunger, shoal size and predator presence on foraging in bluntnose minnows. Anim Behav 36:1317–1322
Pitcher TJ, Magurran AE, Winfield IJ (1982) Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:149–151
Pitcher TJ, Green DA, Magurran AE (1986) Dicing with death—predator inspection behavior in minnow shoals. J Fish Biol 28:439–448
Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs CJ, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 122–147
Rubenstein DI (1981) Individual variation and competition in the everglades pygmy sunfish. J Anim Ecol 50:337–350
Sale PF (1971) Extremely limited home range in a coral reef fish, Dascyllus aruanus (Pisces, Pomacentridae). Copeia 1971:325–327
Slotow R, Paxinos E (1997) Intraspecific competition influences food return-predation risk trade-off by White-crowned Sparrows. Condor 99:642–650
Stephens PA, Russell AF, Young AJ, Sutherland WJ, Clutton-Brock TH (2005) Dispersal, eviction, and conflict in meerkats (Suricata suricatta): an evolutionarily stable strategy model. Am Nat 165:120–135
Sweatman HPA (1983) Influence of conspecifics on choice of settlement sites by larvae of 2 pomacentrid fishes (Dascyllus aruanus and Dascyllus reticulatus) on coral reefs. Mar Biol 75:225–229
Sweatman HPA (1985) The influence of adults of some coral-reef fishes on larval recruitment. Ecol Monogr 55:469–485
Taborsky M (1984) Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi—their costs and benefits. Anim Behav 32:1236–1252
Ward AJW, Hart PJB (2003) The effects of kin and familiarity on interactions between fish. Fish Fish 4:348–358
Ward AJW, Hart PJB (2005) Foraging benefits of shoaling with familiars may be exploited by outsiders. Anim Behav 69:329–335
Ward AJW, Krause J (2001) Body length assortative shoaling in the European minnow, Phoxinus phoxinus. Anim Behav 62:617–621
Willmer PG (1985) Thermal ecology, size effects, and the origins of communal behaviour in Cerceris Wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:151–160
Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Prof. David Booth for advice on the biology and behaviour of Dascyllus spp., and Kylie, Dave, Russ and Jen at One Tree Island Research Station for their assistance in the field. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the manuscript. LAJ, JEHR, CA, DIR and AJWW were supported by funds supplied by University of Sydney. DIR was also supported by the Class of 1877 Research Fund. Australian ethics approval for this study was granted by the University of Sydney’s Animal Ethics Committee (L04/9-2008/1/4877). After experiments were completed, fishes were returned to where they were caught. Fishes were kept in captivity for a maximum of 4 days.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by: C. St. Mary
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jordan, L.A., Avolio, C., Herbert-Read, J.E. et al. Group structure in a restricted entry system is mediated by both resident and joiner preferences. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64, 1099–1106 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0924-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0924-1