Osteoporosis International

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 248–251

Former exercisers of an 18-month intervention display residual aBMD benefits compared with control women 3.5 years post-intervention: a follow-up of a randomized controlled high-impact trial

Authors

    • UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research
    • Faculty of MedicineUniversity of British Columbia
  • A. Heinonen
    • UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research
  • P. Kannus
    • UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research
  • M. Pasanen
    • UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research
  • H. Sievänen
    • UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research
  • I. Vuori
    • UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1559-0

Cite this article as:
Kontulainen, S., Heinonen, A., Kannus, P. et al. Osteoporos Int (2004) 15: 248. doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1559-0

Abstract

Exercise is recommended to enhance bone health but data on the maintenance of the exercise-induced bone benefit is sparse. The purpose of the study was to assess the maintenance of the musculoskeletal benefits obtained in an 18-month intervention of high-impact exercise in premenopausal women (34 former trainees and 31 controls). Physical performance and areal bone mineral density (aBMD, g/cm2) were measured at baseline, after 18 months, and after 5 years. All significant 18-month improvements relative to controls in the trainees’ neuromuscular performance (isometric leg press, and vertical jump with and without additional 10% weight of the body mass) had been lost at the 5-year follow-up. However, since the changes in aBMD in both former trainees and controls by time were similar, the exercise-induced aBMD gain (i.e. the mean statistically significant intergroup differences of 1–3% in favor of the trainees) was maintained at the femoral neck, distal femur, patella, proximal tibia, and calcaneus at the 5-year follow-up. At lumbar spine, the difference was 1.7% at both 18-month and at the 5-year follow-ups but the difference was not statistically significant (NS) in the latter follow-up. At the trochanter and unloaded distal radius, the intergroup aBMD differences were NS at both the 18-month and 5-year follow-ups. In conclusion, the bone sites aBMD increased in response to the 18-month intervention, also demonstrated maintenance of this gain 3.5 years after the intervention. In contrast, the exercise-induced improvements in the neuromuscular performance vanished during the post intervention follow-up. These findings suggest the possibility of long-term bone benefits of high-impact training in women.

Keywords

Areal bone mineral density (aBMD)DetrainingExerciseOsteoporosisPrevention

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2004