Skip to main content
Log in

A comment on the article “A collinearity diagnosis of the GNSS geocenter determination” by P. Rebischung, Z. Altamimi, and T. Springer

Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Meindl et al. (Adv Space Res 51(7):1047–1064, 2013) showed that the geocenter \(z\)-component estimated from observations of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) is strongly correlated to a particular parameter of the solar radiation pressure (SRP) model developed by Beutler et al. (Manuscr Geod 19:367–386, 1994). They analyzed the forces caused by SRP and the impact on the satellites’ orbits. The authors achieved their results using perturbation theory and celestial mechanics. Rebischung et al. (J Geod doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.10.026, 2013) also deal with the geocenter determination with GNSS. The authors carried out a collinearity diagnosis of the associated parameter estimation problem. They conclude “without much exaggerating that current GNSS are insensitive to any component of geocenter motion”. They explain this inability by the high degree of collinearity of the geocenter coordinates mainly with satellite clock corrections. Based on these results and additional experiments, they state that the conclusions drawn by Meindl et al. (Adv Space Res 51(7):1047–1064, 2013) are questionable. We do not agree with these conclusions and present our arguments in this article. In the first part, we review and highlight the main characteristics of the studies performed by Meindl et al. (Adv Space Res 51(7):1047–1064, 2013) to show that the experiments are quite different from those performed by Rebischung et al. (J Geod doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.10.026,2013) . In the second part, we show that normal equation (NEQ) systems are regular when estimating geocenter coordinates, implying that the covariance matrices associated with the NEQ systems may be used to assess the sensitivity to geocenter coordinates in a standard way. The sensitivity of GNSS to the components of the geocenter is discussed. Finally, we comment on the arguments raised by Rebischung et al. (J Geod doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.10.026, 2013) against the results of Meindl et al. (Adv Space Res 51(7):1047–1064, 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Beutler G, Brockmann E, Gurtner W, Hugentobler U, Mervart L, Rothacher M, Verdun A (1994) Extended orbit modeling techniques at the CODE processing center of the International GPS Service for geodynamics (IGS): theory and initial results. Manuscr. Geod. 19:367–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler G (2005) Methods of celestial mechanics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Meindl M, Fridez P (eds) (2007) The Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0. Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland

  • Meindl M (2011) Combined Analysis of Observations from Different Global Navigation Satellite Systems, Geodätisch-geophysikalische Arbeiten in der Schweiz, vol 83. Eidg.Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindl M, Beutler G, Thaller D, Dach R, Jäggi A (2013) Geocenter coordinates estimated from GNSS data as viewed by perturbation theory. Adv Space Res 51(7):1047–1064. ISSN 0273–1177. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.10.026

  • Rebischung P, Altamimi Z, Springer T (2013) A collinearity diagnosis of the GNSS geocenter determination. J Geod. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.10.026

  • Rothacher M, Beutler G (1998) The role of GPS in the study of global change. Phys Chem Earth 23(9–10):1029–1040. doi:10.1016/S0079-1946(98)00143-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer TA (2000) Modeling and validating orbits and clocks using the Global Positioning System, Geodätisch-geophysikalische Arbeiten in der Schweiz, vol 60. Eidg.Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Meindl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meindl, M., Beutler, G., Thaller, D. et al. A comment on the article “A collinearity diagnosis of the GNSS geocenter determination” by P. Rebischung, Z. Altamimi, and T. Springer. J Geod 89, 189–194 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0765-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0765-1

Keywords

Navigation