Abstract
Rationale
Imaginative suggestibility, a trait closely related to hypnotic suggestibility, is modifiable under some circumstances. Nitrous oxide (laughing gas) is commonly used for sedation in dentistry and is reported to be more effective when combined with appropriate suggestions.
Objective
The aim of this study was to determine whether nitrous oxide inhalation alters imaginative suggestibility and imagery vividness.
Methods
Thirty participants were tested twice in a within-subjects design, once during inhalation of 25% nitrous oxide and once during inhalation of air plus oxygen. Before the study, participants’ expectancies regarding the effects of nitrous oxide were assessed. Participants were blinded to drug administration. During each session, participants were verbally administered detailed measures of imagination and suggestibility: the Sheehan–Betts Quality of Mental Imagery scale and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale Form C, minus the hypnotic induction.
Results
Imaginative suggestibility and imaginative ability (imagery vividness) were both elevated in the nitrous oxide condition. This effect was unrelated to participants’ expectations regarding the effects of the drug.
Conclusions
Nitrous oxide increased imaginative suggestibility and imaginative ability. Possible explanations of these findings are discussed with respect to the effects of N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonists and to other pharmacological effects upon suggestibility and imagination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen WA (1972) Relative analgesia: an introductory note. Br Dent J 133:25–26
Barber J, Donaldson D, Ramras S, Allen GD (1979) The relationship between nitrous oxide conscious sedation and the hypnotic state. J Am Dent Assoc 99(4):624–626
Benham G, Bowers S, Nash M, Muenchen R (1998) Self-fulfilling prophecy and hypnotic response are not the same thing. J Pers Soc Psychol 75:1604–1613. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1604
Bertrand LD (1989) The assessment and modification of hypnotic susceptibility. In: Spanos NP, Chaves JF (eds) Hypnosis: the cognitive–behavioral perspective. Prometheus Books, Buffalo (NY), pp 18–31
Betts GH (1909) The distribution and functions of mental imagery. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York
Bingham GD (1964) Rapid hypnosis by using nitrous oxide. Am J Clin Hypn 7:226–228
Brown RJ, Oakley DA (2004) An integrative cognitive theory of hypnosis and high hypnotisability. In: Heap M, Brown RJ, Oakley DA (eds) The highly hypnotizable person. Routledge, London, pp 152–186
Cass N, Cass L (1994) Pharmacology for anaesthetists. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Crawford HJ (1982) Hypnotizability, daydreaming styles, imagery vividness, and absorption: a multidimensional study. J Pers Soc Psychol 42:915–926
de Groh M (1989) Correlates of hypnotic susceptibility. In: Spanos NP, Chaves JF (eds) Hypnosis: the cognitive–behavioural perspective. Prometheus, Buffalo, NY, pp 32–63
Derbyshire SWG, Whalley MG, Stenger VA, Oakley DA (2004) Cerebral activation during hypnotically induced and imagined pain. Neuroimage 23:392–401. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.033
Dienes Z, Perner J (2007) Executive control without conscious awareness: the cold control theory of hypnosis. In: Jamieson GA (ed) Hypnosis and conscious states. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Eysenck HJ, Rees WL (1945) States of heightened suggestibility: narcosis. J Ment Sci 91:301–310
Faymonville ME, Mambourg PH, Joris J, Vrijens B, Fissette J, Albert A, Lamy M (1997) Psychological approaches during conscious sedation. Hypnosis versus stress reducing strategies: a prospective randomized study. Pain 73:361–367. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00122-X
Franks NP, Lieb WR (1998) A serious target for laughing gas. Nat Med 4(4):383–384. doi:10.1038/nm0498-383
Gandhi B, Oakley DA (2005) Does ‘hypnosis’ by any other name smell as sweet? The efficacy of ‘hypnotic’ inductions depends on the label ‘hypnosis’. Conscious Cogn 14:304–315. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.12.004
Gibson HB, Corcoran ME, Curran JD (1977) Hypnotic susceptibility and personality: the consequences of diazepam and the sex of the subjects. Br J Psychol 68:51–59
Glisky ML, Tataryn DJ, Kihlstrom JF (1995) Hypnotizability and mental imagery. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 43:34–54
Gorasini DR (2004) Enhancing hypotisability. In: Heap M, Brown RJ, Oakley DA (eds) The highly hypnotizable person. Routledge, London, pp 213–239
Gorassini DR, Spanos NP (1989) The Carleton Skill Training Programme for modifying hypnotic suggestibility: original version and variations. In: Kirsch I, Capafons A, Amigó S, Cardeña-Buelna E (eds) Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation therapy: a cognitive–behavioural perspective. American Psychological Association Books, Washington, DC, pp 141–77
Hilgard ER (1986) Divided consciousness: multiple controls in human thought and action (expanded edition). Wiley, New York
Hilgard ER, Hilgard JR (1975) Hypnosis in the relief of pain. Brunner/Mazel, Levittown, PA
Holmes EA, Matthews A (2005) Mental imagery and emotion: a special relationship? Emotion 5:489–497. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.489
Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Todorovic SM, Mennerick S, Powell S, Dikranian K, Benshoff N, Zorumski CF, Olney JW (1998) Nitrous oxide (laughing gas) is an NMDA antagonist, neuroprotectant and neurotoxin. Nat Med 4:460–463. doi:10.1038/nm0498-460
Kelly SF, Fisher S, Kelly RJ (1978) Effects of cannabis intoxication on primary suggestibility. Psychopharmacology 56:217–219
Kihlstrom JF (2007) Modified version of the SHSS:C. Retrieved September 30th, 2008, from http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrm/PDFfiles/Hypnotizability/SHSSC%20Script.pdf
Kirsch I (1985) Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behaviour. Am Psychol 40:1189–1202
Kirsch I, Braffman W (2001) Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 10(2):57–61. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00115
Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL, Constantini-Ferrando MF, Alpert NM, Speigel D (2000) Hypnotic visual illusion alters color processing in the brain. Am J Psychiatr 157:1279–1284. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1279
Kosslyn SM, Ganis G, Thompson WL (2001) Neural foundations of imagery. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:635–642
Lippe HT (1944) Nitrous oxide analgesia in cavity preparation. Temple Dental Review 14:7
McAvine LP, Robertson IH (2006-2007) Measuring visual imagery ability: a review. Imagin Cogn Pers 26:191–211. doi:10.2190/3515-8169-24J8-7157
Morgan CJA, Mofeez A, Brandner B, Bromley L, Curren HV (2004) Acute effects of ketamine on memory systems and psychotic symptoms in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:208–218. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300342
Orne MT (1962) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Am Psychol 17(11):776–783
Ott U (2007) States of absorption: in search of neurobiological foundations. In: Jamieson GA (ed) Hypnosis and conscious states. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Pekala RJ, Kumar VK (2007) An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: with particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. In: Jamieson GA (ed) Hypnosis and conscious states. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Perry C, Nadon R, Button J (1992) The measurement of hypnotic ability. In: Fromm E, Nash M (eds) Contemporary hypnosis research. Guilford, New York, pp 459–490
Seladin HM (1947) Practical anesthesia for dentistry and oral surgery. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia
Sheehan PW (1967) A shortened form of Betts’ questionnaire upon mental imagery. J Clin Psychol 23:386–389
Shor RE, Orne EC (1962) Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Form A. Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, California
Simons D, Potter C, Temple G (2007) Hypnosis and communication in dental practice. Quintessence, London
Sjoberg BM, Hollister LE (1965) The effects of psychomimetic drugs on primary suggestibility. Psychopharmacology 8:251–262
Spanos NP (1986) Hypnosis and the modification of hypnotic susceptibility: a social psychological perspective. In: Naish P (ed) What is hypnosis? Open University Press, Philadelphia, pp 85–120
Sutcliffe JP, Perry CW, Sheehan PW (1970) Relation of some aspects of imagery and fantasy to hypnotic susceptibility. J Abnorm Psychology 76:279–287
Szechtman H, Woody E, Bowers K, Nahmias C (1998) Where the imaginal appears real: a positron emission tomography study of auditory hallucinations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1956–1960. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.4.1956
Vickery AR, Kirsch I (1991) The effects of brief expectancy manipulations on hypnotic responsiveness. Contemp Hypn 8:167–171
Wagman R, Stewart CG (1974) Visual imagery and hypnotic susceptibility. Percept Mot Skills 38:815–822
Walker DJ, Zacny JP (2005) Subjective effects of nitrous oxide. In: Earlywine M (ed) Mind-altering drugs: the science of subjective experience. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER (1959) Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, Forms A and B. Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CA
Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER (1962) Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, Form C. Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CA
Weitzenhoffer AM, Sjoberg BM (1961) Suggestibility with and without ‘induction of hypnosis’. J Nerv Ment Dis 132:204–220
Westcott TB, Rosenstock E (1976) Reliability of two measures of imagery. Percept Mot Skills 42:1037–1038
White K, Ashton R, Law H (1974) Factor analyses of the shortened form of Betts’ Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery. Aust J Psychol 26:183–190
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank David Oakley, Irving Kirsch, and Celia Morgan for their helpful comments during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whalley, M.G., Brooks, G.B. Enhancement of suggestibility and imaginative ability with nitrous oxide. Psychopharmacology 203, 745–752 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1424-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1424-0