, Volume 174, Issue 3, pp 341-357
Date: 19 Feb 2004

The role of dopamine D3 compared with D2 receptors in the control of locomotor activity: a combined behavioural and neurochemical analysis with novel, selective antagonists in rats

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

Background

The role of dopamine D3/D2 receptors in the control of locomotion is poorly understood.

Objectives

To examine the influence of selective antagonists at D3 or D2 receptors on locomotion in rats, alone and in interaction with the preferential D3 versus D2 receptor agonist, PD128,907.

Methods

Affinities of ligands at rat D2 and cloned, human hD3, hD2S, hD2L and hD4 sites were determined by standard procedures. Locomotion was monitored automatically in rats pre-habituated for 30 min to an open-field environment. Extracellular levels of dopamine (DA) were determined by dialysis in the nucleus accumbens and striatum. Drugs were given acutely via the systemic route.

Results

PD128,907, which preferentially recognised D3 versus D2 sites, biphasically reduced and enhanced locomotion at “low” (0.01–0.63 mg/kg) and “high” (2.5–10 mg/kg) doses, respectively. L741,626 and S23199, which behaved as preferential D2 versus D3 receptor antagonists, enhanced the reduction in locomotion evoked by the low dose of PD128,907, blocked the increase provoked by the high dose and suppressed spontaneous locomotion alone. Analogous findings were obtained with haloperidol and raclopride which showed equilibrated affinity at D2 and D3 receptors. UH232 and AJ76, which showed a mild preference for D3 versus D2 sites, did not modify the effect of a low dose of PD128,907, slightly enhanced the hyperlocomotion elicited by the high dose and exerted little influence on locomotion alone. S14297 and U99194, which acted as preferential D3 versus D2 receptor antagonists, abolished the reduction in locomotion elicited by a low dose of PD128,907, potentiated the induction of locomotion by a high dose, and failed to influence locomotion alone. The actions of S14297 were stereoselective inasmuch as they were mimicked by the racemic form, S11566, but not by the inactive enantiomer, S17777. In contrast to S14297, S11566 and U99194, however, S33084, SB269,652, GR218,231 and N-[-4-[’-(1-naphtyl)piperazine-1-yl]butyl] anthracene-2-carboxamide (“NGB-1”), highly selective D3 versus D2 receptor antagonists, were inactive under all conditions. PD128,907 (0.01–10.0 mg/kg) suppressed dialysate levels of DA in the nucleus accumbens and striatum, actions blocked by L741,626 and haloperidol, yet unaffected by S14297 and S33084.

Conclusions

The facilitatory influence of a “high” dose of PD128,907 upon locomotion is mediated by postsynaptic D2 receptors and, possibly, countered by their D3 counterparts. Correspondingly, selective blockade of D2 but not of D3 receptors alone suppresses motor function. The reduction in locomotion provoked by a “low” dose of PD128,907 may be mediated by D2 autoreceptors, but a role of postsynaptic D3 receptors cannot be excluded. Finally, mechanisms underlying the contrasting influence of chemically diverse D3 receptor antagonists upon locomotion remain to be elucidated.