Skip to main content
Log in

How to avoid collision between PCL and MCL femoral tunnels during a simultaneous reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to assess the risk of femoral tunnel collisions between the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tunnels during a simultaneous PCL and MCL reconstruction.

Methods

Fourth generation medium and large synthetic femur bones were used. On each femur, a MCL tunnel and a PCL tunnel were reamed. The MCL tunnel was drilled at 0°, 20° and 40° of axial and coronal angulations. The PCL femoral tunnel was reamed to simulate two different tunnel directions that could be obtained through an inside-out and outside-in technique. Tunnels were filled with epoxy resin augmented with BaSO4, and a multidetector CT examination of each specimen was performed.

Results

High rate of tunnel collision (62.5 %) was found when the MCL femoral tunnel was reamed with a coronal angulation of 0° and 20°. The rate of tunnel collision significantly decreased (0 %) when the MCL tunnel was reamed proximally with a coronal angulation of 40°. No differences were found between the two PCL tunnel directions in terms of tunnel collision.

Conclusion

The results of this study can help surgeons to better direct the femoral MCL tunnel in order to avoid a collision between femoral tunnels during a combined MCL and PCL reconstruction. In order to minimize such potential complications, the MCL tunnel should be created limiting the axial angulation and it should be drilled with a proximal angulation from 20° to 40°, depending on the medial condyle width.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergfeld JA, Graham SM, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE (2005) A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques. Am J Sports Med 33:976–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bin SI, Nam TS (2007) Surgical outcome of 2-stage management of multiple knee ligament injuries after knee dislocation. Arthroscopy 23:1066–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Camarda L, D’Arienzo M, Patera GP, Filosto L, LaPrade RF (2011) Avoiding tunnel collisions between fibular collateral ligament and ACL posterolateral bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:598–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coobs BR, Wijdicks CA, Armitage BM et al (2010) An in vitro analysis of an anatomical medial knee reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38:339–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edson CJ (2006) Conservative and postoperative rehabilitation of isolated and combined injuries of the medial collateral ligament. Sports Med Arthrosc 14:105–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellsasser JC, Reynolds FC, Omohundro JR (1974) The non-operative treatment of collateral ligament injuries of the knee in professional football players. An analysis of seventy-four injuries treated non-operatively and twenty-four injuries treated surgically. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1185–1190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frolke JP, Oskam J, Vierhout PA (1998) Primary reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament in combined injury of the medial collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments. short-term results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:103–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gelber PE, Erquicia JI, Sosa G et al (2013) Femoral tunnel drilling angles for the posterolateral corner in multiligamentary knee reconstructions: computed tomography evaluation in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy 29:257–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hammoud S, Reinhardt KR, Marx RG (2010) Outcomes of posterior cruciate ligament treatment: a review of the evidence. Sports Med Arthrosc 18:280–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harner CD, Baek GH, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Kashiwaguchi S, Woo SL (1999) Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 15:741–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Indelicato PA (1983) Non-operative treatment of complete tears of the medial collateral ligament of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:323–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johannsen AM, Anderson CJ, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2013) Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 41:35–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kannus P (1988) Long-term results of conservatively treated medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:103–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim SJ, Lee DH, Kim TE, Choi NH (2008) Concomitant reconstruction of the medial collateral and posterior oblique ligaments for medial instability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1323–1327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laprade RF, Wijdicks CA (2012) Surgical technique: development of an anatomic medial knee reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:806–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li B, Wang JS, He M, Wang GB, Shen P, Bai LH (2014) Comparison of hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3267-z

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lind M, Jakobsen BW, Lund B, Hansen MS, Abdallah O, Christiansen SE (2009) Anatomical reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner of the knee in patients with chronic medial collateral ligament instability. Am J Sports Med 37:1116–1122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Makris CA, Georgoulis AD, Papageorgiou CD, Moebius UG, Soucacos PN (2000) Posterior cruciate ligament architecture: evaluation under microsurgical dissection. Arthroscopy 16:627–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mejia EA, Noyes FR, Grood ES (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament femoral insertion site characteristics. importance for reconstructive procedures. Am J Sports Med 30:643–651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Brien SJ, Warren RF, Pavlov H, Panariello R, Wickiewicz TL (1991) Reconstruction of the chronically insufficient anterior cruciate ligament with the central third of the patellar ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:278–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Race A, Amis AA (1998) PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of ‘isometric’ versus single and double-bundled ‘anatomic’ grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:173–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reider B, Sathy MR, Talkington J, Blyznak N, Kollias S (1994) Treatment of isolated medial collateral ligament injuries in athletes with early functional rehabilitation. A five-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 22:470–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tompkins M, Keller TC, Milewski MD et al (2013) Anatomic femoral tunnels in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: inside-out versus outside-in drilling. Am J Sports Med 41:43–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ, Miller MD, Hart JM (2008) Hamstring graft size prediction: a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 36:2204–2209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weimann A, Schatka I, Herbort M et al (2012) Reconstruction of the posterior oblique ligament and the posterior cruciate ligament in knees with posteromedial instability. Arthroscopy 28:1283–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiley WB, Askew MJ, Melby A III, Noe DA (2006) Kinematics of the posterior cruciate ligament/posterolateral corner-injured knee after reconstruction by single- and double-bundle intra-articular grafts. Am J Sports Med 34:741–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wijdicks CA, Griffith CJ, LaPrade RF et al (2009) Radiographic identification of the primary medial knee structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:521–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshiya S, Kuroda R, Mizuno K, Yamamoto T, Kurosaka M (2005) Medial collateral ligament reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendons: technique and results in initial cases. Am J Sports Med 33:1380–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, Tang T, Rubash HE, Li G (2011) Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women. J Arthroplast 26:124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Camarda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camarda, L., Grassedonio, E., Lauria, M. et al. How to avoid collision between PCL and MCL femoral tunnels during a simultaneous reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 2767–2772 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3446-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3446-y

Keywords

Navigation