Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with medial epicondylitis
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To compare the MR imaging findings of 13 patients with clinically diagnosed medial epicondylitis with the MR imaging findings of 26 patients of similar age with no clinical evidence of medial epicondylitis.
Design and patients
The study group consisted of 13 patients with clinically diagnosed medial epicondylitis. The control group consisted of 26 patients of similar age with no clinical evidence of medial epicondylitis. The medical records and MR imaging findings of these patients were retrospectively reviewed by two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists.
Eleven of the 13 patients in the study group had thickening and increased signal intensity of the common flexor tendon on both T1-weighted and T2-weighted images. The remaining two patients in the study group had soft tissue edema around a normal-appearing common flexor tendon. Twenty-one of the 26 patients in the control group had a normal-appearing common flexor tendon on MR imaging. Three patients in the control group had a thickened common flexor tendon which was of intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images but of uniform low signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Two patients in the control group had a thickened common flexor tendon which was of intermediate signal intensity on both T1-weighted and T2-weighted images. None of the patients in the control group had soft tissue edema around the common flexor tendon.
MR imaging findings of patients with clinically diagnosed medial epicondylitis included thickening and increased T1 and T2 signal intensity of the common flexor tendon and soft tissue edema around the common flexor tendon. The presence of intermediate to high T2 signal intensity or high T2 signal intensity within the common flexor tendon and the presence of paratendinous soft tissue edema were the most specific findings of medial epicondylitis on MR imaging.
- Ollivierre C, Nirschl R, Pettrone F. Resection and repair for medial tennis elbow. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23:214–221.
- Vangsness T, Jobe F. Surgical treatment of medial epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73:409–411.
- Martin C, Schweitzer M. MR imaging of epicondylitis. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27:133–138.
- Zwaan M, Rinase E, Weiss H, Vogel H, Pressler M. MR tomographie des Ellenbogengelenk. Digitale Bilddiagn 1989; 9:12–19.
- Potter H, Hannafin J, Morwessel R, DiCarlo E, O’Brien S, Altchek D. Lateral epicondylitis: correlation of MR imaging, surgical, and histopathologic findings. Radiology 1995; 196:43–46.
- Mirowitz S, London S. Ulnar collateral ligament injury in baseball pitchers: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1992; 185:573–578.
- Murphy B. MR imaging of the elbow. Radiology 1992; 184:525–529.
- Schwartz M, Al-Zahrani S, Morwessel R, Andrews J. Ulnar collateral ligament injury in the throwing athlete: evaluation with saline-enhanced MR arthrography. Radiology 1995; 197:297–299.
- Beltran J, Rosenberg Z. Diagnosis of compressive and entrapment neuropathies at the elbow: value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:525–531.
- Rosenberg Z, Beltran J, Cheung Y. The elbow: MR features of nerve disorders. Radiology 1993; 188:235–240.
- Regan W, Wold L, Coonrad R, Morrey B. Microscopic histopathology of chronic refractory lateral epicondylitis. Am J Sports Med 1992; 26:746–749.
- Doran A, Gresham G, Rushton N, Watson C. Tennis elbow: a clinicopathologic study of 22 cases followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61:535–538.
- Mackay D, Rangan A, Hide G, Hughes T, Latimer J. The objective diagnosis of early tennis elbow by magnetic resonance imaging. Occup Med 2003; 53:309–312.
- Erickson S, Cox I, Hyde J, Carrera G, Strandt J, Estrowski L. Effects of tendon orientation on MR imaging signal intensity: a manifestation of the “magic angle” phenomenon. Radiology 1991; 181:389–392.
- Erickson S, Prost R, Timins M. The “magic angle” effect: background physics and clinical relevance. Radiology 1993; 188:23–25.
- Hayes C, Parellada J. The “magic angle” effect in musculoskeletal imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 8:51–56.
- Schweitzer ME, Tran D, Deely DM, Hume E. Medial collateral ligament injuries: evaluation of multiple signs, prevalence and location of associated bone bruises, and assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 194:825–829.
- Grasel R, Schweitzer M, Kovalovich A. MR imaging of plantar fasciitis: edema, tears, and occult marrow abnormalities correlated with outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:699―701.
- Williams B, Schweitzer M, Weishaupt D, Lerman J, Rubenstein D, Miller L, Rosenberg Z. Partial tears of the distal biceps tendon: MR appearance and associated clinical findings. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30:560–564.
- Davidson P, Pink M, Perry J, Jobe F. Functional anatomy of the flexor pronator muscle group in relation to the medial collateral ligament of the elbow. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23:245–256.
- Bredella M, Tirman P, Fritz R, Feller J, Wischner T, Genant H. MR imaging findings of lateral ulnar collateral ligament abnormalities in patients with lateral epicondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:1379–1382.
- Pasternack I, Tuovian E, Lohman M, Vehnas T, Malmivaara A. MR findings in humeral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Acta Radiol 2001; 42:434–440.
- Coonrad R, Hooper R. Tennis elbow: its course, natural history, conservative and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55:1177–1182.
- Boyd H, McLeod A. Tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55:1183–1187.
- Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with medial epicondylitis
Volume 34, Issue 4 , pp 196-202
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Medial epicondylitis
- Industry Sectors