International Orthopaedics

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 451–456

Evaluation of a reconstruction reverse shoulder for tumour surgery and tribological comparision with an anatomical shoulder arthroplasty

  • Ralf Dieckmann
  • Dennis Liem
  • Georg Gosheger
  • Marcel-Philipp Henrichs
  • Steffen Höll
  • Jendrik Hardes
  • Arne Streitbürger
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1771-7

Cite this article as:
Dieckmann, R., Liem, D., Gosheger, G. et al. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2013) 37: 451. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1771-7

Abstract

Purpose

The functional results after reconstruction of the proximal humerus in tumour surgery are poor. Therefore, a reversed proximal humerus replacement was developed in our institution (MUTARS humerus inverse). A low degree of wear on the polyethylene is required because of the patients’ youth and demands on shoulder function. A special type of polyethylene with shock-absorbing properties has been developed to minimise polyethylene wear in the MUTARS inverse proximal humerus replacement. We compared the tribological properties of an anatomical shoulder prosthesis (CAPICA) with the new reversed proximal humerus replacement (MUTARS humerus inverse).

Methods

Both prostheses were tested up to 5 × 106 cycles. Every millionth cycle the surface was inspected and a gravimetric measurement was performed. A measurement of surface roughness was done before testing and after 5 × 106 cycles.

Results

In both prostheses after 5 × 106 cycles there were no major defects, such as delamination, observed. In the reversed proximal humerus replacement abrasion of 28 mg/106 cycles was detected. The mean abrasion of the anatomical prosthesis was 9.28 mg/ 106 cycles.

Conclusion

The glenoid component of the first reversed humerus replacement (MUTARS humerus inverse) has wear properties comparable to those of normal reversed shoulder prostheses. This is important, as this type of prosthesis is used in young patients after resection of bone tumours, with a good functional outcome. It can, therefore, be expected that the revision rate due to wear will be as high as in patients with normal reversed shoulder prostheses.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralf Dieckmann
    • 1
  • Dennis Liem
    • 1
  • Georg Gosheger
    • 1
  • Marcel-Philipp Henrichs
    • 1
  • Steffen Höll
    • 1
  • Jendrik Hardes
    • 1
  • Arne Streitbürger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor OrthopaedicsMünster University HospitalMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations