International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 19, Issue 10, pp 1359–1362

Mixed incontinence is more bothersome than pure incontinence subtypes

  • Yashika Dooley
  • Lior Lowenstein
  • Kimberly Kenton
  • MaryPat FitzGerald
  • Linda Brubaker
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0637-4

Cite this article as:
Dooley, Y., Lowenstein, L., Kenton, K. et al. Int Urogynecol J (2008) 19: 1359. doi:10.1007/s00192-008-0637-4

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare incontinence bother in women with mixed incontinence versus pure incontinence subtypes. This is an institutional review board-approved study comparing physical exam findings and responses to the Medical Epidemiologic and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA) questionnaire and the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6). The MESA responses were used to classify women as mixed, pure stress, or pure urge incontinence. This analysis includes 551 women with a mean age of 56 ± 16 years. Most women were Caucasian (86%) with 7% African American and 5% Hispanic. UDI scores were significantly higher in women with mixed incontinence (61 ± 23) than those with pure stress incontinence (40 ± 26) or pure urge incontinence (40 ± 25; p < 0.0001). Women with mixed incontinence report greater incontinence bother than women with either pure stress or urge incontinence.

Keywords

BotherMixed incontinenceQuality of lifeStress incontinenceUrge incontinence

Copyright information

© International Urogynecology Journal 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yashika Dooley
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lior Lowenstein
    • 1
  • Kimberly Kenton
    • 1
  • MaryPat FitzGerald
    • 1
  • Linda Brubaker
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive SurgeryLoyola University Medical CenterMaywoodUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MCHE-OGBrooke Army Medical CenterFort Sam HoustonUSA