Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Growth recovery lines are more common in infants at high vs. low risk for abuse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Growth recovery lines, also known as growth arrest lines, are transverse radiodense metaphyseal bands that develop due to a temporary arrest of endochondral ossification caused by local or systemic insults.

Objective

To determine if growth recovery lines are more common in infants at high risk versus low risk for abuse.

Materials and methods

Reports of American College of Radiology compliant skeletal surveys (1999-2013) were reviewed with clinical records. Infants at low risk for abuse had a skull fracture without significant intracranial injury, history of a fall and clinical determination of low risk (child protection team/social work assessment). Infants at high risk had significant intracranial injury, retinal hemorrhages, other skeletal injuries and clinical determination of high risk. There were 52 low-risk infants (mean: 4.7 months, range: 0.4–12 months) and 21 high-risk infants (mean: 4.2 months, range: 0.8–9.1 months). Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated the skeletal survey radiographs of the knees/lower legs for the presence of at least one growth recovery line.

Results

When growth recovery lines are scored as probably present or definitely present, their prevalence in the low-risk group was 38% (standard deviation [SD] = 8%; reader 1 = 17/52, reader 2 = 23/52) vs. 71% (SD = 7%; reader 1 = 16/21, reader 2 = 14/21) in the high-risk group (P < 0.001; odds ratio 4.0, 95% CI: 1.7-9.5).

Conclusion

Growth recovery lines are encountered at a significantly higher rate in infants at high risk vs. low risk for abuse. This suggests that abused infants are prone to a temporary disturbance in endochondral ossification as a result of episodic physiological stresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Park EA, Richter CP (1953) Transverse lines in bone: the mechanism of their development. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 93:234–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wegner G (1874) Ueber das normale und pathologische Wachsthum de Röhrenknochen. Eine kritische Untersuchung auf experimenteller und casiustischer Grundlage. Virchows Archiv Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med 61:44–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gies T (1877) Experimentelle Untersuchungen über den Einfluss des Arsens auf den Organismus. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 8:175–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris H (1931) Lines of arrested growth in the long bones of diabetic children. Br Med J 1:713–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park EA (1964) The imprinting of nutritional disturbances on growing bones. Pediatrics 33:815–862

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mackie EJ, Ahmed YA, Tatarczuch L et al (2008) Endochondral ossification: how cartilage is converted to bone in the developing skeleton. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 40:46–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Platt HS, Stewart JC, Platt BS (1963) Transverse trabeculae in the bones of malnourished children. Proc Nutr Soc 22:xxix–xxx

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dreizen S, Currie C, Gilley EJ et al (1956) Observations of the association between nutritive failure, skeletal maturation rate and radiopaque transverse lines in the distal end of the radius in children. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 76:482–487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Acheson RM (1959) Effects of starvation, septicaemia and chronic illness on the growth cartilage plate and metaphysis of the immature rat. J Anat 93:123–130

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Alfonso-Durruty M (2011) Experimental assessment of nutrition and bone growth’s velocity effects on Harris lines formation. Am J Phys Anthropol 145:169–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park EA (1954) Bone growth in health and disease. Arch Dis Child 29:269–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Follis R, Park E (1952) Some observations on bone growth, with particular respect to zones and transverse lines of increased density in the metaphysis. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 68:709–724

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogden JA (1984) Growth slowdown and arrest lines. J Pediatr Orthop 4:409–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hummert JR, Van Gerven DP (1985) Observations on the formation and persistence of radiopaque transverse lines. Am J Phys Anthropol 66:297–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Papageorgopoulou C, Suter SK, Rühli FJ et al (2011) Harris lines revisited: prevalence, comorbidities, and possible etiologies. Am J Hum Biol 23:381–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleinman PK, Perez-Rossello JM, Newton AW et al (2011) Prevalence of the classic metaphyseal lesion in infants at low versus high risk for abuse. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1005–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. American College of Radiology (2011) SPR-ACR practice parameters for skeletal surveys in children. In: Pediatric practice parameters & technical standards. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garn S, Silverman F, Hertzog K et al (1968) Lines and bands of increased densitiy: their implication to growth and development. Med Radiogr Photogr 33:58–89

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gindhart PS (1969) The frequency of appearance of transverse lines in the tibia in relation to childhood illnesses. Am J Phys Anthropol 31:17–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mays S (1985) The relationship between Harris line formation and bone growth and development. J Archaeol Sci 12:207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mays S (1995) The relationship between Harris lines and other aspects of skeletal development in adults and juveniles. J Archaeol Sci 22:511–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scott AB, Hoppa RD (2015) A re-evaluation of the impact of radiographic orientation on the identification and interpretation of Harris lines. Am J Phys Anthropol 156:141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau (2015). Child maltreatment 2013. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment

  25. Block RW, Krebs NF, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, and American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition (2005) Failure to thrive as a manifestation of child neglect. Pediatrics 116:1234--1237

  26. Hernandez RJ, Poznanski AK, Hopwood NJ et al (1978) Incidence of growth lines in psychosocial dwarfs and idiopathic hypopituitarism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 131:477–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hynes D, O’Brien T (1988) Growth disturbance lines after injury of the distal tibial physis: their significance in prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 70:231–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jaramillo D, Hoffer FA, Shapiro F et al (1990) MR imaging of fractures of the growth plate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:1261–1265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ecklund K, Jaramillo D (2002) Patterns of premature physeal arrest: MR imaging of 111 children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:967–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kleinman P, Marks S, Blackbourne B (1986) The metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: a radiologic histopathologic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:896–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsai A, McDonald AG, Rosenberg AE et al (2014) High-resolution CT with histopathological correlates of the classic metaphyseal lesion of infant abuse. Pediatr Radiol 44:124–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kleinman PK, Marks SC Jr (1996) A regional approach to the classic metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: the proximal tibia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:421–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Teele RL, Abbott GD, Mogridge N et al (1999) Femoral growth lines: bony birthmarks in infants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:719–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. MacChiarelli R, Bondioli L, Censi L et al (1994) Intra- and interobserver concordance in scoring Harris lines: a test on bone sections and radiographs. Am J Phys Anthropol 95:77–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Suter S, Harders M, Papageorgopoulou C et al (2008) Technical note: standardized and semiautomated Harris lines detection. Am J Phys Anthropol 137:362–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Matthew A. Zapala, Andy Tsai & Paul K. Kleinman

  2. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, Benioff Children’s Hospital, 1975 Fourth St., San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA

    Matthew A. Zapala

Authors
  1. Matthew A. Zapala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andy Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul K. Kleinman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew A. Zapala.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zapala, M.A., Tsai, A. & Kleinman, P.K. Growth recovery lines are more common in infants at high vs. low risk for abuse. Pediatr Radiol 46, 1275–1281 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3621-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3621-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation