The effect of weight and weight change on the long-term precision of spine and hip DXA measurements
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
We examined the effect of weight and weight change on the long-term precision of spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) in a group of 64 postmenopausal women studied over a 10-year period. Long-term precision errors were 50% larger than short-term errors. Over the range 50–90-kg weight was associated with a statistically significantly larger precision error when precision was expressed in BMD units, but not when expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV). Weight changes up to 5 kg had little effect on precision.
Reliable knowledge of the precision of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements is important for the interpretation of follow-up dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. In this study, we examined the effect of body weight and change in weight on the long-term precision of spine and hip BMD.
The study population was a group of 64 postmenopausal women enrolled in a 16-year trial of tibolone. We analyzed the spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD data acquired over a 10-year period on a Hologic QDR4500A densitometer using linear regression to examine the trend of BMD with time for each subject. Precision was expressed in BMD units (g cm−2) (standard error of the estimate, SEE) and also as the coefficient of variation (CV).
The long-term precision errors were in BMD (CV) units: 0.018 g cm−2 (1.9%) for spine, 0.017 g cm−2 (2.3%) for femoral neck, and 0.016 g cm−2 (1.7%) for total hip BMD. An inverse relationship between CV and BMD was found for the spine (P = 0.003) and total hip (P = 0.043) sites, but none between SEE and BMD. For spine BMD, there were statistically significant correlations between SEE and weight (P = 0.025) and body thickness (P = 0.027). For femoral neck BMD, there were correlations between SEE and weight (P = 0.030), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.023) and thickness (P = 0.021), but no correlations for total hip BMD or when precision was expressed as the CV. When study subjects were grouped in quartiles according to weight, the spine BMD SEE increased from 0.014 g cm−2 for women in the lowest quartile (46–62 kg) to 0.018 g cm−2 for women in the highest quartile (80–105 kg) (P = 0.008). There was a trend for SEE to be greater in individuals with larger weight changes, although these tended to be the heavier subjects.
From the study, we were able to come up with the following conclusions: (1) long-term precision errors were 50% larger than short-term errors, (2) over the range 50 to 90 kg (BMI: 20–35 kg m−2), body weight had a small but statistically significant effect on precision expressed in BMD units, but not when expressed as the CV, and (3) weight changes up to 5 kg had little effect on precision. More studies of individuals >100 kg are required to fully investigate the dependence of DXA scan precision on weight.
- National Osteoporosis Foundation (2010) Clinician’s Guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington DC, USA. Available at: http://www.nof.org/professionals/Clinicians_Guide.htm. Accessed 23 Feb 2010
- Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men from the age of 50 years in the UK. Maturitas 62: pp. 105-108 CrossRef
- International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD). Official positions 2007. Available at: http://www.iscd.org/Visitors/positions/OP-Index.cfm. Accessed 23 Feb 2010
- Bell, KJ, Hayen, A, Macaskill, P, Irwig, L, Craig, JC, Ensrud, K, Bauer, DC (2009) Value of routine monitoring of bone mineral density after starting bisphosphonate treatment: secondary analysis of trial data. BMJ 338: pp. b2266 CrossRef
- Watts, NB, Lewiecki, EM, Bonnick, SL, Laster, AJ, Binkley, N, Blank, RD, Geusens, PP, Miller, PD, Petak, SM, Recker, RR, Saag, KG, Schousboe, J, Siris, ES, Bilezikian, JP (2009) Clinical value of monitoring BMD in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 24: pp. 1643-1646 CrossRef
- Glüer, CC (1999) Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques. J Bone Miner Res 14: pp. 1952-1962 CrossRef
- Bonnick, SL, Johnston, CC, Kleerekoper, M, Lindsay, R, Miller, P, Sherwood, L, Siris, E (2001) Importance of precision in bone density measurements. J Clin Densitom 4: pp. 105-110 CrossRef
- Gluer, CC, Blake, G, Lu, Y, Blunt, BA, Jergas, M, Genant, HK (1995) Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 5: pp. 262-270 CrossRef
- Leslie, WD (2006) The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice. Bone 39: pp. 361-368 CrossRef
- Shepherd, JA, Morgan, SL, Lu, Y (2008) Comparing BMD results between two similar DXA systems using the generalized least significant change. J Clin Densitom 11: pp. 237-242 CrossRef
- Leslie, WD (2008) Factors affecting short-term bone density precision assessment and the effect on patient monitoring. J Bone Miner Res 23: pp. 199-204 CrossRef
- Sadatsafavi, M, Moayyeri, A, Wang, L, Leslie, WD (2008) Heteroscedastic regression analysis of factors affecting BMD monitoring. J Bone Miner Res 23: pp. 1842-1849 CrossRef
- Welsman, J, Knapp, K, MacLeod, K, Blake, G (2009) Obesity increases precision errors in dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements. Osteoporos Int 20: pp. S267-S268
- Blake, GM, Fogelman, I (2008) How important are BMD accuracy errors for the clinical interpretation of DXA scans?. J Bone Miner Res 23: pp. 457-462 CrossRef
- Binkley, N, Krueger, D, Vallarta-Ast, N (2003) An overlying fat panniculus affects femur bone mass measurement. J Clin Densitom 6: pp. 199-204 CrossRef
- Rymer, J, Chapman, MG, Fogelman, I (1994) Effect of tibolone on postmenopausal bone loss. Osteoporos Int 4: pp. 314-319 CrossRef
- Rymer, J, Robinson, J, Fogelman, I (2001) Effects of 8 years of treatment with tibolone 2.5 mg daily on postmenopausal bone loss. Osteoporos Int 12: pp. 478-483 CrossRef
- Rymer, J, Robinson, J, Fogelman, I (2002) Ten years of treatment with tibolone 2.5 mg daily: effects on bone loss in postmenopausal women. Climacteric 5: pp. 390-398
- Cummings, SR, Ettinger, B, Delmas, PD, Kenemans, P, Stathopoulos, V, Verweij, P, Mol-Arts, M, Kloosterboer, L, Mosca, L, Christiansen, C, Bilezikian, J, Kerzberg, EM, Johnson, S, Zanchetta, J, Grobbee, DE, Seifert, W, Eastell, R, Trial Investigators, LIFT (2008) The effects of tibolone in older postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 359: pp. 697-708 CrossRef
- Patel, R, Blake, GM, Rymer, J, Fogelman, I (2000) Long-term precision of DXA scanning assessed over seven years in forty postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 11: pp. 68-75 CrossRef
- Blake, GM, Parker, JC, Buxton, FMA, Fogelman, I (1993) Dual x-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans. Brit J Radiol 66: pp. 902-906 CrossRef
- Blake, GM, Fogelman, I (1995) Replacing dual x-ray absorptiometry scanners: cross-calibration of a new multidetector array system. J Bone Miner Res 10: pp. S267
- Blake, GM (1996) Replacing DXA scanners: cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading. Calcif Tissue Int 59: pp. 1-5 CrossRef
- QDR for Windows XP Reference manual (2004) Hologic Inc, Bedford, MA, pp 9.21–9.23.
- Altman, DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London
- Shepherd, JA, Fan, B, Lu, Y, Lewiecki, EM, Miller, P, Genant, HK (2006) Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans. Osteoporos Int 17: pp. 1303-1308 CrossRef
- Holland, WW, Whitehead, TP (1974) Value of new laboratory tests in diagnosis and treatment. Lancet 304: pp. 391-394 CrossRef
- Hangartner, TN (2007) A study of the long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometers and implications for the validity of the least-significant change calculation. Osteoporos Int 18: pp. 513-523 CrossRef
- Noon E, Singh S, Cuzick J, Spector TD, Williams FM, Frost ML, Howell A, Harvie M, Eastell R, Coleman RE, Fogelman I, Blake GM (2010) Significant differences in UK and US female bone density reference ranges. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jan 9. [Epub ahead of print].
- The effect of weight and weight change on the long-term precision of spine and hip DXA measurements
Volume 22, Issue 5 , pp 1503-1512
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Body weight
- Bone mineral density
- Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
- Long-term precision
- Weight change
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Osteoporosis Research Unit, Division of Imaging Sciences, King’s College London Guy’s Campus, London, UK
- 2. Menopause Research Unit, Division of Reproduction & Endocrinology, King’s College London Guy’s Campus, London, UK
- 3. Academic Bone Densitometry Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
- 4. Osteoporosis Research Unit, 1st Floor, Tower Wing Guy’s Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK