Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
On the basis of positive clinical results with mid- and long-term follow-up using the Mayo short stem, the Metha neck-preserving stem (BBraun, Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) was introduced. The purpose of this study was to validate the implant design by direct acquisition of bone remodelling data from total hip arthroplasty (THA) recipients using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
After power analysis, 25 patients were included in this prospective study. Patients were examined clinically and underwent DEXA examinations preoperatively and postoperatively at one week, six months and one and two years after THA. Gruen zones were adapted to the short stem design (R1–R7).
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) increased significantly by 31 points. No stem had to be revised. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the greater trochanter decreased significantly from 0.78 g/cm2 postoperatively to 0.72 g/cm2 two years after surgery. Marginal changes were seen in the lateral distal regions (R4–R5). In the minor trochanter region, BMD increased significantly after two years by 12.9%. In the calcar region, BMD exceeded the baseline value by 6.1% two years after implantation.
Stress shielding seems to occur at the greater trochanter due to the vast cross-section of the implant. However, the aim of proximal load transfer of the Metha stem seems to be partially achieved. DEXA analysis revealed a concentrated load distribution on the medial portion of the femur, which is an important region to guarantee long-term implant survival.
- Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M (2000) A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:952–8 CrossRef
- Huiskes R, Weinans H, van RB (1992) The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 124–34.
- Falez F, Casella F, Panegrossi G et al (2008) Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems. J Orthop Traumatol 9:49–54 CrossRef
- Brodner W, Bitzan P, Lomoschitz F et al (2004) Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:20–6
- Sabo D, Reiter A, Simank HG et al (1998) Periprosthetic mineralization around cementless total hip endoprosthesis: longitudinal study and cross-sectional study on titanium threaded acetabular cup and cementless Spotorno stem with DEXA. Calcif Tissue Int 62:177–82 CrossRef
- Speirs AD, Heller MO, Taylor WR et al (2007) Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 22:431–9 CrossRef
- Cohen B, Rushton N (1995) Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:479–83
- Martini F, Lebherz C, Mayer F et al (2000) Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1065–71 CrossRef
- Mortimer ES, Rosenthall L, Paterson I, Bobyn JD (1996) Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269–74.
- Albanese CV, Rendine M, De PF et al (2006) Bone remodelling in THA: A comparative DXA scan study between conventional implants and a new stemless femoral component. A preliminary report. Hip Int 16(Suppl 3):9–15
- Panisello JJ, Herrero L, Herrera A et al (2006) Bone remodelling after total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented anatomic femoral stem: a three-year prospective study using bone densitometry. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong ) 14:32–7
- Aldinger PR, Sabo D, Pritsch M et al (2003) Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 73:115–21 CrossRef
- Korovessis P, Droutsas P, Piperos G et al (1997) Course of bone mineral content changes around cementless Zweymueller total hip arthroplasty. A 4-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:60–5 CrossRef
- Skoldenberg OG, Boden HS, Salemyr MO et al (2006) Periprosthetic proximal bone loss after uncemented hip arthroplasty is related to stem size: DXA measurements in 138 patients followed for 2–7 years. Acta Orthop 77:386–92 CrossRef
- Mulier M, Jaecques SV, Raaijmaakers M et al (2011) Early periprosthetic bone remodelling around cemented and uncemented custom-made femoral components and their uncemented acetabular cups. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:941–8 CrossRef
- Pitto RP, Hayward A, Walker C, Shim VB (2010) Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study. Int Orthop 34:783–7 CrossRef
- Rahmy AI, Gosens T, Blake GM et al (2004) Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporos Int 15:281–9 CrossRef
- Braun A, Lazovic D, Zigan R (2007) Modular short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implant positioning and the influence of navigation. Orthopedics 30:148–52
- Katano H (2007) Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density in Bicontact SD Stem. Five to Ten Years Follwo-up. In: Weller S, Braun A, Eingartner C, Maurer F, Weise K, Winter E, Volkmann R (eds) The Bicontact Hip Arthroplasty System 1987–2007. Tübingen, Georg Thieme Verlag, pp 63–69
- Thorey F, Lerch M, Klages P, et al. (2010) Ist eine metaphysäre Verankerung durch neue Kurzschaftsysteme realisierbar? Welche Potentiale verbergen sich hinter diesen Designkonzepten für unseren Klinikalltag? 58 Jahrestagung der Vereinigung Süddeutscher Orthopäden e V Poster No. 48:
- Albanese CV, Santori FS, Pavan L et al (2009) Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems: 37 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop 80:291–7 CrossRef
- Decking R, Puhl W, Simon U, Claes LE (2006) Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 21:495–501 CrossRef
- Sychterz CJ, Topoleski LD, Sacco M, Engh CA, Sr. (2001) Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 218–27.
- Tanzer M, Kantor S, Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD (2001) Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 16:552–8 CrossRef
- Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, et al. (1992) Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 79–96.
- Munting E, Smitz P, Van SN et al (1997) Effect of a stemless femoral implant for total hip arthroplasty on the bone mineral density of the proximal femur. A prospective longitudinal study. J Arthroplasty 12:373–9 CrossRef
- Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study
Volume 36, Issue 3 , pp 533-538
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries Str. 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany
- 2. Institute of Metal Forming and Metal Forming Machines, Leibnitz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- 3. Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany