Compensatory transfers in two-player decision problems
- Jerry Green
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper presents an axiomatic characterization of a family of solutions to two-player quasi-linear social choice problems. In these problems the players select a single action from a set available to them. They may also transfer money between themselves.
The solutions form a one-parameter family, where the parameter is a non-negative number, t.
The solutions can be interpreted as follows: Any efficient action can be selected. Based on this action, compute for each player a “best claim for compensation”. A claim for compensation is the difference between the value of an alternative action and the selected efficient action, minus a penalty proportional to the extent to which the alternative action is inefficient. The coefficient of proportionality of this penalty is t. The best claim for compensation for a player is the maximum of this computed claim over all possible alternative actions. The solution, at the parameter value t, is to implement the chosen efficient action and make a monetary transfer equal to the average of these two best claims. The characterization relies on three main axioms. The paper presents and justifies these axioms and compares them to related conditions used in other bargaining contexts. In Nash Bargaining Theory, the axioms analogous to these three are in conflict with each other. In contrast, in the quasi-linear social choice setting of this paper, all three conditions can be satisfied simultaneously.
- Compensatory transfers in two-player decision problems
International Journal of Game Theory
Volume 33, Issue 2 , pp 159-180
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- quasi-linear solutions
- monetary transfers
- cost allocation
- Industry Sectors
- Jerry Green (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Harvard University,