Computational Statistics

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 259–277

Empirical study for the agreement between statistical methods in quality assessment and control of microarray data

  • Markus Schmidberger
  • Esmeralda Vicedo
  • Ulrich Mansmann
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s00180-010-0216-2

Cite this article as:
Schmidberger, M., Vicedo, E. & Mansmann, U. Comput Stat (2011) 26: 259. doi:10.1007/s00180-010-0216-2


As microarray data quality can affect each step of the microarray analysis process, quality assessment and control is an integral part. It detects divergent measurements beyond the acceptable level of random fluctuations. This empirical study identifies association and correlation between the six quality assessment methods for microarray outlier detection used in the arrayQualityMetrics package version 2.2.2. For evaluation two different agreement tests—Cohen’s Kappa, after a homogeneity marginal criteria, and AC1 Statistic—, the Pearson Correlation Coefficient and realistic microarray data from the public ArrayExpress database have been used. It is possible to assess the quality of a data set using only four of the six currently proposed statistical methods to comprehensively quantify the quality information in large series of microarrays. This saves computation time and reduces decision complexity for the analyst. The new proposed rule is validated with data sets from biomedical studies.


Empirical studyMicroarrayQuality assessment and controlRBioconductor

Supplementary material

180_2010_216_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (617 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 616 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (612 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 611 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (533 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 533 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (599 kb)
ESM 4 (PDF 598 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (624 kb)
ESM 5 (PDF 623 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (575 kb)
ESM 6 (PDF 574 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM7_ESM.html (191 kb)
ESM 7 (HTML 191 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM8_ESM.html (96 kb)
ESM 8 (HTML 96.2 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM9_ESM.html (166 kb)
ESM 9 (HTML 165 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM10_ESM.html (140 kb)
ESM 10 (HTML 139 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM11_ESM.html (249 kb)
ESM 11 (HTML 248 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM12_ESM.html (175 kb)
ESM 12 (HTML 174 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM13_ESM.r (1 kb)
ESM 13 (R 1.28 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM14_ESM.r (6 kb)
ESM 14 (R 5.63 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM15_ESM.r (23 kb)
ESM 15 (R 23.1 kb)
180_2010_216_MOESM16_ESM.txt (1 kb)
ESM 16 (TXT 753 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Schmidberger
    • 1
  • Esmeralda Vicedo
    • 1
  • Ulrich Mansmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Biometrics and BioinformaticsIBE, University of MunichMunichGermany