Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography in cervical compressive myelopathy: preliminary results
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To assess diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters in cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM) patients compared to normal volunteers, to relate them with myelopathy severity, and to relate tractography patterns with postoperative neurologic improvement.
Subjects and methods
Twenty patients suffering from CCM were prospectively enrolled (M:F = 13:7, mean age, 49.6 years; range 22–67 years) from September 2009 to March 2010. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) was used for the sagittal DTI. Twenty sex- and age-matched normal volunteers underwent the same scanning procedure. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the spinal cord were compared between the patients and normal volunteers and were related to myelopathy severity based on Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. Tractography patterns were related to myelopathy severity and postoperative improvement.
There were significant differences between patients and normal volunteers in terms of FA (0.498 ± 0.114 vs. 0.604 ± 0.057; p = 0.001) and ADC (1.442 ± 0.389 vs. 1.169 ± 0.098; p = 0.001). DTI parameters and tractography patterns were not related to myelopathy severity. In ten patients in the neurologically worse group, postoperative neurologic improvement was seen in four of five patients with intact fiber tracts, but only one of five patients with interrupted fiber tracts exhibited neurologic improvement.
DTI parameters in CCM patients were significantly different from those in normal volunteers but were not significantly related to myelopathy severity. The patterns of tractography appear to correlate with postoperative neurologic improvement.
- Ducreux D, Fillard P, Facon D, Ozanne A, Lepeintre JF, Renoux J, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord lesions: current and future indications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2007;17(1):137–47. CrossRef
- Clark CA, Werring DJ. Diffusion tensor imaging in spinal cord: methods and applications—a review. NMR Biomed. 2002;15(7–8):578–86. CrossRef
- Thurnher MM, Law M. Diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion-tensor imaging, and fiber tractography of the spinal cord. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009;17(2):225–44. CrossRef
- Lee JW, Kim JH, Kang HS, Lee JS, Choi JY, Yeom JS, et al. Optimization of acquisition parameters of diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging in the spinal cord. Invest Radiol. 2006;41(7):553–9. CrossRef
- Facon D, Ozanne A, Fillard P, Lepeintre JF, Tournoux-Facon C, Ducreux D. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord compression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(6):1587–94.
- Demir A, Ries M, Moonen CT, Vital JM, Dehais J, Arne P, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Radiology. 2003;229(1):37–43. CrossRef
- Mamata H, Jolesz FA, Maier SE. Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord: age and cervical spondylosis-related changes. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22(1):38–43. CrossRef
- Hesseltine SM, Law M, Babb J, Rad M, Lopez S, Ge Y, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in multiple sclerosis: assessment of regional differences in the axial plane within normal-appearing cervical spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(6):1189–93.
- Renoux J, Facon D, Fillard P, Huynh I, Lasjaunias P, Ducreux D. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in inflammatory diseases of the spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(9):1947–51.
- Lee JW, Park KS, Kim JH, Choi JY, Hong SH, Park SH, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in idiopathic acute transverse myelitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):W52–7. CrossRef
- Yu C, Lin F, Li K, Jiang T, Qin W, Sun H, et al. Pathogenesis of normal-appearing white matter damage in neuromyelitis optica: diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology. 2008;246(1):222–8. CrossRef
- Ozanne A, Krings T, Facon D, Fillard P, Dumas JL, Alvarez H, et al. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(7):1271–9. CrossRef
- Ellingson BM, Ulmer JL, Kurpad SN, Schmit BD. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in chronic spinal cord injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(10):1976–82. CrossRef
- Ducreux D, Lepeintre JF, Fillard P, Loureiro C, Tadie M, Lasjaunias P. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in 5 spinal cord astrocytomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(1):214–6.
- Werring DJ, Clark CA, Barker GJ, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1999;52(8):1626–32.
- van Hecke W, Nagels G, Emonds G, Leemans A, Sijbers J, van Goethem J, et al. A diffusion tensor imaging group study of the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis patients with and without T2 spinal cord lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30(1):25–34. CrossRef
- Xiangshui M, Xiangjun C, Xiaoming Z, Qingshi Z, Yi C, Chuanqiang Q, et al. 3 T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical myelopathy. Clin Radiol. 2010;65(6):465–73. CrossRef
- Song T, Chen WJ, Yang B, Zhao HP, Huang JW, Cai MJ, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(3):422–8. CrossRef
- Kerkovsky M, Bednarik JAP, Dusek L, Sprlakova-Pukova A, Urbanek IAP, Mechl MP, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic spinal cord compression: correlations between clinical and electrophysiological findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820e6c35
- Kara B, Celik A, Karadereler S, Ulusoy L, Ganiyusufoglu K, Onat L, et al. The role of DTI in early detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary study with 3-T MRI. Neuroradiology. 2011; doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0844-4
- Budzik JF, Balbi V, Le Thuc V, Duhamel A, Assaker R, Cotten A. Diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(2):426–33.
- Aota Y, Niwa T, Uesugi M, Yamashita T, Inoue T, Saito T. The correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical compression myelopathy with neurologic and radiologic severity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(7):814–20. CrossRef
- Bammer R, Auer M, Keeling SL, Augustin M, Stables LA, Prokesch RW, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging using single-shot SENSE-EPI. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48(1):128–36. CrossRef
- Mori S, van Zijl PC. Fiber tracking: principles and strategies—a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002;15(7–8):468–80. CrossRef
- Naderi S, Ozgen S, Pamir MN, Ozek MM, Erzen C. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting prognosis. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(1):43–9. discussion 49–50. CrossRef
- Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography in cervical compressive myelopathy: preliminary results
Volume 40, Issue 12 , pp 1543-1551
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Diffusion tensor imaging
- Cervical compressive myelopathy
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumidong, Bundag-Gu, Seong Nam, Gyeongi-do, 463–707, Korea
- 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeongi-Do, 463–707, Korea