International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 301–319

Epidemiology and Natural History of Urinary Incontinence

  • S. Hunskaar
  • E. P. Arnold
  • K. Burgio
  • A. C. Diokno
  • A. R. Herzog
  • V. T. Mallett
Review Article

DOI: 10.1007/s001920070021

Cite this article as:
Hunskaar, S., Arnold, E., Burgio, K. et al. Int Urogynecol J (2000) 11: 301. doi:10.1007/s001920070021

Abstract:

This paper examines or current state of knowledge of the epidemiology of urinary incontinence. The population studied was community-dwelling non-institutionalized persons. The review includes discussion of the prevalence, incidence, natural history and presence of racial and ethnic differences in the epidemiology of urinary incontinence. We also review correlates and potential risk factors that have been revealed in epidemiological studies. Differences between epidemiological and clinical approaches to a health problem, help-seeking behavior and methodological issues for research are also discussed. We have reviewed a large number of completed studies in the field of urinary incontinence, and have emphasized high-quality and population-based studies. We also wished to present studies from a variety of countries. Because of the abundance of studies, only a small fraction can be presented here. Other studies may have equal standards and useful information, but lack of space precludes their inclusion.

Key words: Children – Epidemiology – Men – Review – Urinary incontinence – Women

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Hunskaar
    • 1
  • E. P. Arnold
    • 2
  • K. Burgio
    • 3
  • A. C. Diokno
    • 4
  • A. R. Herzog
    • 5
  • V. T. Mallett
    • 6
  1. 1.Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, NorwayNO
  2. 2.Department of Urology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New ZealandNZ
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USAUS
  4. 4.Department of Urology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USAUS
  5. 5.Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAUS
  6. 6.Division of Gynaecology, Hutzel Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USAUS