Psychopharmacology

, Volume 217, Issue 2, pp 177–187

Single- and cross-commodity discounting among cocaine addicts: the commodity and its temporal location determine discounting rate

Authors

    • Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute and Department of Psychology Virginia Tech
  • Reid D. Landes
    • Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • Darren R. Christensen
    • Problem Gambling Research and Treatment CentreUniversity of Melbourne
  • Lisa Jackson
    • Department of Psychiatry, Center for Addiction ResearchUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • Bryan A. Jones
    • Department of Psychiatry, Center for Addiction ResearchUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • Zeb Kurth-Nelson
    • Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of Minnesota
  • A. David Redish
    • Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of Minnesota
Original Investigation

DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2272-x

Cite this article as:
Bickel, W.K., Landes, R.D., Christensen, D.R. et al. Psychopharmacology (2011) 217: 177. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2272-x

Abstract

Rationale

Intertemporal choice has provided important insights into understanding addiction, predicted drug-dependence status, and outcomes of treatment interventions. However, such analyses have largely been based on the choice of a single commodity available either immediately or later (e.g., money now vs. money later). In real life, important choices for those with addiction depend on making decisions across commodities, such as between drug and non-drug reinforcers. To date, no published study has systematically evaluated intertemporal choice using all combinations of a drug and a non-drug commodity.

Objectives

In this study, we examine the interaction between intertemporal choice and commodity type in the decision-making process of cocaine-dependent individuals.

Methods

This study of 47 treatment-seeking cocaine addicts analyzes intertemporal choices of two commodities (equated amounts of cocaine and money), specifically between cocaine now vs. cocaine later (C-C), money now vs. money later (M-M), cocaine now vs. money later (C-M), and money now vs. cocaine later (M-C).

Results

Cocaine addicts discounted significantly more in the C-C condition than in M-M (P = 0.032), consistent with previous reports. Importantly, the two cross-commodity discounting conditions produced different results. Discounting in C-M was intermediate to the C-C and M-M rates, while the greatest degree of discounting occurred in M-C.

Conclusions

These data indicate that the menu of commodities offered alter discounting rates in intertemporal choice and that the greatest rate is obtained when the drug is the later available commodity. Implications for understanding intertemporal choices and addiction are addressed.

Keywords

Addiction Cocaine Delay-discounting Behavioral economics Single-commodity discounting Cross-commodity discounting Competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011