Mathematische Zeitschrift

, Volume 263, Issue 2, pp 235–264

Nearly tight frames and space-frequency analysis on compact manifolds


DOI: 10.1007/s00209-008-0406-6

Cite this article as:
Geller, D. & Mayeli, A. Math. Z. (2009) 263: 235. doi:10.1007/s00209-008-0406-6


Let M be a smooth compact oriented Riemannian manifold of dimension n without boundary, and let Δ be the Laplace–Beltrami operator on M. Say \({0 \neq f \in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb R^+)}\) , and that f (0)  =  0. For t  >  0, let Kt(x, y) denote the kernel of f (t2 Δ). Suppose f satisfies Daubechies’ criterion, and b  >  0. For each j, write M as a disjoint union of measurable sets Ej,k with diameter at most baj, and measure comparable to \({(ba^j)^n}\) if baj is sufficiently small. Take xj,kEj,k. We then show that the functions \({\phi_{j,k}(x)=\mu(E_{j,k})^{1/2} \overline{K_{a^j}}(x_{j,k},x)}\) form a frame for (I  −  P)L2(M), for b sufficiently small (here P is the projection onto the constant functions). Moreover, we show that the ratio of the frame bounds approaches 1 nearly quadratically as the dilation parameter approaches 1, so that the frame quickly becomes nearly tight (for b sufficiently small). Moreover, based upon how well-localized a function F ∈ (I  −  P)L2 is in space and in frequency, we can describe which terms in the summation \({F \sim SF = \sum_j \sum_k \langle F,\phi_{j,k} \rangle \phi_{j,k}}\) are so small that they can be neglected. If n  =  2 and M is the torus or the sphere, and f (s)  =  ses (the “Mexican hat” situation), we obtain two explicit approximate formulas for the φj,k, one to be used when t is large, and one to be used when t is small.


FramesWaveletsContinuous waveletsSpectral theorySchwartz functionsTime–frequency analysisManifoldsSphereTorusPseudodifferential operators

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)


Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA