Skip to main content
Log in

Heat transfer and flow behavior around four staggered elliptic cylinders in cross flow

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental and numerical studies were carried out to investigate forced convection heat transfer and flow features around the downstream elliptic cylinder in four staggered cylinders in cross flow. The elliptic cylinders examined had an axis ratio (b/c) of 1:2, and they were arranged with zero angle of attack to the upstream flow. The present heat transfer measurements were obtained by heating only the downstream elliptic cylinder (test cylinder) under the condition of constant heat flux. The testing fluid was air and the Reynolds number based on the major axis length (c) was ranged from 4,000 to 45,570. The tested longitudinal spacing ratio (Sx/c) and the transversal spacing ratio (Sy/b) were in the ranges of 1.5 ≤ Sx/c ≤ 4.0 and 1.5 ≤ Sy/b ≤ 4.0, respectively. The air flow pattern and temperature fields around the four staggered elliptic cylinders were predicted by using CFD software package. Also, a flow visualization study was made to show the flow features around the elliptic cylinders. It was observed that Num of the downstream elliptic cylinder in four staggered cylinders was higher than that of three in-line cylinders for all tested spacing ratios and Reynolds numbers except for Re = 4,000. It was clear that, at lower Reynolds number values (Re < 14,100), the average Nusselt number of the downstream elliptic cylinder in three staggered arrangement was higher than that of the downstream cylinder in four staggered arrangement for all tested spacing ratios. On the other hand, at Re > 14,100, the tested elliptic cylinder in four staggered arrangement had the higher values of the average Nusselt number. Moreover, in four staggered arrangement, the maximum average Nusselt number enhancement ratio (average Nusselt number of the tested downstream cylinder/average Nusselt number of a single elliptic cylinder) was found to be about 2.0, and was obtained for spacing ratios of Sx/c = 2.5, Sy/b = 2.5 and at Re = 32,000. Finally, the average Nusselt number of the tested cylinder in four staggered arrangement was correlated in terms of Reynolds number and cylinder spacing ratios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

b:

Minor axis length of elliptic cylinder (m)

c:

Major axis length of elliptic cylinder (m)

H:

Duct height (m)

h:

Local heat transfer coefficient (W/m2°C)

hm :

Average heat transfer coefficient to air stream (W/m2°C)

K:

Fluid thermal conductivity (W/m°C)

k:

Turbulent kinetic energy (m2/s2 or J/kg)

Nu:

Local Nusselt number

Num :

Average Nusselt number around the tested elliptic cylinder

Nus,m :

Average Nusselt number around a single elliptic cylinder

qw :

net heat flux (W/m2)

Re:

Reynolds number = Uo c/ν

Sx :

Longitudinal spacing distance (longitudinal distance between two cylinder centers) (m)

Sy :

Transversal spacing distance (transversal distance between the intermediate cylinders centers normal to the flow direction) (m)

s:

Circumferential distance from the leading edge, taken as positive along the upper side (m)

T:

Local surface temperature (°C)

To :

Average inlet air temperature (°C)

u:

Stream-wise velocity component (m/s)

Uo :

Upstream mean velocity (m/s)

v:

Transverse velocity component (m/s)

x:

Stream-wise coordinate (m)

y:

Normal coordinate (m)

ε:

Rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy (m2/s3)

α:

Angle of attack

ν:

Kinematic viscosity (m2/s)

μt :

Turbulent dynamic viscosity (N s/m2)

Φ:

Viscous dissipation term (W/m3)

ρ:

Density (kg/m3)

θ:

Non-dimensional temperature, θ = [(T − To)K]/(qwc)

b:

Bulk

o:

Upstream flow

s:

Single cylinder

w:

Wall

x:

Local distance in the axial direction

References

  1. Zukauskas AA (1942) Heat transfer from tubes in cross-flow. Adv Heat Transf 8:93–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan VT (1975) The overall convective heat transfer from smooth circular cylinders. Adv Heat Transf 11:199–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baughn JW, Elderkin MJ, Mckillop AA (1986) Heat transfer from a single cylinder, cylinders in tandem, and cylinders in the entrance region of a tube bank with a uniform heat flux. ASME J Heat Transf 108:386–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stanescu G, Fowler AJ, Bejan A (1996) The optimal spacing of cylinders in free-stream cross-flow forced convection. Int J Heat Mass Transf 39(2):311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bejan A, Fowler AJ, Stanescu G (1995) The optimal spacing between horizontal cylinders in a fixed volume cooled by natural convection. Int J Heat Mass Transf 38(11):2047–2055

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandhani VK, Chhabra RP, Eswaran V (2002) Forced convection heat transfer in tube banks in cross flow. Chem Eng Sci 57:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Afify RI, Berbish, NS (2003) Flow and heat transfer characteristics around a cylinder in three and four staggered cylinders in cross flow. Scientific Bulletin, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo, Egypt, vol. 38(2):853–872

  8. Chang BH, Mills AF (2004) Effect of aspect ratio on forced convection heat transfer from cylinders. Int. J Heat Mass Transf 47:1289–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanitjai S, Goldstein RJ (2004) Forced convection heat transfer from a circular cylinder in cross flow to air and liquids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47:4795–4805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bharti RP, Chhabra RP, Eswaran V (2007) Steady forced convection heat transfer from a heated circular cylinder to power-law fluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:977–990

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ota T, Nishiyama H, Taoka Y (1984) Heat transfer and flow around an elliptic cylinder. Int J Heat Mass Transf 27(10):1771–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nishiyama H, Ota T, Matsuno T (1986) Forced convection heat transfer from two elliptic cylinders in a tandem arrangement. Trans JSME 52:2677–2681

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nishiyama H, Ota T, Matsuno T (1988) Heat transfer and flow around elliptic cylinders in tandem arrangement. JSME Int J Series II 31(3):410–419

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ilgarubis V, Ulinskas R, Butkus A (1988) Hydraulic drag and average heat transfer coefficients of compact bundles of elliptical finned tubes. Heat Transf-Soviet Res 20:12–21

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jang JY, Yang JY (1998) Experimental and 3-D numerical analysis of the thermal-hydraulic characteristics of elliptic finned-tube heat exchangers. Heat Transf Eng 19(4):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bordalo SN, Saboya FEM (1999) Pressure drop coefficients for elliptic and circular sections in one, two and three-row arrangements of plate fin and tube heat exchangers. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Series XXI 4:600–610

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saboya SM, Saboya FEM (2001) Experiments on elliptic sections in one and two-row arrangements of plate fin and tube heat exchangers. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 24:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rocha LAO, Saboya FEM, Vargas JVC (1997) A comparative study of elliptical and circular sections in one and two-row tubes and plate fin heat exchangers. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 18:247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matos RS, Vargas JVC, Laursen TA, Saboya FEM (2001) Optimization study and heat transfer comparison of staggered circular and elliptic tubes in forced convection. Int J Heat Mass Transf 44:3953–3961

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Matos RS, Laursen TA, Vargas JVC, Bejan A (2004) Three- dimensional optimization of staggered finned circular and elliptic tubes in forced convection. Int J Therm Sci 43:477–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khan MG, Fartaj A, Ting DS-K (2004) An experimental characterization of cross-flow cooling of air via an in-line elliptical tube array. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 25:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abdel Aziz AA, Berbish NS, Hanafi AS (2006) Flow and heat transfer characteristics around a combination of elliptic cylinders in-line. Eighth International Congress of Fluid Dynamics and Propulsion, Shram El-Shiekh, Sinai, Egypt, ICFDP8-EG-166, Dec 14–17

  23. Abdel Aziz AA, Berbish NS, Hanafi AS (2007) Forced convection heat transfer and flow around three staggered elliptic cylinders in cross flow. Eng Res J, Helwan University, Faculty of Engineering, Mataria, Cairo, 109:M118–M136, Feb 2007

  24. Li Z, Davidson J, Mantell S (2005) Numerical simulation of flow field and heat transfer of streamlined cylinders in cross flow Proceedings of HT2005, 2005 ASME Summer Heat Transfer Conference, San Francisco, California, USA, 17–22 July 2005

  25. Mahir N, Altac Z (2008) Numerical investigation of convective heat transfer in unsteady flow past two cylinders in tandem arrangements. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 29:1309–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. ANSYS (2001) CFD FLOTRAN Analysis Guide. ANSYS, Inc., USA

  27. Churchill SW, Bernstein M (1977) A correlating equation for forced convection from gases and liquids to a circular cylinder in cross-flow. ASME J Heat Transf 99:300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabil S. Berbish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berbish, N.S. Heat transfer and flow behavior around four staggered elliptic cylinders in cross flow. Heat Mass Transfer 47, 287–300 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-010-0719-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-010-0719-y

Keywords

Navigation