Osteoporosis International

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 1767–1767

Vitamin D and atypical femoral fractures

Letter

DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2219-z

Cite this article as:
Ng, A.C., Koh, J.SB. & Howe, TS. Osteoporos Int (2013) 24: 1767. doi:10.1007/s00198-012-2219-z
  • 759 Downloads

Dear Editors,

There have been recent reports of atypical femoral fractures occurring in patients treated with bisphosphonates [1]. While the primary hypothesis has centered on the oversuppression of bone turnover, there have been suggestions that vitamin D deficiency might also be an important risk factor [1, 2]. Thus far, only one series has examined the association between vitamin D levels and atypical femoral fractures [2]. In the study by Girgis et al., serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) of less than 16 ng/mL was associated with an increased the risk of atypical subtrochanteric fractures (OR = 3.2). While it is plausible that vitamin D deficiency may play a role in the pathogenesis of these fractures since it is associated with impaired calcium absorption, compensatory hyperparathyroidism, and increased bone resorption, it was not an evident risk factor in our clinical experience. In our case series, which was one of the first published series describing this phenomenon [3], there were 16 women, age 52 to 91 years and of Asian ethnicity, who had a serum 25OHD level ascertained at the time of presentation between May 2004 and March 2010. They were compared to age-, ethnicity-, and sex-matched controls with low-energy osteoporotic femoral neck or pertrochanteric fractures admitted during the same period of time. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as 25OHD <20 ng/mL. Baseline characteristics were similar between cases and controls. The median 25OHD was 26.2 ng/mL in cases vs 19.0 ng/mL in controls (p = 0.0127), consistent with a greater use of calcium (81.3 vs 37.5 %, p = 0.004) and vitamin D (68.8 vs 34.4 %, p = 0.024) supplementation in cases vs. controls. Only 3 out of 16 cases (18.75 %) were vitamin D deficient, while 17 out of 32 controls (53.13 %) were vitamin D deficient (p = 0.031). The odds ratio for vitamin D deficiency in cases vs controls was 0.20 (95 % CI 0.03, 0.97). The main limitation of this analysis was the measurement of 25OHD at the time of presentation rather than at the initiation of and during bisphosphonate therapy. Nevertheless, our study indicated that vitamin D status was significantly better in cases vs controls at the time of fracture, suggesting that vitamin D status might be a less important factor than previously thought in the development of bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fractures.

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EndocrinologySingapore General HospitalSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgerySingapore General HospitalSingaporeSingapore