Skip to main content
Log in

Correlated equilibrium and concave games

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper shows that if a game satisfies the sufficient condition for the existence and uniqueness of a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium provided by Rosen (Econometrica 33:520, 1965), then the game has a unique correlated equilibrium, which places probability one on the unique pure-strategy Nash equilibrium. In addition, it shows that a weaker condition suffices for the uniqueness of a correlated equilibrium. The condition generalizes the sufficient condition for the uniqueness of a correlated equilibrium provided by Neyman (Int J Game Theory 26:223, 1997) for a potential game with a strictly concave potential function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aumann RJ (1974) Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies. J Math Econ 1:67–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann RJ (1987) Correlated equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian rationality. Econometrica 55:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabay D, Moulin H (1980) On the uniqueness and stability of Nash equilibria in noncooperative games. In: Bensoussan A, Kleindorfer P, Tapiero CS (eds) Applied stochastic control in econometrics and management science. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 271–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart S, Schmeidler D (1989) Existence of correlated equilibria. Math Oper Res 14:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman P, Stampacchia G (1966) On some nonlinear elliptic differential functional equations. Acta Math 115:271–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L (1996) Correlated equilibrium of Cournot oligopoly competition. J Econ Theory 68:544–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monderer D, Shapley LS (1996) Potential games. Games Econ Behav 14:124–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris S, Ui T (2004) Best response equivalence. Games Econ Behav 49:260–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney A (1993) Network economics: a variational inequality approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman A (1997) Correlated equilibrium and potential games. Int J Game Theory 26:223–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen JB (1965) Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave N-person games. Econometrica 33:520–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade ME (1994) What does an oligopoly maximize? J Ind Econ 42:45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Ui.

Additional information

I thank the editor, an associate editor, and an anonymous referee for detailed comments and suggestions, which have substantially improved this paper. Special thanks are due to the referee for pointing out Lemmas 4 and 5. I acknowledge financial support by The Japan Economic Research Foundation and by MEXT, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research. All remaining errors are mine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ui, T. Correlated equilibrium and concave games. Int J Game Theory 37, 1–13 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-007-0098-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-007-0098-x

JEL Classification

Keywords

Navigation