Skip to main content
Log in

Black swans and white eagles: on mathematics and finance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is often objected that we cannot use mathematical methods in finance because (1) finance is dominated by unpredictable unique events (the black swans), (2) there are qualitative effects that cannot be quantified, and (3) the laws themselves of finance keep on changing. In this paper we discuss these three objections, offering arguments to reject them. We begin by reviewing the development of the physical sciences, pointing out parallels that are relevant for our discussion. Modern science has abandoned the objective of describing reality and has adopted an operational point of view that regards physical laws as tools to connect observations. Modern science is no longer deterministic, but has accepted a fundamental uncertainty in physical laws both at micro and macroscopic levels. Unpredictable pivotal events exist in the physical sciences as well in finance but this does not lead us to question the use of mathematics in the physical sciences. On the contrary, using principles of safe design, we try to understand how to avoid and contain unpredictability. Financial markets are manmade artifacts with, as actors, a large number of interacting agents. If we so wish, we can reduce the level of uncertainty present in markets: But if we try to do so describing financial markets with simple mathematical laws, we find that these laws are not stable but change over time, eventually with sudden structural breaks. This makes the use of mathematical finance difficult but not impossible. We can forecast human decision-making processes, crucial in forecasting financial markets, at the statistical level in aggregate. From an operational point of view, we have the tools to understand and describe the behavior of large number of interacting agents. At the present stage of development of our science, we need to use the mathematics of adaptive systems, changing mathematical models in function of different market states. However, reductionism to a small number of basic laws remains a fundamental objective of financial economics as it is in the physical sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell JS (1964) On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox. Physics 1: 195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman PW (1927) The logic of modern physics. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogle J (2008) A question so important that it should be hard to think about anything else. J Portfolio Manage Winter: 95–102

  • Canetti E (1960) Crowds and power. Farrar, Strus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bondt W, Thaler RH (1996) Financial decision-making in markets and firms: a behavioral perspective. In: Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science, vol 9. North-Holland, Amsterdam

  • Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Phys Rev 47: 777–780

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1953) Essays in positive economics. University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, Scheinkman J (2002) Non-market interactions. In: Dewatripont M, Hansen LP, Turnovsky S (eds) Advances in economics and econometrics: theory and applications, Eight World Congress. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, Scheinkman J (2001) Measuring social interactions. In: Durlauf S, Young P (eds) Social dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WR (1835) Second essay on a general method in dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Part I: 95: 144

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman AS (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland F, Prescott E (1977) Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans. J Polit Econ 85: 473–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R (1976) Economic policy evaluation: a critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Publ Policy 1: 19–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Merton RC (2006) Paul Samuelson and financial economics. Am Econ Fall (online)

  • Phoa W, Focardi S, Fabozzi FJ (2007) How do conflicting theories about financial markets coexist. J Post Keynesian Econ 29: 699–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1947) Foundations of economic analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Scheinkman JA, Glaeser EL, Sacerdote B (1996) Crime and social interactions. Q J Econ 111: 507–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrodinger E (1935) Die gegenwrtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics). Naturwissenschaften (Natural Sciences) 48:807; 49:823; 50:844

  • Shiller RJ (1999) Human Behavior and the Efficiency of the Financial System. in Taylor JB, Woodford M (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics, vol 1, pp 1305–1340. North Holland, Amsterdam

  • Strauss CL (1963) Structural anthropology. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb N (2007) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. RandomHouse, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom R (1972) Stabilité Structurelle et Morphogénèse, Essai d’une Théorie Générale des Modèles. Reading, MA: W. A. Benjamin. (English translation by Fowler DH (1975) Structural stability and morphogenesys. Addison Wesley, New York)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Focardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Focardi, S., Fabozzi, F.J. Black swans and white eagles: on mathematics and finance. Math Meth Oper Res 69, 379–394 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-008-0243-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-008-0243-8

Keywords

Navigation