Measurement of alcohol hangover severity: development of the Alcohol Hangover Severity Scale (AHSS)
- Renske PenningAffiliated withDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University
- , Adele McKinneyAffiliated withSchool of Psychology, University of Ulster
- , Lucien D. BusAffiliated withDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care, Groningen University
- , Berend OlivierAffiliated withDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University
- , Karin SlotAffiliated withDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University
- , Joris C. VersterAffiliated withDivision of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University Email author
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study aims to develop a new alcohol hangover symptom severity scale and compare its effectiveness with the Hangover Symptoms Scale (HSS), the Acute Hangover Scale (AHS), and a one-item hangover score.
Data from 1,410 Dutch students (Penning et al., Alcohol Alcohol 47:248-252, 2012) on the severity of 47 hangover symptoms were re-analyzed to develop the Alcohol Hangover Severity Scale (AHSS). The psychometric properties of the AHSS were compared with those of the HSS and the AHS. A survey among 1,000 students compared the AHSS and HSS with a one-item hangover severity score. The AHSS was further tested in a naturalistic hangover experiment.
The 12 items of the AHSS were fatigue, clumsiness, dizziness, apathy, sweating, shivering, nausea, heart pounding, confusion, stomach pain, concentration problems, and thirst. The Penning et al. (Alcohol Alcohol 47:248–252, 2012) data revealed that the predictive validity of the AHSS (92.4 %) for the overall hangover score was significantly higher than that of the HSS (81.5 %) and the AHS (71.0 %). The survey data (N = 966) showed that scores on the AHSS (39.7 %) and the HSS (47.6 %) only moderately predicted the one-item hangover score. A total of 119 subjects completed the naturalistic study. On average, they consumed 9.7 alcoholic consumptions, yielding a mean estimated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.16 %. During hangover, the AHSS score correlated significantly with the number of alcoholic consumptions (r = 0.38, p < 0.0001) and estimated BAC (r = 0.40, p < 0.0001).
The AHS, HSS, and AHSS all seem appropriate for application in hangover research. The use of a one-item hangover scale is not recommended.
KeywordsAlcohol Hangover Scale AHSS Questionnaire Measurement Severity Symptoms
- Measurement of alcohol hangover severity: development of the Alcohol Hangover Severity Scale (AHSS)
Volume 225, Issue 4 , pp 803-810
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- 2. School of Psychology, University of Ulster, Magee Campus, Derry, UK
- 3. Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care, Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands