Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 347–356

Weighting waiting in collective decision-making

  • Robert Planqué
  • Anna Dornhaus
  • Nigel R. Franks
  • Tim Kovacs
  • James A. R. Marshall
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00265-006-0263-4

Cite this article as:
Planqué, R., Dornhaus, A., Franks, N.R. et al. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2007) 61: 347. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0263-4

Abstract

Animals searching for food, mates, or a home often need to decide when to stop looking and choose the best option found so far. By re-analyzing experimental data from experiments by Mallon et al. (Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:352–359, 2001), we demonstrate that house-hunting ant colonies are gradually more committed to new nests during the emigration. Early in house-hunting, individual ants were flexibly committed to new nest sites. However, when carrying to a new nest had started, ants hardly ever switched preference. Using a theoretical model based on experimental data, we test at which stage flexible commitment influences speed and accuracy most. We demonstrate that ant colonies have found a good compromise between impatience and procrastination. Early flexibility combined with later rigidity is identically effective as other strategies that include flexible commitment, but it is particularly good when emigration conditions are harsh.

Keywords

House-hunting behaviorAntsDecision-makingEmigration

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Planqué
    • 1
    • 3
  • Anna Dornhaus
    • 2
  • Nigel R. Franks
    • 3
  • Tim Kovacs
    • 1
  • James A. R. Marshall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceBristol UniversityBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesBristol UniversityBristolUK