Skip to main content
Log in

Learning to read upside-down: a study of perceptual expertise and its acquisition

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reading is an expert visual and ocular motor function, learned mainly in a single orientation. Characterizing the features of this expertise can be accomplished by contrasts between reading of normal and inverted text, in which perceptual but not linguistic factors are altered. Our goal was to examine this inversion effect in healthy subjects reading text, to derive behavioral and ocular motor markers of perceptual expertise in reading, and to study these parameters before and after training with inverted reading. Seven subjects engaged in a 10-week program of 30 half-hour sessions of reading inverted text. Before and after training, we assessed reading of upright and inverted single words for response time and word-length effects, as well as reading of paragraphs for time required, accuracy, and ocular motor parameters. Before training, inverted reading was characterized by long reading times and large word-length effects, with eye movements showing more and longer fixations, more and smaller forward saccades, and more regressive saccades. Training partially reversed many of these effects in single word and text reading, with the best gains occurring in reading aloud time and proportion of regressive saccades and the least change in forward saccade amplitude. We conclude that reading speed and ocular motor parameters can serve as markers of perceptual expertise during reading and that training with inverted text over 10 weeks results in significant gains of reading expertise in this unfamiliar orientation. This approach may be useful in the rehabilitation of patients with hemianopic dyslexia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aulhorn O (1948) Die lesegeschwindigkeit als funktion von buchstaben und zeilenlage. Pflugers Arch 250:12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen NJ, Squire LR (1980) Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science 210:207–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart M (1981) The MRC psycholinguistic database. Q J Exp Psychol 33:497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier L, Rayner K (1982) Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cogn Psychol 14:178–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishida T, Ikeda M (1989) Temporal properties of information extraction in reading studied by a text-mask replacement technique. J Opt Soc Am A 6:1624–1632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kao CH, Chen DY, Chen CC (2010) The inversion effect in visual word form processing. Cortex 46:217–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhoff G, Munssinger U, Haaf E, Eberle-Strauss G, Stogerer E (1992) Rehabilitation of homonymous scotomata in patients with postgeniculate damage of the visual system: saccadic compensation training. Restor Neurol Neurosci 4:245–254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolers PA (1968) The recognition of geometrically transformed text. Percept Psychophys 3:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolers PA (1975) Memorial consequences of automatized encoding. J Exp Psychol 1:689–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolers PA, Perkins DN (1975) Spatial and ordinal components of form perception and literacy. Cogn Psychol 7:228–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubrock J, Kliegl R, Engbert R (2006) SWIFT explorations of age differences in eye movements during reading. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:872–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leff AP, Spitsyna G, Plant GT, Wise RJ (2006) Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:1004–1007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lefton LA, Nagle RJ, Johnson G, Fisher DF (1979) Eye movements dynamics of good and poor readers. Then and now. J Read Behav 11:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Martelli M, Majaj NJ, Pelli DG (2005) Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. J Vis 5:58–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald SA, Spitsyna G, Shillcock RC, Wise RJ, Leff AP (2006) Patients with hemianopic alexia adopt an inefficient eye movement strategy when reading text. Brain 129:158–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou E, Hardiess G, Schaeffel F, Wiethoelter H, Karnath HO, Mallot H, Schoenfisch B, Schiefer U (2007) Assessment of vision-related quality of life in patients with homonymous visual field defects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:1749–1758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parks TE (1983) Optical illusions in invertions. Perception 12:88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollatsek A, Bolozky S, Well AD, Rayner K (1981) Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain Lang 14:174–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner K (1985) The role of eye movements in learning to read and reading disability. Remedial Spec Edu 6:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124:372–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner K, Duffy SA (1988) On-line comprehension processes and eye movements in reading. In: MacKinnon GE, Waller TG (eds) Reading research: advances in theory and practice. Academic Press, New York, pp 13–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner K, McConkie GW (1976) What guides a reader’s eye movements? Vision Res 16:829–837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner K, Binder KS, Ashby J, Pollatsek A (2001) Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Res 41:943–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle ED, Rayner K, Pollatsek A (2003) The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models. Behav Brain Sci 26:445–476 (discussion 477–526)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sankoh AJ, Huque MF, Dubey SD (1997) Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustments methods in clinical trials. Stat Med 16:2529–2542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuett S, Heywood CA, Kentridge RW, Zihl J (2008a) Rehabilitation of hemianopic dyslexia: are words necessary for re-learning oculomotor control? Brain 131:3156–3168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuett S, Heywood CA, Kentridge RW, Zihl J (2008b) The significance of visual information processing in reading: insights from hemianopic dyslexia. Neuropsychologia 46:2445–2462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon CA, Abegg M, Sekunova A, Barton JJS (2012) The word-length effect in acquired alexia, and real and virtual hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 50:841–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzyna GA, Wise RJ, McDonald SA, Plant GT, Kidd D, Crewes H, Leff AP (2007) Optokinetic therapy improves text reading in patients with hemianopic alexia: a controlled trial. Neurology 68:1922–1930

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SE (1965) Eye movements while reading: facts and fallacies. Am Edu Res J 2:187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson P (1980) Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion. Perception 9:483–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Dietz K (2012) Standardized assessment of reading performance: the New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:5452–5461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine T (1988) Upside-down Faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. Br J Psychol 79:471–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1969) Looking at upside-down faces. J Exp Psychol 81:141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

JB was supported by a Canada Research Chair and the Marianne Koerner Chair in Brain Diseases. Jayalakshmi Viswanathan assisted with programming the experiment. We thank Laura Eklinder Björnström for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason J. S. Barton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahlén, E., Hills, C.S., Hanif, H.M. et al. Learning to read upside-down: a study of perceptual expertise and its acquisition. Exp Brain Res 232, 1025–1036 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3813-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3813-9

Keywords

Navigation