Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 51, Issue 5, pp 447–454

Laying date and laying sequence influence the sex ratio of crimson rosella broods

  • Elizabeth A. Krebs
  • David J. Green
  • Michael C. Double
  • Richard Griffiths
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00265-002-0459-1

Cite this article as:
Krebs, E.A., Green, D.J., Double, M.C. et al. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2002) 51: 447. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0459-1

Abstract.

We examine the patterns of sex allocation in crimson rosellas Platycercus elegans, a socially monogamous Australian parrot. Overall, 41.8% of nestlings were male, a significant female bias. However underlying this population-level bias were non-random patterns of sex allocation within broods. Broods produced early in the season were female-biased, but the proportion of males in a brood increased as the breeding season progressed. Female rosellas may obtain greater fitness benefits from early-fledging daughters than sons because daughters can breed as 1-year-olds whereas sons do not breed until they are at least 2 years old. Laying date and laying sequence also interacted to influence the sex ratio of eggs. The sex of early-laid eggs strongly followed the brood level pattern, whereas the sex of middle- and late-laid eggs did not change significantly as the season progressed. Nevertheless, late-laid eggs were very unlikely to be male at the end of the season. We argue these differing seasonal patterns reflect the relative costs and benefits to producing early-hatched males and females at different times of the season. Female rosellas appear to maximise the probability that daughters are able to breed early but to minimise competitive asymmetries within the brood. In particular, late-hatched male chicks are disadvantaged if their oldest sibling is male, explaining the dearth of broods containing late-hatched males at the end of the breeding season.

Hatch order Parrots Seasonal patterns Sex allocation Sibling competition 

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth A. Krebs
    • 1
  • David J. Green
    • 1
  • Michael C. Double
    • 2
  • Richard Griffiths
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Zoology and Entomology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
  2. 2.Division of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
  3. 3.DEEB, Graham Kerr Building, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

Personalised recommendations