Psychopharmacology

, Volume 222, Issue 2, pp 353–365

Behavioral inhibition in mice bred for high vs. low levels of methamphetamine consumption or sensitization

Authors

  • Travis M. Moschak
    • Department of Behavioral Neuroscience L470Oregon Health & Science University
  • Katherine A. Stang
    • Department of Behavioral Neuroscience L470Oregon Health & Science University
  • Tamara J. Phillips
    • Department of Behavioral Neuroscience L470Oregon Health & Science University
    • Methamphetamine Abuse Research CenterOregon Health & Science University
    • Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center
    • Department of Behavioral Neuroscience L470Oregon Health & Science University
    • Department of PsychiatryOregon Health & Science University
    • Methamphetamine Abuse Research CenterOregon Health & Science University
Original Investigation

DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2650-z

Cite this article as:
Moschak, T.M., Stang, K.A., Phillips, T.J. et al. Psychopharmacology (2012) 222: 353. doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2650-z

Abstract

Rationale

Research indicates that genetics influence methamphetamine self-administration as well as sensitization to the psychomotor-stimulating effects of methamphetamine (MA). Other studies have suggested that heightened levels of impulsivity, including low levels of behavioral inhibition, are associated with the use of drugs, including MA.

Objectives

The current study examined whether lines of mice selected for traits associated with a heightened risk of developing MA dependence would also exhibit low levels of drug-naïve inhibition and whether administration of MA would result in different levels of inhibition in animals selected to consume or respond more to MA.

Methods

A go/no-go task was used to assess inhibition in male and female mice selected for low or high levels of MA consumption or selected for high or low levels of locomotor sensitization to repeated injections of MA.

Results

Mice selected for MA sensitization differed in false alarms, precue response rates (measures of behavioral inhibition), and also hits (measure of operant responding). Mice selected for MA consumption did not differ in measures of behavioral inhibition, though hits differed. When MA was administered prior to the task, false alarms, precue response rates, and hits decreased for mice from all selected lines. Female high drinking mice were particularly resistant to MA’s effects on hits, but not precue response rate or false alarms.

Conclusions

These data suggest a shared, but complex, genetic association between inhibition processes, general levels of operant responding, and MA sensitization or consumption.

Keywords

InhibitionGo/no-goBehavioral sensitizationSelf-administrationSelected linesMethamphetamineImpulsivity

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012