Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 63, Issue 10, pp 1411–1426

Behavioral evolution in the major worker subcaste of twig-nesting Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): does morphological specialization influence task plasticity?


    • Biology DepartmentBoston University
  • James F. A. Traniello
    • Biology DepartmentBoston University
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0797-3

Cite this article as:
Mertl, A.L. & Traniello, J.F.A. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2009) 63: 1411. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0797-3


Polymorphism frequently correlates with specialized labor in social insects, but extreme morphologies may compromise behavioral flexibility and thus limit caste evolution. The ant genus Pheidole has dimorphic worker subcastes in which major workers appear limited due to their morphology to performing defensive or trophic functions, thus providing an ideal model to investigate specialization and plasticity. We examined worker morphology, brood-care flexibility, and subcaste ratio in 17 species of tropical twig-nesting Pheidole by quantifying nursing by major workers in natural colonies and in subcolonies lacking minors, in which we also measured brood survival and growth. Across species, majors performed significantly less brood care than minors in intact colonies, but increased rates of brood care 20-fold in subcolonies lacking minors. Brood nursed by majors had lower survival than brood tended by minors, although rates of brood growth did not vary between subcastes. Significant interspecific variation in rates of brood care by major workers did not lead to significant differences in brood growth or survival. Additionally, we did not find a significant association between the degree of major worker morphometric specialization and rates of nursing, growth, or survival of brood among species. Therefore, major workers showed reduced efficacy of brood care, but the degree of morphological specialization among species did not directly compromise task plasticity. The compact nests and all-or-nothing consequences of predation or disturbance on colony fitness may have influenced the evolution of major worker brood-care competency in twig-nesting Pheidole.


Caste evolutionDivision of laborPolyethismResponse thresholdTrade-off

Supplementary material

265_2009_797_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (9 kb)
Table S1List of tasks observed during full colony ethograms. Tasks are categorized as brood-care and nonbrood-care tasks (PDF 9 kb)
265_2009_797_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (15 kb)
Table S2Number of brood-care acts observed during intact colony ethograms and monocaste subcolony observations. Means (standard deviations) of total acts observed per colony are shown; values are not corrected for number of ants, number of brood, or observation time (PDF 15 kb)
265_2009_797_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (14 kb)
Table S3Proportion of brood of various developmental stages surviving in monocaste subcolonies. Z and P values represent Wilcoxon sign rank tests comparing the survival of brood cared for by major workers to those cared for by minor workers from the same colony after 1 and 2 weeks. n number of colonies (Table 1) (PDF 13 kb)
265_2009_797_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (69 kb)
Table S4Eigenvectors for the first three principal components in an analysis of an unrotated correlation matrix of Z scores for seven variables, which represent the degree of morphological difference between majors and minor for ten Pheidole species. These three principal components explained 85.1% of the total variance and were the only components with eigenvalues greater than one. PCA components were interpreted based on the morphological variables with strong loadings on each component. Loadings ≥0.49 or ≤ −0.49 were considered “strong” are and shown in bold (PDF 68 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009