The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Introduction and hypothesis
The objective of this study is to determine the association between the POPQ and a simplified version of the POPQ.
This was an observational study. The subjects with pelvic floor disorder symptoms underwent two exams: a POPQ exam and a simplified POPQ. To compare with the simplified POPQ, vaginal segments of the POPQ exam were defined using points Ba, Bp, C, and D. Primary outcome was the association between the overall ordinal stages from each exam.
One hundred forty-three subjects with mean age of 56 +/− 13 years. Twenty three subjects were status post-hysterectomy. The Kendall's tau-b statistic for overall stage was 0.80, for the anterior vaginal wall the Kendall's tau-b was 0.71, for the posterior vaginal wall segment the Kendall's tau-b was 0.71, for the cervix the Kendall's tau-b was 0.88, for the posterior fornix/vaginal cuff the Kendall's tau-b was 0.85.
There is substantial association between the POPQ and a simplified version of the POPQ.
- Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17 CrossRef
- Muir TW, Stepp KJ, Barber MD (2003) Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapsed quantification system in peer-reviewed literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1632–1636 CrossRef
- Treszezamsky AD, Rascoff L, Shahryarinejad A, Vardy MD (2010) Use of pelvic organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized journals. Int Urogynecol J 21:359–363 CrossRef
- Prien-Larsen J, Mouritsen L (2001) Pelvic organ prolapse: is ICS-grading without POP-Q measurement reliable? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(Suppl):45, abstract
- Swift S, Morris S, McKinnie V, Freeman R, Petri E, Scotti RJ et al (2006) Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Int Urogynecol J 17:615–620 CrossRef
- Kendall MG (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30:81–93
- Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L, Cartwright R (2008) Experiences and expectations of women with urogenital prolapse: a quantitative and qualitative exploration. BJOG 115:1362–1368 CrossRef
- DeLancey JOL (2005) The hidden epidemics of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1488–1495 CrossRef
- Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GC, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1471 CrossRef
- Kobak WH, Rosenberger K, Walters MD (1996) Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7:121–124 CrossRef
- Bland DR, Earle BB, Vitolins MZ, Burke G (1999) Use of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1324–1327 CrossRef
- Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S (2004) Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:324–327
- Steele A, Mallipeddi P, Welgoss J, Soled S, Kohli N, Karram M (1998) Teaching the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1458–1463 CrossRef
- The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse
International Urogynecology Journal
Volume 22, Issue 3 , pp 347-352
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system
- Standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system
- Inter-system association
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Glostrup County Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
- 3. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- 4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 5. Department of Medicine/Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA