References
Yilmaz E, Mert C, Keskil Z, Tuglu D, Batislam E (2012) Effect of SWL on renal hemodynamics: could a change in renal artery contraction-relaxation responses be the cause? Urol Res 40:775–780
Eterović D, Lj Juretić-Kuščić, Čapkun V, Dujić Ž (1999) Pyelolithotomy improves while extracorporeal lithotripsy impairs kidney function. J Urol 161:39–44
Pearle MS (2012) Shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi. N Engl J Med 367:50–57
Eterović D, Šitum M, Punda A, Marković V, Kokić S (2010) Urinary obstruction depresses erythropoiesis which recovers after parenchyma-saving surgery but not SWL. Urol Res 38:51–56
Eterović D, Šitum M, Juretić-Kuščić Lj, Dujić Ž (2005) A decrease in blood pressure following pyelolithotomy but not extracorporeal lithotripsy. Urol Res 33:93–98
Verdecchia P, Gentile G, Angeli F, Mazzotta G, Mancia G, Reboldi G (2010) Influence of blood pressure reduction on composite cardiovascular endpoints in clinical trials. J Hypertens 28:1356–1365
Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M (2009) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cohrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD007044
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eterović, D., Šitum, M., Marković, V. et al. Wrong perspective obscures the adverse effects of shock-wave lithotripsy. Urolithiasis 41, 89–90 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0519-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0519-6