Effects of galanin on cocaine-mediated conditioned place preference and ERK signaling in mice
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Narasimhaiah, R., Kamens, H.M. & Picciotto, M.R. Psychopharmacology (2009) 204: 95. doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1438-7
- 103 Views
The neuropeptide galanin and its receptors are expressed in brain regions implicated in the rewarding effects of natural stimuli and drugs of abuse. Galanin has been shown to attenuate neurochemical, physiological, and behavioral signs of opiate and amphetamine reinforcement.
In the current study, we present evidence that galanin modulates neurochemical and behavioral correlates of cocaine response.
Mice lacking the neuropeptide galanin (Gal −/−) and wild-type (Gal +/+) controls were used to analyze the effects of galanin in an unbiased conditioned place preference paradigm. We then examined cocaine-induced activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activity as a marker of intracellular signaling in the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway induced by acute cocaine administration
Gal −/− mice showed significantly greater conditioned place preference at a threshold dose of cocaine (3 mg/kg) than Gal +/+ mice, and this was reversed by administration of the galanin receptor agonist galnon. Consistent with the results of behavioral experiments, there was a significant increase in ERK activation in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) of Gal −/− mice but not Gal +/+ mice following acute, systemic cocaine injection at the threshold dose. In the NAc, but not VTA, this effect was reversed by administration of galnon.
These data, coupled with previous studies on the effects of morphine and amphetamine, demonstrate that galanin normally attenuates drug reinforcement, potentially via modulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system.
The neuropeptide galanin decreases behavioral and neurochemical responses to morphine and amphetamine in mice (Hawes et al. 2008; Kuteeva et al. 2005a,b; Zachariou et al. 1999, 2003). Central infusion of galanin in C57BL/6J mice attenuates morphine-induced place preference (Zachariou et al. 1999), whereas morphine conditioned place preference and locomotor activation are increased in galanin null mutant (Gal −/−) mice (Hawes et al. 2008). Furthermore, overexpression of galanin in noradrenergic neurons or administration of galnon can attenuate behavioral signs of opiate withdrawal, whereas Gal −/− mice show increased opiate withdrawal signs (Zachariou et al. 2003). In addition, transgenic mice that overexpress galanin throughout the brain are less sensitive to the locomotor stimulatory effects of an acute injection of amphetamine (Kuteeva et al. 2005a,b). These data suggest that galanin may be an endogenous protective factor against the progression to addiction.
The mesolimbic dopamine system is critical for the rewarding properties of drugs of abuse (Koob 1992). In addition, it is clear that the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway is induced by administration of a number of drugs of abuse (Berhow et al. 1996; Valjent et al. 2000, 2004, 2005). Blocking ERK activation has been shown to block the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse, including cocaine (Girault et al. 2007; Valjent et al. 2000). Galanin and its receptors (GalR1, GalR2, and GalR3) are expressed in the mesolimbic dopamine system as well as many other brain areas (Burgevin et al. 1995; Gustafson et al. 1996; Hawes and Picciotto 2004; Kolakowski et al. 1998; Waters and Krause 2000) and signaling through GalRs can modulate the activity of ERK in cultured neurons (Hawes et al. 2006a,b; Wittau et al. 2000) and in vivo (Elliott-Hunt et al. 2007; Hawes et al. 2008; Hobson et al. 2006). We have shown previously that mice lacking the gene encoding the galanin peptide exhibit higher levels of ERK activation in response to morphine in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), nucleus accumbens (NAc), and amygdala as compared to their wild-type (Gal +/+) controls (Hawes et al. 2008). Galanin can regulate release of classical neurotransmitters, including dopamine, acetylcholine, and glutamate in mesolimbic brain regions (Antoniou et al. 1997; Ellis and Davies 1994; Ogren et al. 1993; Tsuda et al. 1998). Thus galanin-mediated alterations in neurotransmitter release in the mesolimbic system may modulate behavioral and neurochemical responses to drugs of abuse.
In the current study, we wished to determine whether the ability of galanin to alter responses to drugs of abuse is restricted to opiates or whether galanin can also modulate the rewarding effects of cocaine. We therefore investigated whether cocaine-mediated place preference (CPP) or induction of ERK signaling was altered in mice lacking the neuropeptide galanin and whether this could be reversed by administration of the small molecule galanin receptor agonist galnon. We hypothesized that mice lacking galanin would be more sensitive to cocaine CPP and would show enhanced ERK activation in the mesolimbic circuit compared to Gal +/+ mice.
Materials and methods
Galanin wild-type (Gal +/+) and null mutant (Gal −/−) mice on the 129/OlaHsd background (Wynick et al. 1998) were used for all experiments. All mice were housed two to five per cage of the same genotype in standard plastic mouse cages (Allentown Inc, Allentown, NJ, USA). Mice had ad libitum access to rodent chow (Harlan Teklad #2018) and water. The female mice used in these studies were generated by crossing homozygous Gal +/+ or Gal −/− mice derived from Gal +/− matings. In a small pilot study we found that mice bred from heterozygous breeding pairs did not differ in their behavior from mice derived from Gal +/+ or Gal −/− matings (not shown). All mice were 6–8 months old and experimentally naïve at the start of testing. All animal studies were conducted in accordance with guidelines from the National Institutes of Health and approved by the Yale Animal Care and Use Committee.
Galnon, a small molecule, non-peptide galanin receptor agonist that has the ability to cross the blood brain barrier (Saar et al. 2002), was purchased from Bachem (Torrance, CA, USA). Cocaine was obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Baltimore, MD, USA).
Cocaine place preference
Gal −/− and Gal +/+ mice were transported to the facility where behavioral training would take place at least 2 weeks prior to behavioral testing and were habituated to experimenter handling for a minimum of 3 days. Med Associates CPP boxes (ENV-256C Med Associates Inc, St. Albans, VT, USA) were modified for a non-biased CPP procedure. Two conditioning chambers with retractable doors were separated by a grey neutral chamber with a grey Plexiglas floor. One conditioning chamber had a wire mesh floor. The second conditioning chamber had a grid floor. The location of each animal was recorded by photocell beam breaks and time spent in each chamber was calculated using Med-PC IV software.
Mice were transferred to the testing room at least 30 min prior to behavioral testing to allow mice to acclimate to the testing room. The methods used to assess unbiased cocaine CPP were similar to those that our lab used to assess morphine CPP in these animals (Hawes et al. 2008). Subjects were injected with saline or cocaine (3 or 10 mg/kg, doses chosen to be below and above the threshold for cocaine CPP in wild-type mice based on pilot testing in our laboratory) just prior to placement into the CPP apparatus. To assess baseline preference, mice were injected with saline and placed inside the neutral chamber and allowed to explore both conditioning chambers for 15 min. During the conditioning phase of the experiment, mice received two conditioning sessions per day for three consecutive days. During the AM session (beginning at approximately 1000 h), mice were isolated in one conditioning chamber for 30 min following vehicle injection. During the PM session (beginning at approximately 1400 h) animals were isolated in the opposite conditioning chamber following an injection of cocaine. Animals were counterbalanced for drug-paired chamber according to genotype and baseline preference. On the day after completing the conditioning sessions, animals were tested for their preference of the two conditioning chambers. The baseline and test sessions took place at an intermediate time between the AM and PM training sessions (approximately 1200 h). Total time spent in each conditioning chamber during the baseline and test sessions was observed. Cocaine CPP was measured as the amount of time spent in the drug-paired chamber on the test day relative to the amount of time spent in the drug-paired chamber during the baseline session for each individual animal.
To rule out developmental changes in Gal −/− mice, both Gal +/+ and Gal −/− mice were administered saline or 2 mg/kg galnon, a small molecule galanin receptor agonist, 15 min before receiving a saline or cocaine injection at a threshold dose (3 mg/kg).
Given the a priori hypothesis based on our prior work with morphine (Hawes et al. 2008) that the Gal −/− mice would be more sensitive to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine, data from the CPP experiments were analyzed using one-tailed t tests. To determine if there was a statistically significant place preference within each genotype we analyzed data from each genotype using a single-sample t test tested against a mean of zero. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
Western blot analysis
Gal −/− and Gal +/+ mice were either administered i.p. injections of saline or 2 mg/kg galnon 15 min prior to an injection of saline or 3 mg/kg cocaine. Five minutes after injection, brains were harvested by rapid decapitation and tissue punches of VTA and NAc were isolated and immediately frozen on dry ice. These times were chosen based on our prior studies examining the effects of morphine on ERK phosphorylation in these mice (Hawes et al. 2008) as well as studies that have examined phosphorylated ERK (P-ERK) following cocaine administration (Valjent et al. 2000). To assess levels of P-ERK, western blots were performed following standard procedures (Hawes et al. 2008). Briefly, cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% SDS, and 1 mM PMSF) was added to the frozen tissue punches and immediately pulse sonicated for 5 s. Lowry reagents (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were used to determine protein concentrations according to manufacturer’s instructions. For P-ERK and ERK immunoblots, 10 µg of protein for each sample was separated on 10% poly-acrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Blots were blocked in 5% Milk/Tris-buffered saline Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 h, washed with TBST, and incubated overnight in primary antibody diluted in TBST. Polyclonal antisera specific for p42/p44-MAPK (ERK1/2) and the phosphorylated form of ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling, Beverley, MA, USA) were used at a dilution of 1:1,000 for both antibodies. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) immunoreactivity was used as an internal standard to control for protein loading. Blots were incubated for 30 min at room temperature in anti-GAPDH monoclonal primary antibody (Advanced ImmunoChemical Inc., Long Beach, CA, USA) diluted 1:5,000 in TBST following the overnight incubation with a cocktail of the P-ERK and ERK antibodies. After washing three times for 5 min with TBST, blots were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were incubated in IR Dye 800 conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Rockland Inc., Gilbertsville, PA, USA) and Alexa fluor 680 conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Bands were visualized and quantified using the LI-COR Odyssey imager (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) with Odyssey imaging software. Levels of protein phosphorylation were determined by calculating the ratio of phosphorylated band intensity to total protein band intensity. Data were normalized to the Gal +/+ saline group to allow comparison across multiple blots by dividing each value by the average of the Gal +/+ saline group and multiplying by 100. Data were analyzed using a 3-way ANOVA (genotype × pretreatment × challenge) followed by the Newman–Keuls post hoc test. An alpha <0.05 was considered to be significant.
Effects of galanin on neurochemical changes in response to cocaine
Drugs of abuse have different primary molecular targets in the brain, but converge to increase levels of extracellular dopamine in the NAc (Di Chiara and Imperato 1988). Acute administration of the psychostimulant cocaine induces long-lasting electrophysiological, neurochemical, and behavioral changes (Saal et al. 2003; Ungless et al. 2001; Valjent et al. 2001, 2004, 2005; Vanderschuren et al. 1999). In the current study, we demonstrate that knockout of the neuropeptide galanin increases susceptibility to cocaine place preference and enhances cocaine-mediated ERK activation in the mesolimbic system. The increased sensitivity to place preference is reduced by administration of the small molecule galanin receptor agonist galnon. Prior studies have shown that galanin normally reduces morphine place preference and signs of morphine withdrawal as well as amphetamine-induced locomotor activity (Hawes et al. 2008; Kuteeva et al. 2005a,b; Zachariou et al. 1999, 2003). Taken together, these studies suggest that galanin decreases the rewarding effects of different classes of abused drugs, likely through effects on the mesolimbic dopamine pathway.
While it has been shown that galanin can attenuate responses to morphine and amphetamine (Hawes et al. 2008; Kuteeva et al. 2005a,b; Zachariou et al. 1999, 2003), there is accumulating data that galanin increases ethanol intake (Lewis et al. 2005; Rada et al. 2004; Schneider et al. 2007). Additionally, polymorphisms in the galanin and GalR3 genes have been associated with alcoholism (Belfer et al. 2006, 2007). We speculate that this effect of galanin may be due to alcohol’s caloric content (Picciotto 2008) since galanin can increase food intake. It would be interesting to see if galanin modulates the conditioned rewarding effects of ethanol. It is possible that galanin would influence this behavior differently from alcohol consumption because it occurs in the absence of the caloric confound.
Galanin binds with similar affinity to all three known G-protein coupled receptors (GalR1, GalR2, and GalR3). While GalR1 and GalR2 are widely expressed in the brain, there is a lower level of expression of GalR3 (Lang et al. 2007). Activation of GalR2 can increase activity of ERK as measured by a change in P-ERK in the absence of a change in total ERK, likely through activation of PKC (Elliott-Hunt et al. 2007; Hawes et al. 2006a; Zubrzycka and Janecka 2008). In contrast, activation of GalR1 decreases adenylate cyclase, cAMP, PKA, and CREB activation (Hawes et al. 2005, 2006a; Lang et al. 2007). Since cocaine exposure results in increases in P-ERK but not total ERK in the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway (Valjent et al. 2001, 2005) and inhibition of ERK activation prevents behavioral changes mediated by cocaine (Valjent et al. 2006), it seems possible that the increase in cocaine-mediated ERK activation in Gal −/− mice could be due to loss of GalR1 signaling in dopamine-responsive neurons. A decrease in GalR1 signaling would be expected to attenuate cAMP levels, resulting in a concomitant decrease in ERK activation (Vossler et al. 1997).
In the current study, galnon normalized P-ERK levels in the NAc, but not VTA, following treatment with 3 mg/kg cocaine in Gal −/− mice. These results are similar to those observed with morphine (Hawes et al. 2008). An acute injection of galnon completely reversed the activation of ERK in the nucleus accumbens, but only partially reversed this effect in the VTA (Hawes et al. 2008). Similar to the current study, there were differences in P-ERK, not total ERK, levels in Gal −/− mice following morphine administration (Hawes et al. 2008). Galnon appears to be a somewhat more selective agonist of GalR1 compared to GalR2 or GalR3 (Saar et al. 2002; Wu et al. 2003). It is possible that regional differences in GalR1 expression may account for differences in galnon’s ability to reverse the P-ERK in the NAc, but not VTA. Alternatively, the difference in P-ERK levels in the VTA may be due to developmental alterations in this brain area in galanin knockout mice that are not reversible in adulthood. That is, the lack of galanin throughout development may increase the sensitivity of VTA neurons to a cocaine challenge through changes in neuronal excitability that are not sensitive to modulation by acute injection of a galanin receptor agonist.
One mechanism that could explain the ability of galanin to decrease sensitivity to the behavioral effects of drugs of abuse is its ability to modulate dopamine release. Galanin can decrease dopamine release in striatal slices (Tsuda et al. 1998). Endogenous galanin or exogenous galnon may thus attenuate dopamine release, leading to decreased effects of cocaine. This could be due to a direct effect of galanin on dopamine terminals or an indirect effect through modulation of other neurotransmitter systems in the mesolimbic circuit.
Galanin regulates the release of a number of neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine, glutamate, serotonin, and norepinephrine, in addition to dopamine (Kinney et al. 1998; Ogren et al. 1998; Pieribone et al. 1995; Tsuda et al. 1998; Wang et al. 1999). The effect of galanin on these neurotransmitters has, in most cases, been studied in the hippocampus. In brain regions known to be important in the rewarding effect of drugs of abuse less is known. Galanin can decrease striatal acetylcholine levels in microdialysis studies in awake rats (Antoniou et al. 1997); although in the same brain region it can increase acetylcholine release in anesthetized rats (Antoniou et al. 1997; Ogren et al. 1993), suggesting that this effect is modulated by arousal. Furthermore, galanin also decreases glutamate, but not GABA, release in striatal slices (Ellis and Davies 1994). These data suggest that galanin normally decreases acetylcholine and glutamate release in the striatum. While little data are available on the effects of galanin on the VTA, it is plausible that similar effects occur in this brain area. For example, local infusion of galanin into the VTA but not the NAc modulates dopamine synthesis (Ericson and Ahlenius 1999). Therefore, effects on neurons in the VTA and/or the NAc may be responsible for the effects of galanin in the mesolimbic system. Galanin can also modulate anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in mice (for review see Holmes and Picciotto 2006) and alterations in emotionality could also affect responses to drugs of abuse, perhaps through other neurotransmitter systems that converge on the mesolimbic system, including those involving norepinephrine or serotonin.
The increased cocaine preference seen in Gal −/− mice, and the ability of the galanin receptor agonist galnon to decrease cocaine CPP in those mice, make galanin and galanin receptors promising candidates for the development of novel therapeutics for preventing progression from drug exposure to drug abuse. The current findings, in combination with previous data showing that galanin modulates responses to morphine and amphetamine (Hawes et al. 2008; Kuteeva et al. 2005a,b; Zachariou et al. 1999, 2003), demonstrate that galanin modulates responses to drugs of abuse of different classes. It is therefore possible that genetic polymorphisms in galanin and its receptors could result in altered susceptibility to drug abuse. A recent study has found an association with a SNP found in the galanin gene and heroin addiction (Levran et al. 2008). It will be interesting to determine whether genes in the galanin pathway contribute to the development of psychostimulant abuse in future candidate gene studies.
This work was supported by grants DA15425 and DA00436 from the National Institutes of Health.