Abstract
Introduction
The relative ease of Internet access and its seemingly endless amount of information creates opportunities for Americans to research medical diseases, diagnoses, and treatment plans. Our objective is quantitative evaluation of the readability level of patient education websites, written for the lay public, pertaining to common radiologic diagnostic test, and radiologic diagnoses specific to abdominal imaging.
Methods
In October 2015, 10 search terms were entered in the Google search engine, and the top 10 links for each term were collected and independently examined for their readability level using 10 well-validated quantitative readability scales. Search terms included CT abdomen, MRI abdomen, MRI enterography, ultrasound abdomen, X-ray abdomen, cholecystitis, diverticulitis, hepatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and pancreatitis. Websites not written exclusively for patients were excluded from the analysis.
Results
As a group, the 100 articles were assessed at an 11.7 grade level. Only 2% (2/100) were written at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and American Medical Association (AMA) suggested 3rd to 7th grade level to meet the 8th grade average reading level in the United States. In fact, 49% were written at a level that required a high school education or higher (greater than 12th grade).
Conclusions
With websites like radiologyinfo.org, generating over a million visitors a month, it is that clear there is a public interest in learning about radiology. However, given the discordance between the level of readability of the majority of the Internet articles and the NIH and AMA guidelines noted in this study on abdominal imaging readability, it is likely that many readers do not fully benefit from these resources on abdominal imaging.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Perrin A, Duggan M (2015) Americans’ internet access: 2000–2015. Pew Research Center.
Fox S (2011) The social life of health information, 2011. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project
Kane GC, Fichman RG, Gallaugher J, Glaser J (2009) Community relations 2.0. Harv Bus Rev 87(11):45–50
Rice RE (2006) Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inf 75:8–28. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032
Krane D (2005) The Harris Poll. 28th July. www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews2005Vol5_Iss08pdf. Accessed April 2007.
Kiley R (2005) Does the internet harm health? Some evidence exists that the internet does harm health. BMJ Br Med J 324(7331):238. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122149/.
Weisbord S, Soule J, Kimmel P (1997) Poison on line- acute renal failure caused by oil of wormwood purchased through the Internet. N Engl J Med 337(12):825–827
Commission TJ. What did the doctor say? Improving health literacy to protect patient safety. Health Care at the Crossroads series.
Weiss BD, Schwartzberg JG, Association AM (2007) Health literacy and patient safety: help patients understand [manual for clinicians]. Chicago, IL: AMA Foundation, p 2010
Lauder B, Gabel-Jorgensen N (2008) Recent research on health literacy, medication adherence, and patient outcomes. Home Heal Nurse 26(5):254–255
Albright J, de Guzman C, Acebo P, et al. (1996) Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice. Appl Nurs Res 9(3):139–143
Cooley ME, Moriarty H, Berger MS, et al. (1995) Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials. Oncol Nurs Forum 22:1345–1351
Kutner M, Greenburg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C (2006) The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. NCES 2006-483. National Center for Education Statistics.
Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A (2002) Adult literacy in America: a first look at the results of the national adult literacy survey. Natl Cent Educ Stat :178. NCES 1993-275.
National Assessment of Adult Literacy. http://nces.ed.gov/naal/.
Weis BD (2003) American Medical Foundation. Health literacy: a manual for clinicians. Chicago: American Medical Association.
How to Write Easy-to-Read Health Materials. MedlinePlus. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/etr.html. Accessed 19 June 2016.
Hansberry DR, John A, John E, et al. (2014) A critical review of the readability of online patient education resources from Radiologyinfo.Org. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 202(3):566–575. doi:10.2214/ajr.13.11223
Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Gonzales SF, Baker SR (2014) Are we effectively informing patients? A quantitative analysis of on-line patient education resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35(7):1270–1275. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3854
Hansberry DR, Kraus C, Agarwal N, Baker SR, Gonzales SF (2014) Health literacy in vascular and interventional radiology: a comparative analysis of online patient education resources. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 37(4):1034–1040. doi:10.1007/s00270-013-0752-6
Hansberry DR, Ramchand T, Patel S, et al. (2014) Are we failing to communicate? Internet-based patient education materials and radiation safety. Eur J Radiol 83(9):1698–1702. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.013
Prabhu AV, Agarwal N, Clump DA, DE Heron HDR (2016) Radiation oncology and online patient education materials: deviating from NIH and AMA recommendations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys . doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.2449
Agarwal N, Chaudhari A, Hansberry DR, et al. (2013) A comparative analysis of neurosurgical online education materials to assess patient comprehension. J Clin Neurosci 20(10):1357–1361. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.10.047
Agarwal N, Feghhi DP, Gupta R, et al. (2014) A comparative analysis of minimally invasive and open spine surgery patient education resources. J Neurosurg Spine 21(3):468–474. doi:10.3171/2014.5.SPINE13600
Hansberry DR, John A, John E, et al. (2014) A critical review of the readability of online patient education resources from Radiologyinfo.Org. AJR 20214:566–575. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11223
Agarwal N, Hansberry DR, Sabourin V, et al. (2013) A comparative analysis of the quality of patient education materials from medical specialties. JAMA Intern Med 173(13):1257. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6060
Agarwal N, Hansberry DR, Singh PL, Heary RF, Goldstein IM (2014) Quality assessment of spinal cord injury patient education resources. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000308
Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Baker SR (2015) Health literacy and online educational resources: an opportunity to educate patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(1):111–116. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13086
John AM, John ES, Hansberry DR, Thomas PJ, Guo S (2015) Analysis of online patient education materials in pediatric ophthalmology. J AAPOS 19(5):430–434. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.07.286
Kasabwala K, Misra P, Hansberry DR, et al. (2013) Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 3(4):325–333. doi:10.1002/alr.21097
Prabhu AV, Gupta R, Kim C, et al. (2016) Patient education materials in dermatology: addressing the health literacy needs of patients. JAMA Dermatol . doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1135
Hansberry DR, Kraus C, Agarwal N, Baker SR, Gonzales SF (2014) Health literacy in vascular and interventional radiology: a comparative analysis of online patient education resources. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37(4):1034–1040. doi:10.1007/s00270-013-0752-6
Huang G, Fang CH, Agarwal N, et al. (2015) Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations. JAMA Ophthalmol 133(4):449. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104
Colaco M, Svider PF, Agarwal N, et al. (2013) Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials. J Urol 189(3):1048–1052. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.255
Hansberry DR, Suresh R, Agarwal N, Heary RF, Goldstein IM (2013) Quality assessment of online patient education resources for peripheral neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst 18(1):44–47. doi:10.1111/jns5.12006
Svider PF, Agarwal N, Choudhry OJ, et al. (2011) Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments. Am J Otolaryngol 34(1):31–35. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.08.001
Misra P, Agarwal N, Kasabwala K, et al. (2013) readability analysis of healthcare-oriented education resources from the American academy of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. Laryngoscope 123(1):90–96. doi:10.1002/lary.23574
Hansberry DR, Ramchand T, Patel S, et al. (2014) Are we failing to communicate? Internet-based patient education materials and radiation safety. Eur J Radiol 83(9):1698–1702. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.013
Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Shah R, et al. (2014) Analysis of the readability of patient education materials from surgical subspecialties. Laryngoscope 124(2):405–412. doi:10.1002/lary.24261
Kasabwala K, Agarwal N, Hansberry DR, Baredes S, Eloy JA (2012) Readability assessment of patient education materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147(3):466–471. doi:10.1177/0194599812442783
Prabhu AV, Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Clump DA, Heron DE (2016) Radiation oncology and online patient education materials: deviating from NIH and AMA recommendations. Int J Radiat Oncol . doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.2449
Lindau ST, Tomori C, Lyons T, et al. (2002) The association of health literacy with cervical cancer prevention knowledge and health behaviors in a multiethnic cohort of women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(5):938–943. doi:10.1067/mob.2002.122091
Scott TL, Gazmararian JA, Williams M V, Baker DW (2002) Health literacy and preventive health care use among medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. Med Care 40(5). http://journals.lww.com/lww-medicalcare/Fulltext/2002/05000/Health_Literacy_and_Preventive_Health_Care_Use.5.aspx.
Howard DH, Gazmararian J, Parker RM (2005) The impact of low health literacy on the medical costs of Medicare managed care enrollees. Am J Med 118(4):371–377. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.010
Baker DW, Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, et al. (2002) Functional health literacy and the risk of hospital admission among medicare managed care enrollees. Am J Public Health 92(8):1278–1283. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.8.1278
Flesch R (1948) A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 32(3):221–233
Kincaid JP (1975) Derivation of new readability forumlas: “automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service
Chall JS (1995) Readability revisited: the new Dale–Chall readability formula. Northampton, MA: Brookline Books Cambridge
Caylor TG, Fox LC, Ford JP, Sticht JS (1973) Methodologies for determining reading requirements of military occupational specialties [Technical Report No. 73-5]. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization; 1973.
Fry E (1968) A readability formula that saves time. J Read 11:513–578
Raygor AL (1977) The raygor readability estimate: a quick and easy way to determine difficulty. In: Pearson PD, (ed). Reading: theory, research, and practice—26th yearbook of the national reading conference. Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.
McLaughlin GH (1969) SMOG grading: a new readability formula. J Read 12:639–646
Coleman TLML (1975) A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. J Appl Psychol 60:283–284
Gunning R (1952) The technique of clear writing. New York: McGraw-Hill
Korley FK, Pham JC, Kirsch TD, et al. (2010) Use of advanced radiology during visits to us emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998–2007. JAMA 304(13):1465. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1408
Hogan C, Sunshine JH, Schepps B (2001) Hiring of diagnostic radiologists in 1998. Am J Roentgenol 176(2):307–312. doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760307
Cypel YS, Sunshine JH (2003) Basic characteristics of radiology practices: results from the American College of Radiology’s 1999 survey. Am J Roentgenol 181(2):341–349. doi:10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810341
Weiss BD (2003) Health literacy: a manuel for clinicians. Chicago, IL: AMA Foundation
Center for Disease Control Prevention (2009) Simply put—a guide for creating easy to understand materials. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
RadiologyInfo.org. Reaches one million monthly visitors. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/eNews/Issue-13-March-2016/RadiologyInfo-Reaches-1-Million-Visitors.Published. 2016.
Walsh TM, Volsko TA (2008) Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. Respir Care 53(10):1310–1315
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Statement of informed consent was not applicable since the manuscript does not contain any patient data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansberry, D.R., Ayyaswami, V., Sood, A. et al. Abdominal imaging and patient education resources: enhancing the radiologist–patient relationship through improved communication. Abdom Radiol 42, 1276–1280 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0977-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0977-3