Utility of automated data in identifying femoral shaft and subtrochanteric (diaphyseal) fractures
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In women age 45 years and older, enrolled in an integrated group practice in 2007, use of ICD9 diagnostic codes, including the “not otherwise specified” code (821.00) resulted in a high false-positive rate for identifying femoral diaphyseal fractures. Restriction to more specific site-codes missed 36% of these rare fractures.
The aim of this study was to assess the utility of automated data in identifying the occurrence of femoral diaphyseal fractures.
We identified all women age 45 years and older enrolled in a Pacific Northwest integrated group practice during 2007. Using the computerized database we selected all ICD9 codes that could be related to a femur fracture occurring in the diaphyseal region. We then quantified the percent of codes confirmed by medical record review to have occurred in the correct anatomic location during the year of interest (positive predictive value).
Of the 95,765 eligible women, 161 (0.17%) had an ICD9 diagnostic code potentially related to a femoral diaphyseal fracture in 2007; of these 58 (36%) had a fracture of the femoral diaphysis, and 38 (24%) of the fractures occurred in 2007. The most frequent code was 821.00, described as “femur fracture not otherwise specified”, applied to 107 women; 21 of the 58 diaphyseal fractures had this code.
In this study, use of ICD9 codes that included the “not otherwise specified” code (821.00) resulted in a high false-positive rate for identifying diaphyseal fractures. However, restriction to more specific site codes would have missed at least 36% of the diaphyseal fractures. Furthermore, the codes did not provide any information about the characteristics of the fracture. Our findings support validating cases selected using ICD codes before they are used as a surrogate for the occurrence of femoral diaphyseal fractures.
- FDA USFDA (2010) FDA Drug Safety Communication: Ongoing safety review of oral bisphosphonates and atypical subtrochanteric femur fractures. Silver Spring, MD
- Black DM, Kelly MP, Genant HK, Palermo L, Eastell R, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Cauley J, Leung PC, Boonen S, Santora A, de Papp A, Bauer DC, The Fracture Intervention T, Committees HPFTS (2010) Bisphosphonates and fractures of the subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femur. N Engl J Med. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1001086
- Ray WA, Griffin MR, Fought RL, Adams ML (1992) Identification of fractures from computerized Medicare files. J Clin Epidemiol 45:703–714. CrossRef
- Neviaser AS, Lane JM, Lenart BA, Edobor-Osula F, Lorich DG (2008) Low-energy femoral shaft fractures associated with alendronate use. J Orthop Trauma 22:346–350. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318172841c CrossRef
- De Das S, Setiobudi T, Shen L (2010) A rational approach to management of alendronate-related subtrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:679–686. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B5.22941 CrossRef
- Girgis CM, Sher D, Seibel MJ (2010) Atypical femoral fractures and bisphosphonate use. N Engl J Med 362:1848–1849. doi:10.1056/NEJMc0910389 CrossRef
- Lenart BA, Neviaser AS, Lyman S, Chang CC, Edobor-Osula F, Steele B, van der Meulen MC, Lorich DG, Lane JM (2008) Association of low-energy femoral fractures with prolonged bisphosphonate use: a case control study. Osteoporos Int. doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0805-x
- Abrahamsen B, Eiken P, Eastell R (2008) Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur fractures in patients treated with alendronate: a register-based national cohort study. J Bone Miner Res. doi:10.1359/jbmr.081247
- Nieves JW, Bilezikian JP, Lane JM, Einhorn TA, Wang Y, Steinbuch M, Cosman F (2009) Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics. Osteoporos Int. doi:10.1007/s00198-009-0962-6
- Evans JG (1979) Fractured proximal femur in Newcastle upon Tyne. Age Ageing 8:16–24 CrossRef
- Fisher ES, Whaley FS, Krushat WM, Malenka DJ, Fleming C, Baron JA, Hsia DC (1992) The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain. Am J Public Health 82:243–248 CrossRef
- Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Seeley DG, Cauley JA, Vogt TM, Black DM (1992) The accuracy of self-report of fractures in elderly women: evidence from a prospective study. Am J Epidemiol 135:490–499
- Ismail AA, O'Neill TW, Cockerill W, Finn JD, Cannata JB, Hoszowski K, Johnell O, Matthis C, Raspe H, Raspe A, Reeve J, Silman AJ (2000) Validity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. EPOS Study Group. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int 11:248–254 CrossRef
- Hundrup YA, Hoidrup S, Obel EB, Rasmussen NK (2004) The validity of self-reported fractures among Danish female nurses: comparison with fractures registered in the Danish National Hospital Register. Scand J Public Health 32:136–143 CrossRef
- Beard CM, Melton LJ 3rd, Cedel SL, Richelson LS, Riggs BL (1990) Ascertainment of risk factors for osteoporosis: comparison of interview data with medical record review. J Bone Miner Res 5:691–699. doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650050705 CrossRef
- Chan KA, Andrade SE, Boles M, Buist DS, Chase GA, Donahue JG, Goodman MJ, Gurwitz JH, LaCroix AZ, Platt R (2000) Inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and risk of fracture among older women. Lancet 355:2185–2188. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02400-4 CrossRef
- Shatin D (2001) Organizational context and taxonomy of health care databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 10:367–371. doi:10.1002/pds.606 CrossRef
- Hennekens CH, Buring JE (1987) Screening. In: Mayrent SL (ed) Epidemiology in medicine. Little, Brown and Company, Boston/Toronto, pp 327–347
- Utility of automated data in identifying femoral shaft and subtrochanteric (diaphyseal) fractures
Volume 22, Issue 9 , pp 2523-2527
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Diaphyseal fracture
- International Classification of Diseases code
- Industry Sectors